Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
23 April 2025
- diffhist User talk:Diannaa 11:41 +249 Diannaa talk contribs (→Ross Rizal page: already done) Tag: Reply
- diffhist User talk:Diannaa 09:02 +509 Abminor talk contribs (→Ross Rizal page: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Preorder 03:35 +4 Goodphy talk contribs (Made Equivalence class as a link to the corresponding Wikipedia page.) Tag: Visual edit
22 April 2025
- diffhist m Binary relation 22:04 +31 MathThrowaway talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Binary relation 21:59 +237 MathThrowaway talk contribs (Added graphic for binary relation) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m Kosaraju's algorithm 17:09 +3 Ftiercel talk contribs (Typo) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Binary relation 16:05 −8 D.Lazard talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Senomo Drines (talk): Reders of this article are supposed to have read the hatnote or have followed the link to set (mathematics) given in the first sentence. If you disagree, take it on the talk page) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist Binary relation 15:57 +8 Senomo Drines talk contribs (Undid revision 1286817173 by TakuyaMurata (talk) Why would a reader implicitly assume repetition of the same pair does not happen? They are not a mathematician, we are talking about the average reader. Your analogy is also odd because the phrase "set of different people" works just fine, it just means a set of people with differing characteristics.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist User talk:Diannaa 13:44 −341 Diannaa talk contribs (→Disambiguation link notification for April 22: done) Tag: Manual revert
- diffhist Binary relation 04:50 −9 TakuyaMurata talk contribs (different is also very weird; you don't say a set of different people. You just say a set of people (since we implicitly assume there is no repetition))
- diffhist Binary relation 04:47 +33 Senomo Drines talk contribs (This is getting semantical, but I removed it regardless.)
- diffhist Binary relation 04:44 −48 TakuyaMurata talk contribs (Undid revision 1286807131 by Senomo Drines (talk) i''m very tempted to rever this; e.g., represent isn't a standard terminology) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Binary relation 03:01 +48 Senomo Drines talk contribs (Undid revision 1286726092 by D.Lazard (talk) It is still unclear whether or not it is referring to x and y as an "element" or as a "subset" of X and Y. An unknowing reader can interpret this as the cumulative set of x, y, rather than the set of differing pairs of x, y. Clarification is absolutely needed; ambiguity leads to wrongful conjecture.) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist User talk:Diannaa 00:15 −4,342 Diannaa talk contribs (→Tech News: 2025-17: done) Tag: Manual revert
21 April 2025
- diffhist Binary relation 16:36 −48 D.Lazard talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Senomo Drines (talk): "x in S" is not vague. It the standard way to say that x is an element of of the set S. You can verify this by reading any text on mathematical sets) Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
- diffhist Binary relation 15:40 +48 Senomo Drines talk contribs (If clarification is needed, then x and y should clarify to be elements, being "in" a set is uncomfortably vague.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Binary relation 14:48 −264 D.Lazard talk contribs (Undid revision 1286707691 by Senomo Drines (talk) this change is very confusing as relying on undefined (in this context) concepts of combination and pairing. Added twice "some" for clarification)
- diffhist Binary relation 14:27 +275 Senomo Drines talk contribs (Its difficult to differentiate whether it is talking about the elements of a set or the pairing between the elements of the sets.)
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Be bold 03:00 −17 Anaconda2165 talk contribs (Reworded a sentence)
- diffhist User talk:Diannaa 01:29 −1,341 Diannaa talk contribs (→Nomination of Battle of St. Pölten for deletion: ok) Tag: Manual revert
18 April 2025
- diffhist User talk:Diannaa 11:15 +212 Diannaa talk contribs (→Bellano: checked) Tag: Reply
- diffhist User talk:Diannaa 02:40 +272 176.108.139.1 talk (→Bellano: new section) Tag: New topic
17 April 2025
- diffhist Preorder 05:57 0 207.174.167.55 talk (→Definition: Fixed spacing around the \in symbol)