Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Doomsdayer520 (talk | contribs) at 14:52, 23 October 2026 (→Uncontroversial technical requests: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to Requested moves/Technical requests

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request a technical move below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."


If you are here because you want an experienced editor to approve of your new article or proposed rename, you are in the wrong place.

To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection or click the big blue button and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Do not edit the article's talk page, just click the button below.

To request a reversion of a recent undiscussed move: Review the guidelines at WP:RMUM of whether a reversion of an undiscussed move qualifies as uncontroversial and if so, edit the Requests to revert undiscussed moves subsection or click the big blue button and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

Note that in some cases, clerks, such as administrators or page movers may determine that your request for a reversion does not pass the criteria and may move the request to the contested section or open a formal requested move discussion for potentially controversial moves on your behalf.

  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page. A bot will automatically remove contested requests after 72 hours of inactivity.
Administration needed

If your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been fully protected or move protected (see this guide to which moves need administrators).

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

@Passepar2: This request has been sitting here for much longer than usual, and I suspect that the regulars here (including me) are avoiding it because both the current title and requested title appear to be legitimate. Consider initiating a "Proposed Move" discussion among experts at the article's Talk page. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 20:15, 22 October 2026 (UTC)reply
@Doomsdayer520: Thank you for the note - would it help to say that I am an expert in the topic area (genetics PhD) and can attest that the proposed change is consistent with contemporary scientific usage? I didn't mention that above because it feels suspect to claim authority on a topic based on a credential, but mentioning it here in case it helps resolve the move request. Thanks! Passepar2 (talk) 21:07, 22 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Yes, state your credentials on the Talk page to start the process that I suggested, and that will inform the discussion. As another academic myself, I predict some controversy but it should be respectful among scientists. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:52, 23 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

Billboard has is as "Koe Wetzel & Ella Langley", and I'm definitely giving more weight to that. 162 etc. (talk) 01:31, 23 October 2026 (UTC)reply
@Paperswanflourishing We do not use ALL CAPS in titles (unless it's an acronym or something). Thanks! —1isall (talk | contribs) 00:48, 23 October 2026 (UTC)reply
@Alexandrianscrolls No other article exists on Wikipedia that shares the title "BK Stjernen"; there is no need for disambiguation. Annh07 (talk) 10:58, 23 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Administrator needed