Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
18 April 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Notability 21:22 0 PK-WIKI talk contribs (→Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article: change order of the items in the table for better flow)
17 April 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 07:45 −298 Iiii I I I talk contribs (→Reasons for merging: remove incoherent sentence added by indef blocked user without clear consensus)
16 April 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 23:59 +26 Moxy talk contribs (→Community: |upright....reduce section overlap....same sze as first image in sectio)
- diffhist Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 23:56 +40 Moxy talk contribs (→Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: wow old example ...update with FA example plus tangible info on what is done)
15 April 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 05:29 −6 WhatamIdoing talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: Not always true) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 03:25 +69 Beland talk contribs (→Typographic conformity: (except in proper names and for languages where ligatures are standard, per {{section link||Ampersand}} and MOS:LIGATURE))
14 April 2025
- diffhist Wayback Machine 01:34 +41 MimirIsSmart talk contribs (Use American English) Tag: Visual edit
12 April 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 13:28 −35 SmokeyJoe talk contribs (→top: per WP:LINKBOXES, with 90 day pageviews of 16986, 429, 880, 468, only WP:RS is justified as the recommended shortcut. All shortcuts will still work)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 08:39 −10 Mathglot talk contribs (Undid revision 1285185074 by Rollinginhisgrave (talk) Seems like that means we can't we publish the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors anymore, unless someone else describes them, but that is not true. Or maybe the new wording doesn't mean that, so what does it mean? In any case, I read the Talk discussion, and it doesn't okay this wording.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 05:07 +10 Rollinginhisgrave talk contribs (→Overview: opinions of reliable sources → opinions described in reliable sources per talk) Tag: Reverted