Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
8 April 2025
- diffhist m Little's law 04:51 +45 Liedholm s talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Little's law 04:47 +472 Liedholm s talk contribs (I added a sentence about modeling biological populations.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m Little's law 04:22 −6 Liedholm s talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m Little's law 04:21 −6 Liedholm s talk contribs (I changed the format for one of the references (Cohen 2008).) Tag: Visual edit
7 April 2025
- diffhist m Probability distribution 15:40 −1 Malparti talk contribs (Now that the Wikimedia bug has been fixed — thanks Johnbarton for pointing out it was a global bug — clean up some of my previous edits and use consistent rule for linefeeds with <math display="block">)
- diffhist Little's law 08:45 +1,471 Liedholm s talk contribs (I added information on how Little's law relates to demography and population biology.) Tag: Visual edit
5 April 2025
- diffhist Probability distribution 15:26 −18 Johnjbarton talk contribs (Undid revision 1284094867 by Malparti (talk) Thanks but please don't add these line feeds. The MediaWiki server was broken last Thursday and will be repaired "soon") Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Probability distribution 15:06 +18 Malparti talk contribs (fix rendering problems with <math display="block">) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Probability distribution 15:03 +392 Malparti talk contribs (→Random number generation: make things a bit more rigorous + fix rendering problems with display=block + uniformize notations for probabilities + use {{math| }} template for accessibility.)
- diffhist Probability distribution 14:24 +264 Malparti talk contribs (→Introduction: fix bad mistake in CDF + no need to talk about absolutely continuous distributions this early in the article -- especially since there are several little problems with that: (1) the distribution is absolutely continuous, not the random variable; (2) absolutely continuous with respect to what measure? (3) there are continuous distributions that are not absolutely continuous + minor typographic fixes)