Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
18 July 2025
- diffhist m Falsifiability 14:17 +5 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→A different notion of induction)
- diffhist m Falsifiability 14:15 +8 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Another notion of induction) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 14:09 +22 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (Somehow the the most fundamental aspect of falsifiability, the one which when omitted allows almost all its known criticisms, was removed from the first sentence of the RI.) Tag: Visual edit
17 July 2025
- diffhist Falsifiability 21:06 −749 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (This addition to the RI does not summarize any part of the article. The RI cannot discuss all criticisms. The criticism that falsifiability does not reject false theories can only come from someone who understands that falsifiability says nothing about the (empirical) falsity of a theory. Moreover, this person must fail to take into account that it is impossible to rigorously demonstrate that a theory is (empirically) false. Few people satisfy these conditions. This is a rare criticism.)
- diffhist Falsifiability 19:13 +32 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Ahistorical versus historiographical: Added source) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 19:00 −170 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Ahistorical versus historiographical: ce) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 18:58 −4 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Ahistorical versus historiographical: Correction: Popper used the terminology "metaphysical research program".) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m Falsifiability 16:28 −3 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Ahistorical versus historiographical)
- diffhist m Falsifiability 16:27 +3 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Ahistorical versus historiographical)
- diffhist m Falsifiability 16:25 −28 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Ahistorical versus historiographical)
- diffhist Falsifiability 16:24 +438 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Ahistorical versus historiographical: Added source) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 15:18 +261 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Ahistorical versus historiographical: Added source) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 14:54 +180 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Ahistorical versus historiographical: More facts from sources about the little difference between the final view of Lakatos and Popper's view on how science progress.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Conceptual model 11:11 +27 41.40.114.1 talk (Improved the definition and added a relevant link to a Wikipedia entry in the overview section.) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 05:06 +9 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Notes: The ref cleanup introduced an error message. I removed the nested sfn, because they are shorthand for ref notes and, I believe, ref notes cannot be nested, not in a reflist anyway. If does not remove the error message, I will put them back.)
- diffhist m Falsifiability 04:48 +1 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Notes)
- diffhist m Falsifiability 04:46 −4 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Notes)
- diffhist m Falsifiability 04:38 +1 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Hume's problem)
- diffhist Falsifiability 04:36 +37 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (Undid revision 1300925355 by Dominic Mayers (talk)) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Falsifiability 04:36 −37 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Notes) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Falsifiability 04:33 +386 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Notes: Continuing: moving the note)
- diffhist Falsifiability 04:31 −276 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Hume's problem: Removing note from the body.)
- diffhist m Falsifiability 04:18 −1 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Ahistorical versus historiographical) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 04:16 +251 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Ahistorical versus historiographical: It is incorrect to suggest that research program is a key distinction between Lakatos and Popper. Methodological research programs are also fundamental in Popper's philosophy, but on they exist on the hardly rigorous methodological side, the side that require judgments.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 04:04 −148 Lfstevens talk contribs (ref cleanup) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist m Falsifiability 03:59 −1 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Creativity versus induction) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 03:56 +43 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Creativity versus induction: This is what the source says. The previous version suggested that Feyerabend retracted his general position, which is certainly not true: he always maintained that no such rules exist.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 03:51 −114 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Creativity versus induction: It is certainly not only Popper who rejects an inductive methodology as defined and rejected by Hume and nevertheless desired by Russell, the Vienna Circle, Lakatos, etc. The problem here is that it is very difficult to make a simple general statement, because there are different views on what induction means. If we say something like « induction is generally considered impossible », we have the problem that Bayesian induction is certainly possible, etc.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 03:28 −31 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Routine versus revolutionary science: Clarify the distinction between Kuhn and Popper.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 03:20 −40 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Routine versus revolutionary science: On the contrary, the distinction made by Popper between the logical and methodological sides was mostly ignored by his students Feyerabend, Lakatos and Kuhn, maybe less by Kuhn, but still Kuhn main philosophy certainly did not incorporate that distinction.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 02:54 −504 Lfstevens talk contribs (→Normal science versus revolutionary science: ce) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m Falsifiability 02:37 +15 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→State of affairs as falsifier versus actual falsification) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 02:34 −359 Lfstevens talk contribs (→Normal science versus revolutionary science: ce) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Falsifiability 02:33 +29 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→State of affairs as falsifier versus actual falsification: The purpose of a state of affairs used as a falsifier is not to prevent the use of methodological arguments and thus to protect theories. It is almost the opposite. It is itself immune to these methodological considerations, because it is a logical concept. Moreover, it serves to define falsifiability, a condition that makes methodological critiques possible, which is the opposite of preventing them.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 02:21 +13 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (Undid revision 1300910127 by Lfstevens (talk) The "versus" makes no sense between State of affairs and actual falsification.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Falsifiability 02:17 −13 Lfstevens talk contribs (→State of affairs as falsifier versus actual falsification) Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 02:17 −330 Lfstevens talk contribs (→State of affairs as falsifier versus actual falsification: ce) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Falsifiability 01:35 −226 Lfstevens talk contribs (→Ahistorical versus historiographical: ce) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Falsifiability 00:25 −461 Lfstevens talk contribs (→Methodless creativity versus inductive methodology: ce) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
16 July 2025
- diffhist m Falsifiability 15:55 −9 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Methodological falsificationism) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m Falsifiability 15:54 +3 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Methodological falsificationism) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 15:51 −124 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Naive falsificationism: That sentence made no sense in that context. On the contrary, Lakatos question was how to justify a theory or a research program given that we accept these methodological decisions.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 15:46 +27 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Naive falsificationism: Again the key word is not corroborated, but the fact that the theory has shown its practical merit.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 15:42 +19 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Naive falsificationism: Reverse order of two sentences, because one is a response to the other.)
- diffhist Falsifiability 15:39 +2 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Naive falsificationism: The sentence was not verified at all in the source provided.)
- diffhist Falsifiability 15:32 −61 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Sophisticated falsificationism: More focused sentence.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m Falsifiability 15:29 −5 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Lakatos' falsificationism{{anchor|Falsificationism|Dogmatic falsificationism|Naive falsificationism|Sophisticated falsificationism}})
- diffhist Falsifiability 15:19 +1 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Naive falsificationism: Corroborations was not the correct word. The sources refer more to practical applications.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 15:12 +85 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Popperian falsificationism: Clarification.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Falsifiability 15:08 +2 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Popperian falsificationism: Back to a subsection of Lakatos's falsificationism even if it isn't, because the discussion explains how they are related.) Tag: Visual edit