Jump to content

Talk:My Back Was a Bridge for You to Cross/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
quickfail
 
close My Back Was a Bridge for You to Cross good article nomination as unsuccessful (GANReviewTool)
Line 1: Line 1:
==GA Review==
==GA Review==
{{atopr
| status =
| result = Unsuccessful. [[User:Sammi Brie|<span style="color:#ba4168">Sammi Brie</span>]] (she/her • [[User talk:Sammi Brie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sammi Brie|c]]) 03:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:My Back Was a Bridge for You to Cross/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:My Back Was a Bridge for You to Cross/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:My Back Was a Bridge for You to Cross/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:My Back Was a Bridge for You to Cross/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
Line 12: Line 16:
* A Reception section should not be a string light of quotes. Right now, there is a quote in every sentence beyond the summary of this section! Keep a handful of quotes whose wording is particularly useful or noteworthy and paraphrase the rest.
* A Reception section should not be a string light of quotes. Right now, there is a quote in every sentence beyond the summary of this section! Keep a handful of quotes whose wording is particularly useful or noteworthy and paraphrase the rest.
* Review best practices for albums at [[MOS:ALBUM]].
* Review best practices for albums at [[MOS:ALBUM]].
{{abot}}

Revision as of 03:42, 16 July 2024

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 03:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a quickfail. At this time, I think the organization of background information is not where it should be for this type of article. The reception section also requires significant work to bring it to standard; it is overly quote-based.

Suggestions for the nominator:

  • Increase the detail on the background and development of the album. Add some context about past releases. Look at other album GAs to see how this is done.
  • A Reception section should not be a string light of quotes. Right now, there is a quote in every sentence beyond the summary of this section! Keep a handful of quotes whose wording is particularly useful or noteworthy and paraphrase the rest.
  • Review best practices for albums at MOS:ALBUM.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.