Jump to content

Template talk:Designation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Module talk:Designation)

Edit request 17 July 2025

[edit]

Propose adding National Cultural Heritage of Peru. Here is the official national inventory of Peru’s cultural assets (4 888 entries), maintained by the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Tourism, available in PDF and CSV.

Code to be added:

To Template:Designation/text (add below the last entry):

|NATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU          = [[Cultural Heritage of Peru]]

To Template:Designation/colour (add below the last entry):

|NATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU          = #FFE978

To Template:Designation/colour2 (add below the last entry):

|NATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU          = #CC3333

Once these are in place, please tag me and I will update Template:Designation/Supported designations accordingly. JustEMV (talk) 00:04, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JustEMV:  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:36, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 2 August 2025: Additional callnames for 'National Cultural Heritage of Peru' designation

[edit]

Thank you again to @Pppery: for implementing the original request!

As a follow-up, I realized I forgot to include additional callnames. Could the following aliases please be added to improve consistency and usability?

|NATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU|CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU|PCN|PERU = [[Cultural Heritage of Peru]]
|NATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU|CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU|PCN|PERU = #FFE978
|NATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU|CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU|PCN|PERU = #CC3333

Thanks in advance to any editor who can assist! JustEMV (talk) 15:05, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 16:14, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 18 August 2025

[edit]

Add this to Designation/text

|ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROTECTED MONUMENT OF SRI LANKA|APMSL = [[Archaeological Protected Monuments in Sri Lanka|Archaeological Protected Monument of Sri Lanka]]

Ttheek 09:04, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This has been done. GauchoDude (talk) 12:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 14 November 2025

[edit]

Description of suggested change: Propose adding Vietnam's Special National Site as a heritage designation template. Here's a list of sites that are eligible, published by the Vietnamese government.

Diff:

|SPECIAL NATIONAL SITE OF VIETNAM|VIETNAM SPECIAL NATIONAL SITE    = [[Special National Sites (Vietnam)|Special National Site of Vietnam]]
|SPECIAL NATIONAL SITE OF VIETNAM|VIETNAM SPECIAL NATIONAL SITE    = #FFE978
|SPECIAL NATIONAL SITE OF VIETNAM|VIETNAM SPECIAL NATIONAL SITE    = #FF0000

Yaaaaargh! (talk) 15:34, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question: How many of these sites actually have articles? You have linked to a list but not one on wikipedia... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:03, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently there does exist a list of them on Wikipedia, but only half of the entries actually have articles...
Even then though, there is still a significant amount of them that it should probably warrant its' own designation entry Yaaaaargh! (talk) 10:26, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please give an example of one article that uses, or could use, {{Infobox historic site}}, which which {{Designation}} is associated. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:23, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This article might be a suitable one Yaaaaargh! (talk) 03:55, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is no indication on that page that the site is designated in any way. All you had to do was provide one good example. I am marking this request as answered until there is a demonstrated need for this change. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:40, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 15 February 2026

[edit]

Propose adding Historical Site of Antigua and Barbuda. It has 334 historical sites covered (https://www.anbanet.com/antigua/antigua-historical-sites.html), has a list of entries, and has no overly broad locations. It relates to buildings and other small sites in the country and is somewhat similar in scope to the separate National Cultural Heritage of Antigua and Barbuda. It is maintained by the Museum of Antigua and Barbuda and used by the Antiguan government in historical preservation activities. Examples of sites on the list include Betty's Hope, Barbuda's government house, Fort Barrington, Fig Tree Drive, and St. John's Cathedral, and dozens of others.

Code to be removed:

"Historic Site of Antigua and Barbuda" callname from National Cultural Heritage of Antigua and Barbuda.

Code to be added:

|HISTORICAL SITE OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA|HISTORIC SITE OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA|HSAB = [[Historical Site of Antigua and Barbuda]]

|HISTORICAL SITE OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA|HISTORIC SITE OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA|HSAB = #0072C6

Code to be added for local significance:

|HISTORICAL SITE OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA|HISTORIC SITE OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA|HSAB = [[Historical Site of Antigua and Barbuda]]

|HISTORICAL SITE OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA|HISTORIC SITE OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA|HSAB = #0072C6

CROIXtalk 17:11, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Only 17 of these sites have articles on Wikipedia (see Category:Historical Site of Antigua and Barbuda). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:51, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There are more. I’ll get around to adding all sites on the register to the category soon. CROIXtalk 16:24, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 19:06, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Code update

[edit]

I'm planning to improve this template by putting all the data in one page (perhaps in JSON format like Module:Designation/list), and then another lookup table to recognise all the various aliases. This should make the template more efficient and make it easier to maintain. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:26, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lookup table now prepared here: Module:Designation/lookup — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:10, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@MSGJ, the update seems to be causing errors for pages that use Module:Designation through Template:Infobox NRHP. Pages like 860–880 Lake Shore Drive and 55 Wall Street are attempting to look up values on Template:Designation/abbreviation but are instead giving "No parameter" errors. Can this be fixed? – Epicgenius (talk) 18:39, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds more like an error on Template:Infobox NRHP because it is trying to call the designation without a parameter. I'll take a look — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:21, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully that has fixed it, but that NRHP template is terribly written! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:10, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@MSGJ, thanks for going out of your way to take a look. I really appreciate it - I couldn't figure out what exactly was causing the issue. I do agree the NRHP infobox's code is not that great though... – Epicgenius (talk) 21:24, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]