Related changes

22 April 2025

• diffhist Cartesian product 17:31 −721 Senomo Drines talk contribs (Nevermind.) Tag: Manual revert
• diffhist Cartesian product 17:29 +566 Senomo Drines talk contribs (Forgot the source.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Cartesian product 17:29 +17 Senomo Drines talk contribs Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Cartesian product 17:28 +138 Senomo Drines talk contribs (A sentence bringing up binary relations should be here, since they share a similar concept, although placing it in a see also section is fine too.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Cartesian product 17:19 +22 Senomo Drines talk contribs (Similar to the revision done in binary relations, a and b can be misinterpreted to be subsets of A and B instead of elements of A and B.)
• diffhist Binary relation 16:05 −8 D.Lazard talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Senomo Drines (talk): Reders of this article are supposed to have read the hatnote or have followed the link to set (mathematics) given in the first sentence. If you disagree, take it on the talk page) Tags: Twinkle Undo
• diffhist Binary relation 15:57 +8 Senomo Drines talk contribs (Undid revision 1286817173 by TakuyaMurata (talk) Why would a reader implicitly assume repetition of the same pair does not happen? They are not a mathematician, we are talking about the average reader. Your analogy is also odd because the phrase "set of different people" works just fine, it just means a set of people with differing characteristics.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 08:47 0 D.Lazard talk contribs (→Axiom of choice: {{efn}} at the end of the sentence)
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 08:43 −1 D.Lazard talk contribs (→References: renaming for avoiding duplicate headings)
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 07:47 +3 Jochen Burghardt talk contribs (use 1963a,1963b to fix remaining error (BTW: there are two sections called "References"))
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 07:43 −2 Jochen Burghardt talk contribs (ref-->efn to fix error msgs) Tag: harv or sfn error
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 07:25 +769 Jochen Burghardt talk contribs (→References: add cited refs Godel,Cohen)
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 07:18 +178 Jochen Burghardt talk contribs (→Axiom of choice: suggest to mention independence (as it is somewhat surprising))
• diffhist Cartesian product 06:49 −832 Jochen Burghardt talk contribs (Undid revision 1286707724 by Senomo Drines (talk): A,B should be given on the left-hand side of the definition; "combinations" is not that much different from (and less precise than) "pairs"; relations are mentioned in the body (and may distract non-mathematicians from the main issues in the lead)) Tag: Undo
• diffhist Binary relation 04:50 −9 TakuyaMurata talk contribs (different is also very weird; you don't say a set of different people. You just say a set of people (since we implicitly assume there is no repetition))
• diffhist Binary relation 04:47 +33 Senomo Drines talk contribs (This is getting semantical, but I removed it regardless.)
• diffhist Binary relation 04:44 −48 TakuyaMurata talk contribs (Undid revision 1286807131 by Senomo Drines (talk) i''m very tempted to rever this; e.g., represent isn't a standard terminology) Tag: Undo
• diffhist Binary relation 03:01 +48 Senomo Drines talk contribs (Undid revision 1286726092 by D.Lazard (talk) It is still unclear whether or not it is referring to x and y as an "element" or as a "subset" of X and Y. An unknowing reader can interpret this as the cumulative set of x, y, rather than the set of differing pairs of x, y. Clarification is absolutely needed; ambiguity leads to wrongful conjecture.) Tags: Undo Reverted

21 April 2025

• diffhist Binary relation 16:36 −48 D.Lazard talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Senomo Drines (talk): "x in S" is not vague. It the standard way to say that x is an element of of the set S. You can verify this by reading any text on mathematical sets) Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
• diffhist Binary relation 15:40 +48 Senomo Drines talk contribs (If clarification is needed, then x and y should clarify to be elements, being "in" a set is uncomfortably vague.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Binary relation 14:48 −264 D.Lazard talk contribs (Undid revision 1286707691 by Senomo Drines (talk) this change is very confusing as relying on undefined (in this context) concepts of combination and pairing. Added twice "some" for clarification)
• diffhist Cartesian product 14:27 +832 Senomo Drines talk contribs (If you describe what it is first, and then put it into notation, the reader can connect the dots significantly easier.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Binary relation 14:27 +275 Senomo Drines talk contribs (Its difficult to differentiate whether it is talking about the elements of a set or the pairing between the elements of the sets.)
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 10:28 +1,901 D.Lazard talk contribs (→Zorn's lemma: filling the section)

19 April 2025

• diffhist Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration 11:34 −1 Nthep talk contribs (change line 1754 parameter to true to hide ISBN/ date compatibility issues. See Help talk:Citation Style 1#ISBN / Date incompatibility and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Template edit incorrectly creating error cat with 25000+ entries needs reverting)
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 11:09 +900 D.Lazard talk contribs (→Axiom of choice: New section,; subsections will be expanded later)

18 April 2025

• diffhist Set (mathematics) 17:34 −2,989 D.Lazard talk contribs (→Set theory: Rm section that, except for trivia, duplicates section Context, or are out of the scope defined in section Context)
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 17:18 +264 D.Lazard talk contribs (→Context: + "See also" of the main articles on set theory)

16 April 2025

• diffhist Amartya Sen 23:04 −54 Dissoxciate talk contribs (Undid revision 1285320570 by Jaunpurzada (talk) his ethnicity is bengali; sub-group isnt relevant) Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit