Time loop logic: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 22:1422:14, 5 June 2017 Tom.Reding talk contribs m 244 bytes +34 +{{Redirect category shell}} using AWB undo

curprev 12:1712:17, 31 May 2016 BrightR talk contribs 210 bytes 0 ←Redirected page to Novikov self-consistency principle#Time-loop logic undo

curprev 17:2517:25, 28 February 2011 Cydebot talk contribs m 210 bytes +1 Robot - Moving category Computational models to Models of computation per CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 February 19. undo

curprev 23:4523:45, 27 July 2008 84.215.111.81 talk 2,639 bytes +43 No edit summary undo
curprev 20:4620:46, 27 July 2008 Granburguesa talk contribs 2,596 bytes +13 clarifying the topic is hypothetical undo

curprev 06:0106:01, 22 June 2008 User6985 talk contribs 2,583 bytes −35 It does cite a reference or source, this tag is inaccurate. Can't speak to notability, don't intend to. undo

curprev 05:3905:39, 23 January 2008 122.148.218.27 talk 2,618 bytes +3 It survived an AfD on this basis, and therefore the presumption shifts to it being notable. You've made no attempt to reach consensus on the talk page to alter the previous ADF no consensus! undo

curprev 04:5904:59, 22 January 2008 V-train talk contribs m 2,615 bytes −1 Reverted 1 edit by JJJ999; As I said, no one has to prove it is not notable; the article needs to show why it IS, and it has NO sources. (TW) undo
curprev 03:2503:25, 22 January 2008 JJJ999 talk contribs 2,616 bytes +1 An Admin adding the tag is not an argument, let someone produce one for why it is not notable... to date, nothing. I have no vested interest, I don't know this guy, but this is arbitrary +unjustified undo

curprev 05:1205:12, 21 January 2008 V-train talk contribs m 2,615 bytes +33 Reverted 1 edit by JJJ999; Uh, an article has to show why it is notable, not vice versa; as stated many times, an admin added the tag. (TW) undo
curprev 05:0705:07, 21 January 2008 JJJ999 talk contribs 2,582 bytes −33 There has been monthsand months for someone to provide a consensus or justification this is of dubious noteworthiness, I have been on the talk page, no effort from critics at all.Need more than "gist" undo

curprev 12:1112:11, 20 January 2008 86.164.186.238 talk 2,615 bytes +1 spelling undo

curprev 04:0004:00, 10 January 2008 122.148.218.27 talk 2,614 bytes −32 nothing of the sort has been suggested on either the linked page or the main talk page. As such it should go. the critics of this page have never produced any reasoned argument against it, for shame undo
curprev 03:3203:32, 10 January 2008 190.74.108.43 talk 2,646 bytes +32 No edit summary undo

curprev 08:1108:11, 27 December 2007 Doczilla talk contribs 2,614 bytes −1 clean up using AWB undo

curprev 02:3602:36, 27 November 2007 V-train talk contribs 2,615 bytes +33 rv: As I stated repeatedly, the admin added the tags and explained why on the AfD page; 3 people have reverted your edits, if you want them removed YOU can propose such on the talk page undo
curprev 02:2902:29, 27 November 2007 JJJ999 talk contribs 2,582 bytes −33 Undid revision 172741970 by V-train (talk) there isn't anything in the discussion page from you guys, until there is no tags undo

curprev 18:1518:15, 20 November 2007 V-train talk contribs 2,615 bytes +33 Undid revision 172694939 by JJJ999 (talk) undo
curprev 13:2713:27, 20 November 2007 JJJ999 talk contribs m 2,582 bytes −33 No edit summary undo

curprev 00:4600:46, 12 November 2007 V-train talk contribs 2,615 bytes +33 rv: It is not my opinion that an ADMIN added the tags, and specifically mentioned that the article has notability issues when he closed the AfD. undo
curprev 00:3200:32, 12 November 2007 JJJ999 talk contribs 2,582 bytes −33 Undid revision 170793490 by V-train (talk)Your opinion maybe, nothing on talk page, reads as "I don't know anything about science" undo

curprev 18:4318:43, 11 November 2007 V-train talk contribs 2,615 bytes +33 rv: It did not "pass" AfD, there was no consensus. It was the admin who closed the AfD himself that put the tag on. Besides which, surviving AfD does not automatically make it notable. undo
curprev 07:0507:05, 11 November 2007 JJJ999 talk contribs 2,582 bytes −33 Your personal opinion is moot, it passed an AfD on this basis, therefore until good reasons are given, preferably on the talk page, you can't just insert this tag. undo
curprev 00:3400:34, 11 November 2007 Intgr talk contribs 2,615 bytes +2 move stub tag so categories would be in succession undo
curprev 00:2400:24, 11 November 2007 Sesshomaru talk contribs 2,613 bytes +56 partial revert on tag, may not meet the notability requirements undo

curprev 04:2404:24, 10 November 2007 V-train talk contribs 2,557 bytes +36 No sources undo
curprev 00:3300:33, 10 November 2007 JJJ999 talk contribs 2,521 bytes −69 Undid revision 169292353 by Intgr (talk) Yes it does. You pass an AfD on the basis of notability,you at least get the presumption of it undo

curprev 02:2702:27, 5 November 2007 Intgr talk contribs 2,590 bytes +69 stop making up your own rules; a single source is not enough to establish notability, passing AfD just means that the article isn't deleted (for now) undo

curprev 14:5614:56, 4 November 2007 JJJ999 talk contribs 2,521 bytes −36 No edit summary undo

curprev 06:3806:38, 15 October 2007 JJJ999 talk contribs 2,557 bytes +96 No edit summary undo

curprev 10:4010:40, 13 October 2007 JJJ999 talk contribs 2,461 bytes −33 notability tag should be removed post debate in AfD undo

curprev 15:4415:44, 11 October 2007 SmackBot talk contribs m 2,494 bytes +34 Date/fix the maintenance tags or gen fixes undo
curprev 15:3815:38, 11 October 2007 Andrew c talk contribs 2,460 bytes −182 rm AfD header, closed as no consensus, replace with notability and unsourced tags undo

curprev 19:3319:33, 1 October 2007 Cruftbane talk contribs 2,642 bytes +212 Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time loop logic. using TW undo

curprev 08:5208:52, 18 April 2007 213.164.164.164 talk 2,430 bytes +37 No edit summary undo

curprev 05:3005:30, 3 March 2007 69.157.118.192 talk 2,393 bytes +21 No edit summary undo

curprev 00:3300:33, 8 July 2006 Bryan Derksen talk contribs 2,372 bytes +92 link Ontological paradox undo

curprev 14:5114:51, 3 July 2006 Intgr talk contribs 2,280 bytes +13 Added 'Example' heading undo

curprev 23:0823:08, 27 June 2006 GHe talk contribs 2,267 bytes +2,149 Revert to revision 60923829 dated 2006-06-27 23:08:40 by AntiVandalBot using popups undo
curprev 23:0823:08, 27 June 2006 207.200.116.11 talk 118 bytes −2,149 fuck you. undo
curprev 23:0823:08, 27 June 2006 AntiVandalBot talk contribs m 2,267 bytes +2,149 BOT - rv 207.200.116.11 (talk) to last version by 80.118.33.228 undo
curprev 23:0823:08, 27 June 2006 207.200.116.11 talk 118 bytes −2,149 fuck you. undo

curprev 16:2616:26, 9 December 2005 80.118.33.228 talk 2,267 bytes +38 No edit summary undo

curprev 15:3315:33, 22 July 2004 Bryan Derksen talk contribs m 2,229 bytes 0 numbers instead of bullets, since this is an ordered sequence undo

curprev 18:4518:45, 7 July 2004 Kate talk contribs m 2,229 bytes −2 (External links) Correct indentation level and/or fix capitalisation undo

5 June 2017

31 May 2016

28 February 2011

28 July 2008

27 July 2008

22 June 2008

23 January 2008

22 January 2008

21 January 2008

20 January 2008

10 January 2008

27 December 2007

27 November 2007

20 November 2007

12 November 2007

11 November 2007

10 November 2007

5 November 2007

4 November 2007

15 October 2007

13 October 2007

11 October 2007

1 October 2007

18 April 2007

3 March 2007

8 July 2006

3 July 2006

27 June 2006

9 December 2005

22 July 2004

7 July 2004