Talk:Defecation: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
" |
"ball movement" redirects here, but there isn't any explanation as to why a "ball movement" is called that. i've always been confused by that, because it seems to me that it's the shit that moves through the balls, while the balls themselves pretty much stay put, perhaps wiggling a little at the most... |
||
i guess it's a movement going through the |
i guess it's a movement going through the balls. sort of like calling traffic driving through a tunnel a "tunnel movement." maybe just one of those non-sencical euphemisms... |
||
--[[User:Blackcats|Blackcats]] 07:27, 17 May 2005 (UTC) |
--[[User:Blackcats|Blackcats]] 07:27, 17 May 2005 (UTC) |
||
when the shit is inside you isn't it technically part of your |
when the shit is inside you isn't it technically part of your balls |
||
Revision as of 04:30, 25 June 2005
Does "shitting" belong in the heading of an encyclopaedia article on defecation? Jeff Anonymous 03:31, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I think it's a perfectly appropriate AKA --Blackcats 07:27, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- it's fun to talk shit when i'm bored late at night ;-Þ
"ball movement" redirects here, but there isn't any explanation as to why a "ball movement" is called that. i've always been confused by that, because it seems to me that it's the shit that moves through the balls, while the balls themselves pretty much stay put, perhaps wiggling a little at the most...
i guess it's a movement going through the balls. sort of like calling traffic driving through a tunnel a "tunnel movement." maybe just one of those non-sencical euphemisms...
--Blackcats 07:27, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
when the shit is inside you isn't it technically part of your balls