Related changes
Appearance
← ISWIM
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
12 July 2025
- diffhist m Syntactic sugar 22:19 +151 AhtoTsero talk contribs (Add links to other Wikipedia articles to my previous edit.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Syntactic sugar 22:15 −151 AhtoTsero talk contribs (Make the first example of syntactic sugar (hopefully) much easier to understand by using Python code as an example and avoiding words that are too mathy.) Tag: Visual edit
11 July 2025
- Deletion log 17:03 ScottishFinnishRadish talk contribs changed visibility of 2 revisions on page Haskell: edit summary hidden (RD2: Serious BLP violations)
10 July 2025
- diffhist Programming language 15:22 −2 2a01:cb04:328:b900:6036:6424:ba6b:e38e talk (Fix typo)
9 July 2025
- diffhist Programming language 13:06 −2 Stevebroshar talk contribs (better word)
- diffhist Programming language 13:04 −408 Stevebroshar talk contribs (Element is overly generic; I see language definition and features; and this allows removing the jarring stuff from the into)
- diffhist Programming language 12:50 −21 Stevebroshar talk contribs (→Semantics: get to the point)
- diffhist Programming language 12:42 −579 Stevebroshar talk contribs (This whole paragraph is uncited and low-value; in particular: exception handling is covered later; prog lang theory is better handled as see-also (which it already is))
- diffhist Programming language 12:37 −40 Stevebroshar talk contribs (It's not just simplicity; it's about quality! Better software)
- diffhist Programming language 12:33 −277 Stevebroshar talk contribs (→Classifications: if scripting is a category then it should be another item; regardless it should be a side-note of imperative)
- diffhist Programming language 12:27 +48 Stevebroshar talk contribs (→Classifications: Edit for better organization; stuff and the end was not well integrated)
- diffhist Programming language 12:13 −582 Stevebroshar talk contribs (This section is not so much about the definition of prog lang as it is how that term relates to other terms: natural language, computer language and formal specification langauge) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- diffhist Programming language 11:54 +400 Stevebroshar talk contribs (It's about _source code_ regardless of whether it's for a program; a compiler/interpreter is not an _implementation_ of a language yet some automated process (i.e. compiler/interpreter) is required to use source code) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Programming language 11:31 +22 Stevebroshar talk contribs (it _can_ be described in many (other) ways than syntax and semantics ... a formal lang is another way to describe it or even define it.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Programming language 11:28 +1 Stevebroshar talk contribs (it's for controlling a _computer_; not any ol' machine (yes sometimes we call a computer a machine but that's inaccurate))
- diffhist Programming language 11:27 −18 Stevebroshar talk contribs ('instructions' is overly specific (implies command/imperative); it's about control (however that's conveyed))
- diffhist Programming language 11:25 +28 Stevebroshar talk contribs (→Definitions: Reword for accuracy; it's not for communicating with _all_ machines; only computers ... although there are other differences (i.e. syntax) intension is a big difference; prog lang is for _controlling_)
- diffhist Programming language 11:20 +46 Stevebroshar talk contribs (Singular is better than plural)
7 July 2025
- diffhist m Lambda calculus 02:49 +2 Himaldrmann talk contribs (→Lambda calculus and programming languages: copyedit)