Jump to content

Related changes

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.

Recent changes optionsShow last 50 | 100 | 250 | 500 changes in last 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 30 days
Hide registered users | Hide unregistered users | Hide my edits | Show bots | Hide minor edits | Show page categorization | Show Wikidata | Hide probably good edits
Show new changes starting from 10:46, 26 July 2025
 
Page name:
List of abbreviations (help):
D
Edit made at Wikidata
r
Edit flagged by ORES
N
New page
m
Minor edit
b
Bot edit
(±123)
Page byte size change
Temporarily watched page

25 July 2025

24 July 2025

23 July 2025

22 July 2025

21 July 2025

20 July 2025

  • diffhist Compact disc 22:22 +24 Concord19 talk contribs (Disc shapes and diameters: Switching order so that the source is identified prior to his assertion. This arrangement helps to prevent a reader from seeing the assertion as hard established uncontested fact. Immink's version of the story is that 12cm was selected due to it being a neutral size [one source being YouTube at v=djjZ64-LsVM&t=2m25s]. Also providing info as to what Immink's position was, instead of presenting just some random name.)
  • diffhist Compact disc 22:11 +39 Concord19 talk contribs (Disc shapes and diameters: "begins at the center of the disc"? The center of the disc is an empty hole. How long has this article been presenting such nonsense to the public? And why has no one corrected this? Well it is fixed now.)

19 July 2025

  • diffhist Design 22:18 +210 Cl3phact0 talk contribs (re-introducing Brionvega RR126 photo (no comment concerning removal of the design vs. art text; let's keep the great photo)
  • diffhist Design 22:04 −780 Ozzycabob talk contribs (I think we should just get rid of this "Relationship with the art Section entirely". It's basically just asking "Is Design considered Art?" which is just opinions. This article is focused on design. It should stay focused on design. Having at the very end "the distinction between art and design is blurry but ..." doesn't tell the reader anything. It just needlessly raises a question. Thus it should be removed) Tag: Visual edit