Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
25 June 2025
- diffhist The Guardian 22:37 −809 Fedjmike talk contribs (Remove Suella Braverman comments section; unnotable) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist The Guardian 22:36 −1,368 Fedjmike talk contribs (Move "Guardian reader" and "Grauniad" out of lead section: non-notable trivia used to discredit the subject on superficial grounds (NPOV violation). Other newspapers' articles do not contain stereotypes in the lead (e.g. "Mail reader", "Sun reader").) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Houghton Mifflin Harcourt 14:57 +51 Meleager91 talk contribs (ce)
- diffhist Reuters 08:34 −2 Salai Rungtoi talk contribs (→Journalists: fix the correct date) Tag: Visual edit
24 June 2025
- diffhist Apple Inc. 23:55 −26 Guy Harris talk contribs (→1976–1980: Founding and incorporation: Fix silly split of "Steve Jobs" into two separate links to Steve Jobs, one for the first name and one for the last name.)
- diffhist Apple Inc. 21:01 −57 Seasider53 talk contribs (Undid revision 1297215365 by Icaneditalot42 (talk) You inserted the text without discussion. High-profile article, so discuss on talk page first. Also, keep in mind WP:3RR, which you're approaching) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Apple Inc. 20:38 +57 Icaneditalot42 talk contribs (Its a lead, if users want to know basic stuff that's where to put it.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Pearson plc 13:20 +4 86.17.58.180 talk
23 June 2025
- diffhist Module:Authority control/config 21:46 +16 MSGJ talk contribs (update patterns for ADK)
- diffhist Apple Inc. 18:23 −57 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (Undid revision 1297017537 by Icaneditalot42 (talk); redundant) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- diffhist m Apple Inc. 18:08 +57 Icaneditalot42 talk contribs (Be quiet) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist London 10:43 −1,377 AlbusWulfricDumbledore talk contribs (population update) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m Module:Authority control 09:30 +50 MSGJ talk contribs (fix for identifiers containing a space character)
- diffhist Apple Inc. 07:40 −57 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (redundant) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- diffhist All American Television 03:36 +44 123.16.16.56 talk (→External links) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist All American Television 03:34 +45 123.16.16.56 talk Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
22 June 2025
- diffhist Publishers Weekly 18:08 +13 Billjones94 talk contribs (→External links: Using en-dash) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- diffhist m Apple Inc. 14:27 −174 Maxidentx talk contribs (→Charity: removed primary citation) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m Apple Inc. 14:24 +188 Maxidentx talk contribs (→Charity: Fixed citation) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Apple Inc. 14:23 +179 Maxidentx talk contribs (→Charity: Updated source to reflect up to date donations to Product Red) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Apple Inc. 14:18 −224 GSK talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Maxidentx (talk): Not in source provided. Also WP:PRIMARY.) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist Apple Inc. 12:04 +224 Maxidentx talk contribs (→Charity: Updated Product Red section) Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- diffhist m London 08:55 −4 Nampa DC talk contribs (→Transport: typo)
- diffhist London 08:30 +286 Nampa DC talk contribs (→Demography: source building)
- diffhist London 08:22 +626 Nampa DC talk contribs (→Transport: source roads/pedestrians)
- diffhist London 07:42 +17 Nampa DC talk contribs (→Culture: format img size/depiction)
- diffhist St. James Press 02:16 +24 PARAKANYAA talk contribs (Change categorization templates (via redirect-helper))
21 June 2025
- diffhist Apple Inc. 17:01 +83 Icaneditalot42 talk contribs
- diffhist m Subsidiary 15:10 −7 TonySt talk contribs (Reverted edits by 131.226.99.55 (talk) (AV)) Tags: AntiVandal Rollback
- diffhist Subsidiary 15:09 +7 131.226.99.55 talk (→General) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist The Economist 12:55 −73 JMF talk contribs (→Country of the Year: Debold all per mos:bold) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- diffhist London 02:45 −17 Absolutiva talk contribs (Changing short description from "Capital and largest city of both England and the United Kingdom" to "Capital and largest city of the United Kingdom") Tag: Shortdesc helper
- diffhist The Economist 02:12 +6 2001:1970:55db:5c00:c905:ee66:ed37:f2f1 talk (Bolded Bangladesh to fit with rest of countries) Tag: Visual edit
20 June 2025
- diffhist Penguin Random House 22:34 −16 47.202.4.32 talk (→Penguin Publishing Group)
- diffhist The Times 11:56 −710 Eric Schucht talk contribs (Undid revision 1296509665 by 2A02:C7C:F07E:7600:D020:8E3F:AB6B:2F44 (talk)) Tag: Undo
- diffhist The Times 11:30 +710 2a02:c7c:f07e:7600:d020:8e3f:ab6b:2f44 talk (→From 1981) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist m The Economist 10:52 +1 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (minor grammar)
- diffhist The Economist 10:51 +327 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (added hatnote for misuse of citation & explanatory comment for future editors. I keep finding misused sources in this article, so the problem may extend further, I haven't checked everything.) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- diffhist The Economist 10:36 −29 Tomatoswoop talk contribs ("depth" as a reason for brand associations also not in source. (Is the economist known for more depth articles than other news & current affairs mags? the new yorker, new republic, newsweek, Harpers, the spectator, prospect, national review, etc.?) Is this whole article like this? Someone's opinion and vibes with sources added alongside to give it the appearance of factuality?) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist The Economist 10:21 −851 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (yet again, claims not in source, seems to be a persistent problem with this article. (Incidentally, on this particular claim, there are sources already in the article that claim exactly the opposite). Rather than weigh in with a claim to the opposite wrt bias/objectivity, it seems better not to make a statement about it in the lede at all, it's obviously contested at the *least* though.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Apple Inc. 08:45 +708 Blubits talk contribs (→2011–present: Post-Jobs era, Tim Cook: Added the AVP to the history section) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist The Economist 06:22 +934 AnomieBOT talk contribs (Rescuing orphaned refs ("isnewspaper" from rev 1296453716; "Iber-2019" from rev 1296453716))
- diffhist The Economist 04:15 +316 Tomatoswoop talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist The Economist 03:39 +1 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (*as much a newspaper as, I meant to write. Oh to be able to edit edit summaries...)
- diffhist The Economist 03:35 −8 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (I walk the line. The article need not choose. ....I mean it's as much a magazine as the news statesman or private eye or the week or the Spectator or Tribune is really, but hey, porque no los dos! And may the lord spare us from this causing any future edit wars...) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- diffhist The Economist 03:07 −1,118 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (also poorly sourced (and strangely linked, almost to make a point). Maybe it's best just to leave "format" and "type" out of it altogether, it's really not that important) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist The Economist 02:57 +24 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: Last one of these. The one source there that did express a view expressed the opposite one that was previously stated so... Now the article reflects its sources) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist The Economist 02:47 −145 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: yet again, the cited material isn't actually in the sources. One just repeated that the economist calls itself that, another totally off topic. This is so pointless but still, how silly! Someone must have '''really'''' cared about this!) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist The Economist 02:36 −227 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (you know... I'm only even looking at this because of a slightly weird invisible comment that seemed strangely insistent, but now here I am.... Can't find any source for this claim either, and the given source just sends you a link to a database which classes it as a "journal,magazine"! The house of cards from a 15 year old pointless edit war is falling down! 😂) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist The Economist 02:28 −1,526 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (So I can't actually find any source for this claim that doesn't point back here, so I think it's quite probably just made up? Are News Magazines / News Weeklies even legally distinct from Weekly Newspapers in the US or UK at all? idk, but I can't find anything about it...) Tag: Visual edit