Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
3 January 2026
- diffhist Massive open online course 09:35 +29 Altoids0 talk contribs (Adds update maintenance tag, as much of the information in this article dates back to the original advent of MOOCs (2012-2015) and its context as a hyped new tech thing. Coverage would be more neutral if newer sources were included to discuss usage of MOOCs nowadays.)
- diffhist Massive open online course 09:32 −34 Altoids0 talk contribs (Removes LLM maintenance tag, as all LLM-generated text discussed in talk has been removed, rewritten, or given appropriate sources.)
- diffhist Massive open online course 09:26 −812 Altoids0 talk contribs (→Equity and access: Rewrites section to remove the undue weight given to the findings of this single research paper on audio-based MOOCs. Actually adds a reference to the paper mentioned.)
- diffhist Massive open online course 09:11 −13,479 Altoids0 talk contribs (Boldly reorganizes much of the article, as there was a pervasive problem of poorly-cited, long, tangential and LLM-generated paragraphs misleadingly with citations to other, often unrelated sources. Some content was very misplaced, pasted right in the middle of a section non sequitur or not collected with related ideas in the article. Some of it was rewritten with more sources instead of deleted, but this is still largely a TNT. Also adds more wikilinks for the section on ELLs.)
- diffhist Massive open online course 07:48 −1,821 Altoids0 talk contribs (→Pedagogy and course design: Deletes likely LLM-generated section - the main thesis of this section relies on a reference to a paper which is not cited and that I cannot confirm agrees with the claims given. Instead, there are confusing references to a 1960s paper and another later reference which reads as synthesizing another source with this missing one's premise.)