Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
3 June 2025
- diffhist Singapore 15:06 +75 Greensminded24 talk contribs (→Culture) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization 05:49 +14,130 Frost talk contribs (Reverted edit by Selina Newton (talk) to last version by EX Aero) Tag: Rollback
- diffhist Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization 05:48 −14,130 Selina Newton talk contribs (←Blanked the page) Tags: Blanking Reverted
1 June 2025
- diffhist CMOS 21:57 −380 Isaacl talk contribs (→History: copy edit to align with summary of cited source, which describes the use of silicon dioxide as a mask during the doping process, and not an active part of the transistor; copy edit for clarity)
- diffhist CMOS 16:30 +27 ToBeFree talk contribs (Adding {{pp-protected}}) Tag: Twinkle
- Protection log 16:30 ToBeFree talk contribs protected CMOS [Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 16:30, 1 September 2025) (Persistent disruptive editing) (hist) Tag: Twinkle
- diffhist m CMOS 14:56 +4,812 Remsense talk contribs (Reverted 2 edits by 95.70.115.64 (talk) to last revision by Remsense) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist CMOS 14:56 −165 95.70.115.64 talk (More misinformation from Wikian. CMOS was invented in 1963, not 1948.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist CMOS 14:55 −4,647 95.70.115.64 talk (Carl Frosch did NOT invent the MOSFET or CMOS. This is straight-up misinformation being regurgitated by Wikian across multiple articles. This lie is not backed by any of the sources he cites. Read the actual sources. None of them claim Frosch invented MOSFET.) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist CMOS 14:10 +4,647 Remsense talk contribs (Undid revision 1293400596 by Remsense (talk)) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist CMOS 13:59 −4,647 Remsense talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Remsense (talk)) Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
- diffhist m CMOS 13:59 +4,647 Remsense talk contribs (Reverted 3 edits by 95.70.115.64 (talk) to last revision by 76.66.97.192) Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
- diffhist CMOS 13:55 +4 95.70.115.64 talk (→History) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist CMOS 13:55 −422 95.70.115.64 talk (→History: Removing original research by Wikain, who has repeatedly abused WP:OR, WP:SYNTH and misrepresented sources across multiple articles.) Tags: Reverted references removed
- diffhist CMOS 13:51 −4,229 95.70.115.64 talk (→History: Removed original research by Wikain. None of this has any relevance to CMOS, and the claims here misrepresent what the sources actually say.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Categorization 07:12 −36 Jc37 talk contribs (rv - section header uses diffuse) Tag: Undo
31 May 2025
- diffhist Singapore 06:41 −244 MordukhovichAleakin talk contribs (removed unclear footnote, see talk)
- diffhist Singapore 00:17 −10 QwertyZ34 talk contribs (Undid revision 1292870859 by MordukhovichAleakin (talk) No reason given) Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
30 May 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Categorization 18:19 −11 David Eppstein talk contribs (Undid revision 1293050447 by CapnZapp (talk) does not need more of an explanation here) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Categorization 11:00 +11 CapnZapp talk contribs (→Non-diffusing subcategories: see talk) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Categorization 10:49 +3 CapnZapp talk contribs (→Non-diffusing subcategories: "will" indicates that they somehow disappear automatically, but that's not what we mean) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Categorization 10:47 +34 CapnZapp talk contribs (→Diffusing large categories: the template we tell readers to use to "diffuse" categories doesn't use that term itself!) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Categorization 10:44 −1 CapnZapp talk contribs (→Diffusing large categories: "possible" = yes it is technically possible, but that's not what we mean here - we mean it is permissible (by guidelines and policies)) Tag: Reverted