Jump to content

Draft:Robust Integral of the Sign of the Error (RISE) Control

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The Robust Integral of the Sign of the Error (RISE) controllers constitute a class of continuous robust control algorithms developed for nonlinear, control‐affine systems subject to uncertainties and disturbances. Distinguished by their capability to guarantee asymptotic tracking of reference trajectories even in the presence of bounded modeling errors, RISE controllers have emerged as an effective solution in contexts where exact system dynamics are unknown[1][2]. Recent theoretical advancements have further extended these results to prove exponential stability under appropriate conditions[3][4][5].

Introduction

[edit]

RISE controllers are designed for nonlinear systems that can be expressed in the control‐affine form[3]

where represents the system state, encapsulates modeling uncertainties and external disturbances, and is the control input. The methodology employs a continuous control signal that incorporates an integral of the sign of the tracking error, thereby avoiding the chattering typically associated with conventional sliding mode controllers. The control design is underpinned by a Lyapunov stability analysis that utilizes an auxiliary function, often referred to as the P-function, to establish both asymptotic and exponential stability.

Theoretical Framework

[edit]

Control Law Formulation

[edit]

For a control‐affine nonlinear system, the RISE control law is formulated as[3] where is the time derivative of the desired trajectory, represents the tracking error, and is a constant control gain. In order to compensate for uncertainties, an auxiliary term is dynamically updated according to in which is a filtered version of the tracking error, and as well as are positive control gains. The signum function, , is incorporated to ensure robust compensation against disturbances, thereby driving the tracking error toward zero.

Lyapunov Stability and the P-Function

[edit]

A central element of the RISE controller design is the construction of a Lyapunov function that verifies the stability of the closed-loop system. The P-function, an auxiliary construct employed in the stability analysis, is used to demonstrate that the derivative of the Lyapunov function is negative definite. Early analyses based on the P-function established asymptotic stability, while more recent studies[3][4][5] have refined its design to show that, under suitable gain selection, the closed-loop system achieves exponential stability.

Applications and Extensions

[edit]

RISE controllers have been applied across a broad spectrum of engineering domains. In robotics, for example, they have been deployed for the precise control of manipulators[6], autonomous underwater vehicles[7], and mobile robots[8], where the ability to handle significant uncertainties is critical. The versatility of the RISE methodology has also led to its adoption in state estimation, distributed optimization, aerospace control for unmanned aerial vehicles, and precision control in hydraulic systems. Over time, several extensions to the standard RISE framework have been developed, including adaptive strategies that incorporate classical adaptive control techniques to manage structured uncertainties, neural network-based implementations for enhanced nonlinear function approximation, and modifications designed to address issues such as input saturation[5] and time delays[4].

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Qu, Z.; Xu, J. X. (2002). "Model-based learning controls and their comparisons using Lyapunov direct method". Asian Journal of Control. 4 (1): 99–110.
  2. ^ Xian, B.; Dawson, D.M.; de Queiroz, M.S.; Chen, J. (2004). "A continuous asymptotic tracking control strategy for uncertain nonlinear systems". IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 49 (7): 1206–1211. doi:10.1109/TAC.2004.831148. ISSN 1558-2523.
  3. ^ a b c d Patil, Omkar Sudhir; Isaly, Axton; Xian, Bin; Dixon, Warren E. (2022). "Exponential Stability With RISE Controllers". IEEE Control Systems Letters. 6: 1592–1597. doi:10.1109/LCSYS.2021.3127134. ISSN 2475-1456.
  4. ^ a b c Patil, Omkar Sudhir; Stubbs, Kimberly J.; Amy, Patrick M.; Dixon, Warren E. (2022). "Exponential Stability with RISE Controllers for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Time-Varying State Delays". 2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC): 6431–6435. doi:10.1109/CDC51059.2022.9993171.
  5. ^ a b c Patil, Omkar Sudhir; Kamalapurkar, Rushikesh; Dixon, Warren E. (2025). "Saturated RISE Controllers With Exponential Stability Guarantees: A Projected Dynamical Systems Approach". IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control: 1–8. doi:10.1109/TAC.2025.3543246. ISSN 1558-2523.
  6. ^ Fischer, Nicholas; Kan, Zhen; Kamalapurkar, Rushikesh; Dixon, Warren E. (2014). "Saturated RISE Feedback Control for a Class of Second-Order Nonlinear Systems". IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 59 (4): 1094–1099. doi:10.1109/TAC.2013.2286913. ISSN 1558-2523.
  7. ^ Fischer, Nicholas; Hughes, Devin; Walters, Patrick; Schwartz, Eric M.; Dixon, Warren E. (2014). "Nonlinear RISE-Based Control of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle". IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 30 (4): 845–852. doi:10.1109/TRO.2014.2305791. ISSN 1941-0468.
  8. ^ Dierks, Travis; Jagannathan, S. (2009). "Neural Network Control of Mobile Robot Formations Using RISE Feedback". IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics). 39 (2): 332–347. doi:10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2005122. ISSN 1941-0492.

Category:Control theory Category:Control engineering Category:Nonlinear control Category:Robust control