Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
17 July 2025
- diffhist High Court of Australia 11:11 −2 Errantios talk contribs (→Composition: "puisne" is not standard usage for the HCA)
- diffhist High Court of Australia 08:33 +12 Patrick181918 talk contribs (→Composition: total number of justices)
- diffhist High Court of Australia 08:25 +12 Patrick181918 talk contribs (→Appointment process, composition, and working conditions: removed duplication of 1977 referendum)
16 July 2025
- diffhist Separation of powers 16:22 +23 TheUzbek talk contribs
- diffhist Separation of powers 16:22 +152 TheUzbek talk contribs
- diffhist Parliament of Australia 02:37 0 210.10.2.190 talk
14 July 2025
- diffhist m Referendums in Australia 20:05 −1 Timrollpickering talk contribs (clean up) Tag: AWB
11 July 2025
- diffhist Separation of powers 17:14 −407 LegesFundamentales talk contribs (→Montesquieu's separation of powers system: Again, this statement is misleadingly decontextualized. The source discusses why a self-interested political ruler would divest himself of the power to settle disputes, saying it is because judging in favor of someone doesn't make them grateful, but judging against them makes them angry. Holmes only off-handedly mentions, in a single sentence, that (allegedly; no citation is given) "Montesquieu" (he may have meant Machiavelli; the source is poorl...) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- diffhist Separation of powers 16:48 −156 LegesFundamentales talk contribs (→Montesquieu's separation of powers system: This statement is far broader and bolder than is verifiable. The citation – J. M. Maravall & A. Przeworski, "Introduction", in Maravall & Przeworski, Democracy and the Rule of Law (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003), pp. 1–16 (at pp. 12–13) – only alleges that the judiciary was seen as the most important power in France in the second half of the 16th cent. (Maravall/Przeworski allude to B. Fontana, "The Rule of Law and the Problem of Legal Reform in Mi...) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit