Related changes

13 July 2025

• diffhist Mathematical logic 23:14 −4 Trovatore talk contribs (Undid revision 1300363491 by 2601:204:D100:F5B0:1089:1862:1796:D986 (talk) no, we don't do that here) Tag: Undo
• diffhist Mathematical logic 22:19 +4 2601:204:d100:f5b0:1089:1862:1796:d986 talk (Fixed a recursive loop in the Wikipedia "philosophy" game.) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Disambiguation links added
• diffhist m Computer programming 14:54 +2 Mindmatrix talk contribs (strong -> prevalent)

12 July 2025

• diffhist List of mathematical functions 19:46 +3 Briarsong talk contribs (→Algebraic functions: definition changed to agree with standard practice and Wikipedia itself (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_function). Also internal consistency, under the prior definition rational functions are not algebraic, although they are listed as algebraic (correctly, under the standard definition).)
• diffhist Computer programming 03:22 −6 Vectorange talk contribs (→Measuring language usage)

11 July 2025

• diffhist Binary relation 14:50 +8 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (period after sentence) Tag: Visual edit

10 July 2025

• diffhist Analytic function 09:22 −1 84.24.159.67 talk (→Alternative characterizations: Remove lineskip for clarity)

9 July 2025

• diffhist Binary relation 16:57 +448 AnomieBOT talk contribs (Rescuing orphaned refs ("gs" from rev 1299645176; "Schroder.1895" from rev 1299645176; "Lewis.1918" from rev 1299645176))
• diffhist Binary relation 16:29 −39 D.Lazard talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Villaida (talk): Duplicate) Tags: Twinkle Undo
• diffhist Binary relation 16:28 +39 Villaida talk contribs (fixed ref list error) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Binary relation 16:27 −10 D.Lazard talk contribs (→Notes: + {{notelist}})
• diffhist Binary relation 16:25 −16 D.Lazard talk contribs (→Definition: {{efn}})
• diffhist Binary relation 16:16 −1,118 D.Lazard talk contribs (shortening the lead (The calculus of relations is too specialized and too technical for the lead))
• diffhist Binary relation 15:59 +37 D.Lazard talk contribs (→top: ce)
• diffhist Binary relation 15:41 −1,606 D.Lazard talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Dragomang87 (talk): The lead is already too long. The lead must not use terms such as "symmetric relation" without definition) Tags: Twinkle Undo
• diffhist Binary relation 15:04 +1,606 Dragomang87 talk contribs (Improved text, clarity and separation of concepts: separating prime from integers is a bad way of creating a non-homogeneous relation because the page for the divide relation is indeed homogeneous, also the definition as subset and element of power set was mixed with the definition of homogeneous, while the power-set related operations where on a separate paragraphs) Tag: Reverted

8 July 2025

• diffhist Semi-continuity 16:08 +7 2601:204:f181:9410:6d18:79a7:3041:62d2 talk (→Examples: function limits → limits of the function)
• diffhist Continuous function 15:49 +19 2601:204:f181:9410:6d18:79a7:3041:62d2 talk (→Semicontinuity)
• diffhist Continuous function 15:46 +42 2601:204:f181:9410:6d18:79a7:3041:62d2 talk (→Directional Continuity: Improved wording)

7 July 2025

• diffhist Set (mathematics) 21:00 +3 D.Lazard talk contribs (→Algebra of subsets: "The set" refers to U, not to any subset)
• diffhist Integer 14:40 −1 Anita5192 talk contribs (Undid revision 1299272761 by Kencf0618 (talk)not helpful) Tag: Undo
• diffhist Integer 12:15 +1 Kencf0618 talk contribs (Encyclopedic tone and accuracy.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 10:17 +8 Jochen Burghardt talk contribs (Undid revision 1299255997 by D.Lazard (talk): agree with Ifoundamistake75475: A \Delta A = (A \ A) \cup (A \ A) = {} \cup {} = {}, i.e. the additive inverse, while A \Delta A' = (A \ A') \cup (A' \ A) = A \cup A' = U, when A' denotes the absolute complement) Tag: Undo
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 09:28 −8 D.Lazard talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Ifoundamistake75475 (talk): Was corect) Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 06:39 +8 Ifoundamistake75475 talk contribs (→Algebra of subsets: I believe I found a mistake. In the boolean ring that is the powerset of a given set, when you are using the additive operation (symmetric difference), the additive inverse (a number x such that a+x=0 for all a) is not its complement, as by applying symmetric difference (any elements contained in two sets but not both), you can see that the complement (all elements not a part of A is the complement of A) when added to a set results in simply the union (all elements a p...) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit