Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
6 June 2025
- diffhist Bures metric 11:02 +10 Kavahox talk contribs
- diffhist Bures metric 10:56 +30 Kavahox talk contribs
2 June 2025
- diffhist Mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics 18:07 +113 Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction talk contribs (bring Weyl's book out of "further reading" and into the proper references)
- diffhist Mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics 18:00 +44 Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction talk contribs (Weyl's book came out the year after his paper)
- diffhist Mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics 17:55 −213 Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction talk contribs (→Problem of measurement: remove vague and interpretation-dependent claim)
- diffhist Mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics 17:53 +57 Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction talk contribs (→Time evolution of a system: rephrase to avoid unsupported claims about what is most common)
- diffhist Mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics 17:48 +11 Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction talk contribs (→Description of the state of a system: modify phrasing)
- diffhist Mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics 17:44 +26 Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction talk contribs (→See also: add quantum foundations)
- diffhist Mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics 17:42 −1,507 Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction talk contribs (remove bullet point that should be supported by books/review articles rather than original papers, to avoid accepting the claims of the original authors as definitive (tacit background assumptions are all over the place in this literature); also, disassembling and reconstructing the formalism doesn't really belong on the same list as, e.g, proving the uncertainty principle)