Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
9 July 2025
- diffhist Programming language 13:06 −2 Stevebroshar talk contribs (better word)
- diffhist Programming language 13:04 −408 Stevebroshar talk contribs (Element is overly generic; I see language definition and features; and this allows removing the jarring stuff from the into)
- diffhist Programming language 12:50 −21 Stevebroshar talk contribs (→Semantics: get to the point)
- diffhist Programming language 12:42 −579 Stevebroshar talk contribs (This whole paragraph is uncited and low-value; in particular: exception handling is covered later; prog lang theory is better handled as see-also (which it already is))
- diffhist Programming language 12:37 −40 Stevebroshar talk contribs (It's not just simplicity; it's about quality! Better software)
- diffhist Programming language 12:33 −277 Stevebroshar talk contribs (→Classifications: if scripting is a category then it should be another item; regardless it should be a side-note of imperative)
- diffhist Programming language 12:27 +48 Stevebroshar talk contribs (→Classifications: Edit for better organization; stuff and the end was not well integrated)
- diffhist Programming language 12:13 −582 Stevebroshar talk contribs (This section is not so much about the definition of prog lang as it is how that term relates to other terms: natural language, computer language and formal specification langauge) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- diffhist Programming language 11:54 +400 Stevebroshar talk contribs (It's about _source code_ regardless of whether it's for a program; a compiler/interpreter is not an _implementation_ of a language yet some automated process (i.e. compiler/interpreter) is required to use source code) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Programming language 11:31 +22 Stevebroshar talk contribs (it _can_ be described in many (other) ways than syntax and semantics ... a formal lang is another way to describe it or even define it.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Programming language 11:28 +1 Stevebroshar talk contribs (it's for controlling a _computer_; not any ol' machine (yes sometimes we call a computer a machine but that's inaccurate))
- diffhist Programming language 11:27 −18 Stevebroshar talk contribs ('instructions' is overly specific (implies command/imperative); it's about control (however that's conveyed))
- diffhist Programming language 11:25 +28 Stevebroshar talk contribs (→Definitions: Reword for accuracy; it's not for communicating with _all_ machines; only computers ... although there are other differences (i.e. syntax) intension is a big difference; prog lang is for _controlling_)
- diffhist Programming language 11:20 +46 Stevebroshar talk contribs (Singular is better than plural)