Six-port reflectometer
Six-port reflectometers are a type of electrical network analyzer that are displacing heterodyne network analyzers as the benchmark approach for microwave measurement of material and circuit properties.[1][2][3]
The complexity, sophistication, size, and cost of heterodyne systems limit them to laboratory environments, but manufacturers have developed compact systems for industrial applications.[2][4] Six-port reflectometers have gained popularity in academic and standardization research labs since their introduction by G. F. Engen in the 1960s, largely due to their simplicity.[5][6][7][8][9] Six-port reflectometers are limited by their complex calibration techniques, but increasing processing power is addressing the computational intensity of this task.
Operating principle
[edit]Regardless of the six-port receiver configuration—whether in detection or wireless communication—the fundamental principle remains the same. After processing two RF signals, the outputs are converted into baseband. The six-port structure includes two input ports and four output ports, totaling six. The signals are superimposed with four different relative phases.
When the input signal powers are similar, constructive or destructive interference occurs depending on the phase difference and resulting amplitudes. In-phase addition yields greater output amplitude; out-of-phase addition results in attenuation. A single phase combination leads to ambiguity. By applying four different phase offsets, additional equations are introduced to resolve it. In six-port architecture, a full-wave period is divided into four parts shifted by π/2: 0, π/2, π, and 3π/2. For microwave frequencies, these phase shifts are typically achieved using couplers.[6]
Advantages
[edit]The greatest advantage of the six-port reflectometer is its simple structure. Traditional network analyzers require high-quality components for frequency conversion and phase detection, whereas a six-port reflectometer consists of a passive linear circuit and a few power detectors. This makes it, in principle, much cheaper than traditional network analyzers.
Another important advantage in metrology labs: the measurement with a six-port reflectometer contains redundancy—three measured amplitudes determine the fourth up to a two-value ambiguity—allowing estimation of measurement accuracy.
A six-port reflectometer is also well-suited for measuring circuit behavior under high-power signals. Since it only needs to measure amplitude (or power), power measurement circuits are easier to design than the phase-sensitive circuits used in traditional analyzers.[10]
Disadvantages
[edit]Commercial success of six-port reflectometers has been limited; they are rarely used outside specialized labs, and if so, for very specific applications.
Several reasons explain this:
- Until recently, it was difficult to develop a six-port reflectometer with bandwidth comparable to traditional network analyzers.
- The calibration procedure is often longer than that of traditional analyzers.
- Like all non-frequency-selective homodyne systems, the six-port reflectometer faces challenges when measuring insertion loss, such as in band-stop filters. Unlike traditional heterodyne analyzers, signal harmonics are not eliminated, leading to reduced dynamic range.
For users only interested in measuring reflection coefficient amplitude (not phase), simpler and cheaper alternatives often suffice.[10]
References
[edit]- ^ Haddadi, Kamel (10 December 2016). "Mesure hyperfréquence des propriétés électromagnétiques de matériaux : 300 MHz à 300 GHz" [Microwave measurement of electromagnetic properties of materials: 300 MHz to 300 GHz]. Techniques de l'ingénieur (in French). Retrieved 26 February 2021.
- ^ a b Horibe, Masahiro (December 2015). Continuing challenge of improving measurement accuracy in terahertz vector network analyzers (INVITED): The taming of "terahertz vector network analyzers". 2015 86th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference. IEEE. doi:10.1109/arftg.2015.7381469. ISBN 978-1-4673-9247-1. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
- ^ Allal, Djamel; Litwin, Alexis; Vincent, Patricia; Ziade, François (July 2016). Vector network analyzer comparison up to 110 GHz in 1 mm coaxial line. 2016 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM). IEEE. doi:10.1109/cpem.2016.7540750. ISBN 978-1-4673-9134-4. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
- ^ Sanoh, M.; Suzuki, K. (June 2010). Practical linearity evaluation of vector network analyzer at RF. 2010 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM). IEEE. doi:10.1109/cpem.2010.5543506. ISBN 978-1-4244-6795-2. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
- ^ Engen, G.F. (December 1978). "Calibrating the Six-Port Reflectometer by Means of Sliding Terminations". IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 26 (12): 951–957. Bibcode:1978ITMTT..26..951E. doi:10.1109/TMTT.1978.1129527. ISSN 0018-9480. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
- ^ a b Koelpin, Alexander; Vinci, Gabor; Laemmle, Benjamin; Kissinger, Dietmar (December 2010). "The Six-Port in Modern Society". IEEE Microwave Magazine. 11 (7): 35–43. doi:10.1109/MMM.2010.938584. ISSN 1527-3342. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
- ^ Haddadi, K.; Wang, M.M.; Glay, D.; Lasri, T. (June 2009). "A New Range Finder Based on a Four-Port Junction". IEEE Sensors Journal. 9 (6): 697–698. Bibcode:2009ISenJ...9..697H. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2009.2021189. ISSN 1530-437X. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
- ^ Haddadi, K.; Wang, M.M.; Glay, D.; Lasri, T. (October 2009). "A 60 GHz Six-Port Distance Measurement System With Sub-Millimeter Accuracy". IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters. 19 (10): 644–646. doi:10.1109/LMWC.2009.2029744. ISSN 1531-1309. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
- ^ Haddadi, K.; Wang, M.M.; Loyez, C.; Glay, D. (January 2010). "Four-Port Communication Receiver With Digital IQ-Regeneration". IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters. 20 (1): 58–60. doi:10.1109/LMWC.2009.2035969. ISSN 1531-1309. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
- ^ a b Wiedmann, Frank. "The Six-Port Reflectometer". Retrieved 13 March 2021.