Diskussion:BMW N53
Erscheinungsbild
Letzter Kommentar: vor 17 Jahren von 80.38.37.26 in Abschnitt Table corrected
Data table
Data table is completly wrong! Check the english entry.--80.38.37.26 13:57, 14. Mai 2008 (CEST)
- It is correct. The english version depends on the lower octane rating you have over there. Whilst you have about 85 octane, we have up to 100, which evokes more power --Affemitwaffe 16:36, 14. Mai 2008 (CEST)
- I'm spanish! First, remember that english is for the UK also and, second, don't confuse hp with PS (see horsepower). Again: check the english version... as an example: there is no 2.5 litre N53B30! It's a 3 litre displacement engine. The 160 kW N53 engine is coded as N53B30U0 (x25i E90/E91/E92/E93/E60/E61) and it's a 3 litre displacement. If you don't believe me, check this [1]; here you will find the three N53 engines. Sorry: I don't know german. Otherwise I would change it myself! --80.38.37.26 00:11, 20. Mai 2008 (CEST)
Angular velocity
By the way, as europeans: Don't you prefer rad/s instead of U/min? --80.38.37.26 00:34, 20. Mai 2008
- As a German never heard of rad/s ;-) We usally use U/min --Affemitwaffe 14:00, 20. Mai 2008 (CEST)
- That's impossible: radian per second is the SI unit for angular velocity! Good unit because you can multiply Nm by rad/s to directly get W. Anyway, the engine table is still wrong.--80.38.37.26 16:24, 20. Mai 2008 (CEST)
Table corrected
The table is now correct. --80.38.37.26 11:38, 21. Mai 2008 (CEST)