Jump to content

Linear no-threshold model: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

25 May 2025

15 May 2025

26 April 2025

5 April 2025

20 March 2025

19 March 2025

14 March 2025

14 February 2025

14 January 2025

25 July 2024

23 July 2024

  • curprev 05:1705:17, 23 July 2024 Avatar317 talk contribs 38,874 bytes −371 Removed WP:OR. The EPA link (available on archive here: https://web.archive.org/web/20080408004626/https://www.epa.gov/safewater/contaminants/dw_contamfs/pcbs.html) never mentions LNT. Also removed lead statement, as nowhere else in this article is there mention of chemical hazards. undo
  • curprev 04:2904:29, 23 July 2024 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 39,245 bytes +30 Dating maintenance tags: {{Who}} {{Cn}} undo
  • curprev 04:0304:03, 23 July 2024 Avatar317 talk contribs 39,215 bytes +33 The NRC and EPA are government regulators. I'll look at those paragraphs and add names here. undo
  • curprev 03:5503:55, 23 July 2024 Avatar317 talk contribs 39,182 bytes +7 The scientific organizations which support this should be specified, because the structure of this article has a HUGE "Controversy" section, so these supporting organizations should be named in the lead. Or we could create a section "Organizations which support/adopted LNT" would answer this question. undo
  • curprev 03:5003:50, 23 July 2024 Avatar317 talk contribs 39,175 bytes +6 Added citation needed flag to "Scientific organizations generally support use of the LNT model, particularly for optimization" because it is not at all obvious from a scan of this article which orgs are meant and where the sources for that statement are. Per WP:LEADCITE ..."any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports it." - There is no section titled "Organizations which suppo undo
  • curprev 03:4203:42, 23 July 2024 Avatar317 talk contribs 39,169 bytes −1,873 Controversy: Removed Original Research WP:OR. None of these three sources appear to mention LNT, but rather this paragraph seems like someone's OR. I cannot see the whole studies, but the abstracts don't make any mention that the studies were investigating LNT. If Ramsar is "often quoted as being a counter example to LNT" than we need a source that says that and only include info about Ramsar from that source. undo

20 July 2024

19 July 2024

18 July 2024

15 June 2024

14 June 2024

13 June 2024

7 May 2024

29 March 2024

17 March 2024

3 March 2024

2 March 2024

26 November 2023

22 November 2023

19 November 2023

21 August 2023

6 February 2023

30 January 2023

10 January 2023

13 December 2022

19 September 2022

14 September 2022

13 September 2022

4 September 2022

17 August 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)