Jump to content

Related changes

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.

Recent changes options Show last 50 | 100 | 250 | 500 changes in last 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 30 days
Hide registered users | Hide unregistered users | Hide my edits | Show bots | Hide minor edits | Show page categorization | Show Wikidata | Hide probably good edits
Show new changes starting from 19:13, 10 April 2025
 
Page name:
List of abbreviations (help):
D
Edit made at Wikidata
r
Edit flagged by ORES
N
New page
m
Minor edit
b
Bot edit
(±123)
Page byte size change
Temporarily watched page

10 April 2025

9 April 2025

8 April 2025

7 April 2025

6 April 2025

5 April 2025

  • diffhist m Archduke 10:26 −29 Aezumin talk contribs (A grand duke was a royal, just like a king, thus was on par with an archduke. Their meaning in the language of origin was a 'great ruler', thus a ruler of other rulers (lording over dukes/princes).)
  • diffhist Grand prince 10:23 −265 Aezumin talk contribs (Removed certain unsourced text which could be misleading, as a Grand Prince is often interchanged with Grand Duke, and throughout its historical origins was a royal title of non-English origins.)
  • diffhist m Template:Imperial, royal, noble and chivalric ranks 10:18 −55 Aezumin talk contribs (Repetitions of Duke, etc. across two different branches. Merged ducal-tier titles into the ducal branch. Moved royal dukes (archduke, grand duke/prince) into king-tier, as their primary historical origins are kingly (e.g. Grand Duchy of Lithuania), and the Archduke was also on-par with HRE kings.)
  • diffhist Grand duke 10:13 −386 Aezumin talk contribs (Mentions of "order of precedence" are unsourced, historically oversimplified (because precedence varied a lot across time, region, and context [imperial courts, international diplomacy, etc.]), and potentially misleading (especially by lumping in “sovereign duke” and “sovereign prince” without clarifying that those titles could also denote independent rulers [e.g., Duke of Savoy, Prince of Monaco] who weren’t necessarily lower in status).)
  • diffhist Squire 00:07 +1 2600:1700:57aa:1190:502e:6fa5:a3ae:ed2e talk (Squire)

4 April 2025

3 April 2025