Zum Inhalt springen

Benutzer:Jens Lallensack/Werkstatt

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Dies ist eine alte Version dieser Seite, zuletzt bearbeitet am 3. Juli 2008 um 14:29 Uhr durch Jens Lallensack (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Angepasste Kopie des Artikels Alioramus aus der englischen Wikipedia, Beginn der Übersetzung). Sie kann sich erheblich von der aktuellen Version unterscheiden.
Alioramus

Lebendsbild von Alioramus remotus

Zeitliches Auftreten
Obere Kreide (Maastrichtium)
70 bis 65 Mio. Jahre
Fundorte
Systematik
Echsenbeckendinosaurier (Saurischia)
Theropoda
Tyrannosauroidea
Tyrannosauridae
Tyrannosaurinae
Alioramus
Wissenschaftlicher Name
Alioramus
Kurzanov, 1976
Art
  • Alioramus remotus

Alioramus (meaning 'different branch') is a genus of tyrannosaurid theropod dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous Period of Asia. The type and only species, A. remotus, is known from a partial skull and three metatarsals recovered from Mongolian sediments which were deposited in a humid floodplain between 70 to 65 million years ago. These remains were named and described by Russian paleontologist Sergei Kurzanov in 1976. Its relationships to other tyrannosaurid genera are unknown, but some experts believe Alioramus is closely related to the contemporaneous Tarbosaurus, or is a juvenile of that genus.

While very little skeletal material is known, Alioramus was probably bipedal like most theropods, and its sharp teeth indicate that it was a carnivore. It was smaller than tyrannosaurids like Tarbosaurus and Tyrannosaurus, but its adult size is difficult to estimate since it is known mainly from a skull, which may belong to a juvenile. Alioramus is characterized by the row of five bony crests along the top of its snout, and also has more teeth than any other tyrannosaurid. Its skull is lower than those of other tyrannosaurids, but this might be a juvenile feature.

Description

Alioramus was estimated at between 5 and 6 meters (16.5 to 20 ft) in length when originally described by Sergei Kurzanov in 1976.[1] Kurzanov, however, did not correct for lengthening of the skull by deformation during fossilization, which may indicate a shorter overall body length for this individual. If this specimen is a juvenile, then adult Alioramus would have reached greater lengths, but no confirmed adult specimens are known.[2]

The skull of Alioramus.

The skull was approximately 45 centimeters (18 in) long.[3] In general, it is long and low, a shape typical of more basal tyrannosauroids and juveniles of larger tyrannosaurids. The premaxillary bones at the tip of the snout in Alioramus have not been found, but are taller than wide in all tyrannosauroids for which they are known. [2] The nasal bones are fused and ornamented with a row of five irregular bony crests that protrude upwards from the midline, where the nasal bones are sutured together. These crests all measure more than 1 centimeter (0.4 in) tall.[1] At the back of the skull there is a transversely-oriented protrusion, called the nuchal crest, arising from the fused parietal bones, a feature shared with all tyrannosaurids. In Alioramus, the nuchal crest is greatly thickened, similarly to Tarbosaurus and Tyrannosaurus. Like the rest of the skull, the lower jaw of Alioramus was long and slender, another possible juvenile characteristic.[2] As in Tarbosaurus, a ridge on the outer surface of the angular bone of the lower jaw articulated with the rear of the dentary bone, locking the two bones together and removing much of the flexibility seen in other tyrannosaurids.[4] Other tyrannosaurids had four premaxillary teeth, D-shaped in cross section, on each side. Including 16 or 17 in each maxilla, and 18 in each dentary, Alioramus had 76 or 78 teeth, more than any other tyrannosaurid.[5]

Alioramus with a human for scale.

The postcranial skeleton of Alioramus is completely unknown except for three metatarsals, but tyrannosaurids had essentially conservative morphology. Alioramus moved about on two legs, which most likely had proportions similar to those of ornithomimosaurs, with long tibiae and metatarsals in comparison to the femora. Like other tyrannosaurids, the forelimbs were likely very small and probably bore only two digits, although some tyrannosaurid specimens retained a vestigial third digit. A long tail would have balanced out the head and torso, putting the center of mass over the hips.[2]

Classification and systematics

Paleontologists classify Alioramus within the superfamily Tyrannosauroidea, but because its remains are poorly known, a more precise classification remains elusive.[2] A cladistic analysis published in 2003 found Alioramus could be further classified into the family Tyrannosauridae and the subfamily Tyrannosaurinae, alongside Tyrannosaurus, Tarbosaurus and Daspletosaurus.[6] A 2004 study supported this result but suggested it was equally probable that Alioramus belonged outside the family Tyrannosauridae entirely, with its supposed juvenile characters actually reflecting a more basal position within Tyrannosauroidea.[2] Another study omitted Alioramus altogether due to the only specimen's fragmentary nature.[7]

Tarbosaurus and Alioramus shared several skull features, including a locking mechanism in the lower jaw between the dentary and angular bones, and both lacked the prong of the nasal bones which connected to the lacrimal bones in all other tyrannosaurids except adult Daspletosaurus. The two genera may be closely related, representing an Asian branch of the Tyrannosauridae.[4][6] Some specimens of Tarbosaurus have a row of bumps on the nasal like those of Alioramus, although much lower. The long and low shape of the known Alioramus skull indicates that it was immature when it died and might even be a juvenile Tarbosaurus, which lived in the same time and place. The more prominent nasal crests and much higher tooth count of Alioramus, however, suggest it is a separate taxon, even if it is juvenile.[5] Specimens identified as immature Tarbosaurus have the same tooth count as adults.[8][9]

Tyrannosauridae
  ├─Albertosaurinae
  |    ├──Albertosaurus
  |    └──Gorgosaurus
  └─Tyrannosaurinae
       └──Daspletosaurus
            ├──Tarbosaurus
            └──Tyrannosaurus

Kladogramm der Tyrannosauridae nach Carr et al., 2003[7]
Tyrannosauridae
  ├─Albertosaurinae
  |    ├──Albertosaurus
  |    └──Gorgosaurus
  └─Tyrannosaurinae
       ├──Daspletosaurus
       |     ├──Tarbosaurus
       |     └──Alioramus
       └──├──Nanotyrannus
          └──Tyrannosaurus

Alternatives Kladogramm der Tyrannosauridae nach Currie et al., 2003[6]

Discovery and naming

Bayankhongor, the Mongolian aimag (province) where Alioramus remains were discovered.

The holotype (PIN 3141/1) of Alioramus is a partial skull associated with three metatarsals. A joint Soviet-Mongolian expedition to the Gobi Desert in the early 1970s found these remains at a locality known as Nogon-Tsav in the Mongolian province of Bayankhongor. Alioramus was named and described by Russian paleontologist Sergei Kurzanov in 1976. Its crests and low skull profile looked so different from other tyrannosaurids that Kurzanov believed his find was far removed from other members of the family. Accordingly, he gave it the generic name Alioramus, derived from the Latin alius ('other') and ramus ('branch'), and the specific name A. remotus, which means 'removed' in Latin.[1] No other remains besides the holotype are known.[2]

Paleoecology

The Beds of Nogon-Tsav are considered to be contemporaneous with the Nemegt Formation.[1] This geologic formation has never been dated radiometrically, but the fauna present in the fossil record indicate it was probably deposited during the Maastrichtian stage, at the very end of the Late Cretaceous.[10] The Maastrichtian lasted from 70 to 65 million years ago.[11]

The Maastrichtian stage in Mongolia, as preserved in the Nemegt Formation and at Nogon-Tsav, was characterized by a wetter and more humid climate compared with the semi-arid environment preserved in the earlier, underlying Barun Goyot and Djadochta Formations. Nemegt sediments preserve floodplains, large river channels and soil deposits, but caliche deposits indicate periodic droughts.[12] This environment supported a more diverse and generally larger dinosaur fauna than in earlier times. Kurzanov reported that other theropods, including Tarbosaurus, ornithomimosaurs and therizinosaurs were discovered at the same locality,[1] but these remains have never been reported in detail. If the Nogon Tsav fauna was similar to that of the Nemegt Formation, troodontid theropods, as well as pachycephalosaurs, ankylosaurids and hadrosaurs would also have been present.[10] Titanosaurian sauropods were also potential prey for predators in the Nemegt.[4]

Einzelnachweise

  1. a b c d e Sergei M. Kurzanov: A new carnosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Nogon-Tsav, Mongolia. In: The Joint Soviet-Mongolian Paleontological Expedition Transactions. 3. Jahrgang, S. 93–104 (russisch).
  2. a b c d e f g Thomas R. Holtz: The Dinosauria. Hrsg.: Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter; & Osmólska, Halszka (eds.). Second Edition Auflage. University of California Press, Berkeley 2004, ISBN 0-520-24209-2, Tyrannosauroidea, S. 111–136.
  3. Philip J. Currie: The Age of Dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000, ISBN 978-0-521-54582-2, Theropods from the Cretaceous of Mongolia, S. 434–455.
  4. a b c Jørn H. Hurum, & Sabath, Karol.: Giant theropod dinosaurs from Asia and North America: Skulls of Tarbosaurus bataar and Tyrannosaurus rex compared. In: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 48. Jahrgang, Nr. 2, 2003, S. 161–190 (pan.pl [PDF]).
  5. a b Philip J. Currie: Cranial anatomy of tyrannosaurids from the Late Cretaceous of Alberta. In: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 48. Jahrgang, Nr. 2, 2003, S. 191–226 (pan.pl [PDF]).
  6. a b c Philip J. Currie, Hurum, Jørn H; & Sabath, Karol.: Skull structure and evolution in tyrannosaurid phylogeny. In: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 48. Jahrgang, Nr. 2, 2003, S. 227–234 (pan.pl [PDF]).
  7. a b Thomas D. Carr, Williamson, Thomas E.; & Schwimmer, David R.: A new genus and species of tyrannosauroid from the Late Cretaceous (middle Campanian) Demopolis Formation of Alabama. In: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 25. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, 2005, S. 119–143, doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0119:ANGASO]2.0.CO;2 (bioone.org).
  8. Evgeny A. Maleev: New carnivorous dinosaurs from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia. In: Doklady, Academy of Sciences USSR. 104. Jahrgang, Nr. 5, 1955, S. 779–783 (russisch).
  9. Philip J. Currie: Allometric growth in tyrannosaurids (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of North America and Asia. In: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 40. Jahrgang, Nr. 4, 2003, S. 651–665, doi:10.1139/e02-083.
  10. a b Tomasz Jerzykiewicz, & Russell, Dale A.: Late Mesozoic stratigraphy and vertebrates of the Gobi Basin. In: Cretaceous Research. 12. Jahrgang, Nr. 4, 1991, S. 345–377, doi:10.1016/0195-6671(91)90015-5.
  11. Felix M. Gradstein, Ogg, James G.; & Smith, Alan G.: A Geologic Time Scale 2004. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005, ISBN 978-0-521-78142-8, S. 500pp.
  12. Halszka Osmólska: The Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs. Hrsg.: Currie, Philip J.; & Kevin Padian (eds.). Academic Press, San Diego 1997, ISBN 0-12-226810-5, Nemegt Formation.


Dieser Artikel ist eine abgeänderte Übersetzung des Artikels [1] aus der englischen Wikipedia mit dem Stand vom 03. Juli 2008. Eine Liste der Autoren ist unter Autoren einzusehen.

de:Alioramus