Zum Inhalt springen

Benutzer:Mikxth/Swifties

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Dies ist eine alte Version dieser Seite, zuletzt bearbeitet am 26. September 2023 um 12:30 Uhr durch en>Ronherry. Sie kann sich erheblich von der aktuellen Version unterscheiden.

Vorlage:Short description

Swifties are the fandom of American singer-songwriter Taylor Swift. Regarded as one of the largest and most devoted fanbases of the 21st century by journalists, Swifties are known for their high levels of participation, creativity and fan frenzy. They are a subject of widespread coverage in mainstream media and are often credited as one of the factors driving Swift's success and popularity.

Critics and academics have noted the intimacy and uniqueness of the artist-fandom relationship; Swift has frequently engaged with, personally helped, and prioritised the fans, while the latter have offered unprecedented support and interest in Swift's works and persisting through her moments of negative press. Having influenced the music industry and beyond in many aspects, Swifties helped Swift with the success of her re-recordings after her masters dispute, contributed to the political scrutiny of Ticketmaster, and caused economic growth with the cultural impact of the Eras Tour. However, the fanbase has been criticized for verbally attacking internet users and celebrities who had maligned Swift.

Swift's releases, promotional efforts and fashion choices have garnered attention and acclaim for incorporating Easter eggs and clues that are decoded by Swifties, dubbed part of Swift's musical universe. Cultural analyses have variably described Swifties as a community of interest, a subculture, and nearly a metaverse.

History

Origins

Taylor Swift debuted as a 16-year-old country music singer-songwriter in 2006. As per media reports, Swift has had a fanbase as early as 2005. Before releasing her debut single "Tim McGraw" (2006), Swift had been using social networking websites. She was one of the first country artists to use the Internet as a marketing tool for her music. Swift predominantly used MySpace to promote herself and connect with listeners who had liked her music when it played on the radio.[1][2][3] She created her MySpace account on August 31, 2005, a day before her then-label, Big Machine Records, was inaugurated. Swift's songs on MySpace collected more than 45 million listens, which Scott Borchetta, the label CEO, provided to "skeptical" country radio programmers to convince them of existing fans for Swift's songs.[4] Swift's early fanbase, initially, consisted of white American teenage girls.Vorlage:Cn

Swift released her debut studio album, Taylor Swift, in the United Sates in October 2006, It sold 40,000 copies in its first week.[5] However, the album became a sleeper hit as it kept selling consistently over time,[6] reaching a million copies in November 2007.[7] It garnered its highest sales week in January 2008 with 187,000 copies.[8] This sleeper success contributed to a rapid increase in Swift's notability within and beyond the country music scene. Taylor Swift spent 24 weeks at the number-one spot of the U.S. Top Country Albums chart and became the longest-running album from the 2000s decade on the all-genre Billboard 200.[9][10] Her follow-up record, Fearless, was released in November 2008 and became the best-selling album of 2009. It achieved significant international success beyond the Anglosphere,[11][12] where country music was then not popular,[13][12] and the singles "Love Story" and "You Belong with Me" became crossover successes on pop radio,[14] catapulting Swift to mainstream fame and widening her audience.[15][16] The success planted dedicated fanbases for Swift in overseas markets such as the United Kingdom,[11] Ireland, Brazil and Taiwan.[12]

Etymology

The term "Swiftie" for a Swift fan gained popularity in the late 2000s.Vorlage:Cn Swift stated in a 2012 Vevo interview that her fans call themselves "Swifties", which she found "adorable".[17] Swift filed the word Swifties for trademark in March 2017.[18]

Relationship

Swift maintains a close relationship with Swifties, to whom many journalists attribute cultural influence.[19][20] Her connection with fans is considered unique for artists of her stature; she has interacted with them on social media, sent them gifts, hand-selected them to attend intimate concerts or meet-and-greets, made surprise visits, participated in some of their functions, and gifted free tickets to disadvantaged fans.[20][21][22] She hosted the "Secret Sessions", a series of pre-release album-listening parties for fans at her houses.[23][24]

With her large fanbase, Swift is one of the most followed people on social media.[25][26][27] According to ticketing executive Nathan Hubbard, Swift was the first musician ever "to be natively online."[28] Rolling Stone critic Brittany Spanos opined that Swift grew her fanbase on social media: "She was using Tumblr way past its prime. Twitter. She's now on TikTok, commenting on people's videos."[3]

She has donated to fans to cover their academic loans, medical bills, rent or other expenses, and once bought a house for a pregnant, homeless fan.[29][30] Her excess donation to a fan with leukemia on GoFundMe in 2015 caused the crowdfunding platform to expand its policy.[31] Swift has written songs in honor of her fans, such as "Long Live" (2010)[32] or "Ronan" (2012); the latter is a charity record about a fan's four-year-old son who died of neuroblastoma.[21]

Lore and community

Vorlage:Quote box

Journalists describe her works, celebrity, and the fanfare surrounding them a world on its own, dubbing it a music "universe" subject to analyses by Swifties. Propagated by her prolific use of Easter eggs and "unusually close connection with her fans",[33][34] Swift is a source of myth in popular culture. Her outfits, accessories, diction, color coding, and numerology have also been Easter eggs.[35][36] Glamour and The Washington Post termed it the Taylor Swift Cinematic Universe.[37][38] Entertainment Weekly called it Taylor Swift Musical Universe—"a pop star known for prodigious hint-dropping, whose fans turn every piece of info into an online archaeological dig."[39] In The Guardian, Adrian Horton said "Swiftverse" is a subculture of mass media, cultivated by "years of worldbuilding and Swiftian mythology",[40] while Alim Kheraj wrote Swift turned pop music into a "multiplayer puzzle" involving fanbase commitment, which other artists have attempted to reproduce.[41]

Andrew Unterberger of Spin wrote that symbolisms are "inextricable elements of the Taylor Swift experience" and key to understanding her work.[42] To Caroline Mimbs Nyce of The Atlantic, Swift's fandom is nearly a metaverse: "a huge virtual community unmoored from a single platform, based on a world around Taylor Swift, missing only the 3D virtual space to hang out in."[43] According to Yahr, Swift enjoys embedding "clues, hints and puzzles" in her works, social media posts and interviews, constructing a self-mythology that fans believe could have a hidden meaning and attempt to decode, such as a release date, song or album title or an artistic element.[44] Madeline Merinuk of Today observed how Swift's easter eggs, which originated as short messages hidden within elaborate CD packaging, have become more innovative and intricate over time.[45] The critical analysis is referred to as "Swiftology" in the media.[46][42] For instance, "the scarf" mentioned in "All Too Well" has been a topic of mythology.[47][48][49]

Swift is known for her album rollouts and promotional concepts, often referred to as "eras".[50][51][52] Each of era is characterized by an aesthetic idea, color palette, mood, and a fashion style.[53][54][55] As such, Swift has reinvented her image and style throughout her career, which Ashley Lutz of Fortune felt aided in broadening her fanbase.[56]

Sociological characteristics

Swifties have been described as a loyal fanbase with high levels of participation and creativity.[57] To The Washington Post, Swift and Swifties are "all part of one big friend group".[33] Many fans feel connected to her as they "have grown up with her and her music."[58][59] Their positive reception of Reputation, which was released after the 2016 controversy, demonstrated their commitment to her, irrespective of a tonal shift in her artistry and public perception.Vorlage:Sfn Billboard wrote the unprecedented success of Swift's re-recorded albums was further evidence of their loyalty.[60] According to Willman, the re-records' success inspired other artists to "weaponize fans in their business disputes".[61] Author Amanda Petrusich described Swifties' allegiance as both "mighty and frightening".[62]

The consumerist phenomenon of purchasing anything related to Swift has been termed "the Taylor Swift effect" by The Guardian.[63] To business scientists Brendan Canavan and Claire McCamley, the relationship between Swift and Swifties represents post-postmodern consumerism.Vorlage:Sfn Sociologist Brian Donovan opined, "it is easy to dismiss the frenzy surrounding Swift as mindless hero worship. Yet, the Swifties have shown the power of fandom to create social bonds that transcend consumerism."[64] He praised Swift's ability to "tap into the collector mindset in her fandom".[65] The frenzy, generally termed "Swiftmania",[66] has been considered the 21st-century equivalent to Beatlemania by journalists such as Jon Bream of Star Tribune, who said "Swift has achieved a once unthinkable monoculture, a zeitgeistian redux of Beatlemania".[67][68]

Impact

Vorlage:See also Swifties have been widely covered for their support to Swift in terms of her commercial success. Swift is known for her large CD and vinyl sales despite the 21st-century music scene having shifted to a largely digital industry.[69] In 2014–2015, Swift contested music streaming services Spotify and Apple Music to regulate their policies to protect the artists' integrity.[70][71] She announced that 1989, her first-ever pop music album, would not release on Spotify, protesting the platform's "minuscule" payments to musicians.[72] Some journalists, such as Nilay Patel of Vox, criticized Swift's beliefs; Patel said that the Internet has sabotaged the album format, claiming most fans would not shop for a Swift CD anymore.[73] Many industry personnel felt that Swift departing from country music and streaming platforms would impact the album's sales.[74] Publications predicted 1989 to not sell over a million copies in the first week like her previous albums Speak Now (2010) and Red (2012) did.[75][76] However, 1989 was a unprecedented success for Swift despite the lack of streaming support, widely purchased by fans as CDs from Target.[77] The album marked Swift's first album to sell 1.28 million copies in the opening week.[77] In the 2020s, Swifties have also been credited with being one of the factors driving a vinyl revival.[78] Swift's album LP variants have been sold exclusively at small business shops, driving their profits.[79][80]

The fans increased the publicity surrounding Swift's 2019 masters dispute with Big Machine and American businessman Scooter Braun and drove the success of her re-recording efforts.[81][82][83] An online petition launched by a fan on Change.org, calling Braun and Borchetta "to stop holding Swift's art hostage", garnered 35,000 plaintiffs in its first three hours. Michael Jones, managing director of campaigns in Change.org, described the petition as "one the fastest-growing petitions on the platform this month".[84] Braun, however, claimed that Swift "weaponized" her fanbase by making the dispute public.[85] Swifties also discovered that the Carlyle Group, a partner of Braun in the dispute, supplies weapons to the civil war in Yemen, which was confirmed to by publications such as The New York Times.[86][87][88]

Swift's works, including concert tour like the Eras Tour, are known to drive surrounding economies.[89] Swifties have caused this economic impact, attributed to the "booming" travel, lodging, cosmetic, fashion, and food businesses,[90] which boost tourism revenues of cities by a large margin.[91][92][93] The Los Angeles Times described Swifties as an economic microcosm consisting of skyrocketing demand, limited supply, and price gouging, and customers "willing to pay almost anything."[94] In November 2022, the U.S. pre-sale of the Eras Tour was mishandled by Ticketmaster, receiving widespread public and political scrutiny. Due to the "astronomical" fan demand,[95] the Ticketmaster website crashed within an hour of sale but still sold 2.4 million tickets, breaking the record for the most concert tickets sold by an artist in a single day. Ticketmaster attributed the crash to "historically unprecedented" site traffic.[96][97] Fans and consumer groups accused Ticketmaster of deceit and monopoly.[98] The intense fan reactions caused several members of the U.S. Congress to highlight the merger of Ticketmaster and its parent company Live Nation Entertainment that has led to substandard service and higher ticket prices.[99] The U.S. Department of Justice opened investigations into Live Nation–Ticketmaster,[100] whereas several fans sued the companies for intentional deception, fraud, price fixing, and antitrust law violations.[101] Under pressure from president Joe Biden, Ticketmaster and other ticketing companies agreed to terminate junk fees.[102] Entertainment Weekly and The A.V. Club listed "Swifties vs. Ticketmaster" as one of the biggest cultural news stories of 2022.[103][104] CNN journalist Allison Morrow wrote in an article titled "One Nation, Under Swift" that Swift's fans united the parties against Ticketmaster in a way "the Founding Fathers failed to anticipate".[105]

Noticing the growing trend of Swift-themed dance parties in the world, industry commentators found that Swift's cultural position as a staple in the 21st-century music landscape allowed nightclubs to profit from her by hosting specialized events for fans.[106][107][108] One such party is "Swiftogeddon", which began as an one-off Swiftie event in London and grew into a U.K.-wide club-night tour that sells out every weekend.[109]

Demographics

According to a 2023 survey by Morning Consult, in the U.S., 53% of adults said they were fans of Swift, of whom 44% identified as Swifties and 16% as her "avid" fans. Of the fans, 52% were women, while 48% were men; racially, the 74% of the fans were white, 13% were Black, 9% were Asian, and 4% from other races; politically, 55% of the fans were Democratic, 23% Republican, and 23% independent. In terms of generations: 45% millennials, 23% baby boomers, 21% Generation X, and 11% Generation Z.[110] Brooke Schultz of the Associated Press called Swift's fans an influential voter demographic in U.S. politics.[111]

Criticism

Swifties have received criticism for certain behaviors as well. Journalists have denounced the parasocial interactions that some Swifties have with Swift, including excessive interest in Swift's private life.[112][113] Fans have swarmed locations where she is spotted.[114] They have also been reported to attack, harass or send death threats online to, and dox other celebrities, journalists, and Internet users for various reasons, such as speaking negatively of Swift.[115][116][117] Following the masters dispute, American businessman Scooter Braun claimed that he received death threats,[118] saying, "I am certain there is no situation ever worth jeopardising anyone's safety."[119]

A small faction of Swifties, called "Gaylors", believe that Swift is secretly gay and hints at her queerness through her music, although she described herself as an ally to the LGBT community. Some Gaylors specifically ship Swift with Karlie Kloss, Dianna Agron, or both, claiming Swift dated them in the past, and accuse Swift of queerbaiting if she is not actually gay. Most Swifties criticize Gaylor theories as far-fetched, malicious, and disrespectful to Swift. Journalists likewise dismiss it as an invasive and baseless conspiracy theory.[120][121]

Academic analysis

Swifties have been the subject of journalistic and academic interest for their "prolific content creation, digital savvy, organizing capacity, and sometimes vicious online behaviors", as per internet culture researchers Cristina López and Avneesh Chandra.[121] Donovan distinguished "Taylor Swift fans" from Swifties, opining that the latter are a subculture characterized by collective effervescence, unlike other fanbases. Some linguists termed the Swifties' fan-coded, lyrics-based language a "fanilect".[122] A 2023 network map published by Internet researchers Cristina López and Avneesh Chandra divided Swifties into six distinct factions based on online activities.[121]

See also

References

Vorlage:Reflist

  1. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  2. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  3. a b Taylor Swift is peak millennial vibes. NPR, 21. Oktober 2022, abgerufen am 19. Dezember 2022.
  4. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  5. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  6. Jim Malec: Taylor Swift: The Garden In The Machine (Memento des Originals vom August 7, 2013 im Internet Archive) In: American Songwriter, May 2, 2011, S. 3. Abgerufen im May 21, 2012 
  7. Joey Guerra: Swift known for sweet sound, but there's more to her. In: Houston Chronicle. 3. November 2007, abgerufen am 21. Februar 2020.
  8. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  9. Sterling Whitaker: 15 Years Ago Today: Taylor Swift Releases Debut Album. In: Taste of Country. 24. Oktober 2021, abgerufen am 24. Oktober 2021 (englisch).
  10. Jim Malec: Taylor Swift: The Garden In The Machine (Memento des Originals vom August 7, 2013 im Internet Archive) In: American Songwriter, May 2, 2011, S. 3. Abgerufen im May 21, 2012 
  11. a b Charlotte Cripps: Country music star Taylor Swift the new country music is all about In: The Independent, June 21, 2013. Abgerufen im June 9, 2023 
  12. a b c Vorlage:Cite magazine
  13. Colin Crummy: Detwanging country music: how Nashville took the UK In: The Guardian, March 13, 2014. Abgerufen im September 23, 2021 
  14. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  15. Allison Stewart: Taylor Swift's New Take on Fearless Piles on the Nostalgia, Along with Some Revenge In: The Washington Post, April 12, 2021. Abgerufen im August 20, 2021 
  16. Lauren M. Jackson: 10 Years Later, Taylor Swift's Fearless Still Slaps. 12. November 2018, abgerufen am 27. März 2023.
  17. Taylor Swift - #VEVOCertified, Pt. 3: Taylor Talks About Her Fans (ab Fehler im Ausdruck: Unerkanntes Wort „m“:Fehler im Ausdruck: Unerwarteter Operator <Fehler im Ausdruck: Unerkanntes Wort „m“:Fehler im Ausdruck: Unerwarteter Operator <Fehler im Ausdruck: Unerkanntes Wort „m“) auf YouTubeFehler bei Vorlage * Parameter ungültig (Vorlage:YouTube): "time"
  18. Dan Rys: Taylor Swift Files Nine Trademarks For the Word 'Swifties,' But Why? In: Billboard. 15. März 2017, abgerufen am 26. September 2023 (amerikanisches Englisch).
  19. Fawzia Khan: The Might Of Taylor Swift. 18. Juni 2021, archiviert vom Original am 28. Juni 2021; abgerufen am 20. Oktober 2021.
  20. a b Katie Collins: How Taylor Swift flipped online fandom on its head for the better. 8. Juni 2018, abgerufen am 19. März 2023.
  21. a b Jordyn Tilchen: Taylor Swift's Fans Have Known Her For 13 Years — This Is How She's Kept Growing With Them, August 21, 2019. Abgerufen im May 14, 2023 
  22. Taylor Swift defends fan, gets them tickets after incident at Philadelphia show, May 16, 2023. Abgerufen im May 17, 2023 
  23. Katie Kawa, Cherese Cartlidge: Taylor Swift: Superstar Singer. Greenhaven Publishing LLC, 2016, ISBN 978-1-5345-6026-0 (google.com).
  24. Emily Yahr: Taylor Swift Avoided and Mocked the Media with 'Reputation.' And It Worked. In: The Washington Post, November 15, 2017. Abgerufen im December 25, 2020 
  25. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  26. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  27. Brandwatch's 50 Most Influential People on Twitter 2021. In: Brandwatch. Abgerufen am 4. November 2021.
  28. Sisario Ben: How Taylor Swift's Eras Tour Conquered the World In: The New York Times, August 5, 2023 
  29. Ilana Kaplan: Taylor Swift buys homeless pregnant woman a house In: The Independent, January 3, 2018. Abgerufen im May 14, 2023 
  30. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  31. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  32. Sam Sodomsky: Taylor Swift: Speak Now. In: Pitchfork. 19. August 2019, abgerufen am 19. August 2019.
  33. a b Emily Yahr: The bonding experience of watching a Taylor Swift concert from a parking lot In: The Washington Post, May 15, 2023. Abgerufen im May 17, 2023 
  34. Sarah Gambles: The ubiquitous power of Taylor Swift In: Deseret News, July 23, 2023 
  35. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  36. Adrian Horton: How Taylor Swift's Eras tour took over America In: The Guardian, May 29, 2023 
  37. Emily Yahr: 2022: The year in review (Taylor's version) In: The Washington Post, December 26, 2022 
  38. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  39. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  40. Adrian Horton: How Taylor Swift's Eras tour took over America In: The Guardian, May 29, 2023 
  41. Alim Kheraj: The curate's Easter egg: how Taylor Swift turned pop into a multiplayer puzzle In: The Guardian, November 9, 2022. Abgerufen im May 5, 2023 
  42. a b Vorlage:Cite magazine
  43. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  44. Emily Yahr: How the search for clues in Taylor Swift's music became all-consuming In: The Washington Post, October 20, 2022. Abgerufen im May 29, 2023 
  45. Madeline Merinuk: How Taylor Swift turned fandom into a scavenger hunt of clues. In: Today. 21. Oktober 2022, abgerufen am 23. September 2023.
  46. Attributed to many sources: null × null Vorlage:Cite magazine null × null Rebecca Nicholson: Richard Moore: even spies don't want to see our Wordle solutions In: The Guardian, February 5, 2022. Abgerufen im October 19, 2022  null × null Jordan Crucchiola: Let's Speculate Wildly About the Meaning of Taylor Swift's Lover Song Titles. In: Vulture. 16. August 2019, abgerufen am 19. Oktober 2022.
  47. Nadia Khomami: Where's Taylor Swift's scarf – is it in Jake Gyllenhaal's drawer? In: The Guardian, November 15, 2021. Abgerufen im March 6, 2022 
  48. Mia Mercado: Where the Hell Is Taylor Swift's Scarf? In: The Cut. 16. November 2021, abgerufen am 3. Februar 2022.
  49. Emily Yahr: The story behind Taylor Swift's 10-minute version of 'All Too Well', the song making fans lose their minds In: The Washington Post, November 12, 2021. Abgerufen im March 2, 2023 
  50. Justin Curto: Did 2020 Kill the Long, Fancy Pop-Album Rollout for Good? In: Vulture. 22. Dezember 2020, abgerufen am 27. Dezember 2020.
  51. Sarah Gambles: The ubiquitous power of Taylor Swift In: Deseret News, July 23, 2023 
  52. Vanessa Friedman: Taylor Swift and the Sparkling Trap of Constant Reinvention In: The New York Times, April 24, 2023. Abgerufen im June 20, 2023 
  53. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  54. Talia Lakritz: Taylor Swift embarks on her Eras Tour this spring. Here's a guide to every era of her groundbreaking career. Insider Inc., abgerufen am 15. Dezember 2022.
  55. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  56. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  57. Kate Pattison: How did Taylor Swift get so popular? She never goes out of style. In: The Conversation. 21. September 2023, abgerufen am 22. September 2023.
  58. Christopher Fanick: "Call It What You Want": The Impact of Fan Characteristics on Political Views. In: Communication Honors Theses. 1. Mai 2019 (trinity.edu).
  59. Christina Pazzanese: So what exactly makes Taylor Swift so great?, August 2, 2023. Abgerufen im August 7, 2023 
  60. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  61. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  62. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  63. Sian Cain: The Taylor Swift effect: why a mystery book is rocketing up US charts – despite no one knowing anything about it In: The Guardian, May 10, 2023 
  64. Donovan Brian: How Taylor Swift's Eras Tour transcended pop music, June 27, 2023. Abgerufen im July 2, 2023 
  65. Marco della Cava, Patrick Ryan: Taylor Swift is 'in a class of her own right now,' as Eras tour gives way to Eras movie In: USA Today, August 31, 2023. Abgerufen im September 1, 2023 
  66. # Grace Zokovitch: 'A legend's coming:' Taylor Swift mania descends on Boston ahead of weekend concerts In: Boston Herald, May 16, 2023. Abgerufen im May 29, 2023 
    1. Taylor Swift mania explained, May 26, 2023. Abgerufen im May 29, 2023 
    2. Ellen O'Reagan: Swiftflation: star's pulling power likely to push up prices In: The Irish Times, July 14, 2023. Abgerufen im July 15, 2023 
  67. Shirley McMarlin: How popular is Taylor Swift? It's the 2023 version of Beatlemania In: Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, June 13, 2023. Abgerufen im June 17, 2023 
  68. Jon Bream: Taylor Swift delivers the most fan-fulfilling concert of all time in Minneapolis In: Star Tribune, June 24, 2023 
  69. Gina Arnold: I Don’t Give a Damn About Your Bad Reputation: Taylor Swift, Beyoncé Knowles, and Performance. In: Contemporary Music Review. 40. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, 2. Januar 2021, ISSN 0749-4467, S. 27–40, doi:10.1080/07494467.2021.1945224 (englisch, tandfonline.com).
  70. Fawzia Khan: The Might Of Taylor Swift. 18. Juni 2021, archiviert vom Original am 28. Juni 2021; abgerufen am 20. Oktober 2021.
  71. Ben Sisario: Taylor Swift Criticism Spurs Apple to Change Royalties Policy In: The New York Times, June 21, 2015. Abgerufen im May 6, 2023 
  72. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  73. Nilay Patel: Taylor Swift doesn't understand supply and demand. In: Vox. 7. Juli 2014, abgerufen am 10. Mai 2023.
  74. Ben Sisario: Sales of Taylor Swift's 1989 Intensify Streaming Debate In: The New York Times, November 5, 2014. Abgerufen im February 27, 2019 
  75. Brian Mansfield: Officially Pop, Taylor Swift Embraces Being Unafraid. In: USA Today. 23. Oktober 2014, abgerufen am 22. Juni 2023.
  76. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  77. a b Constance Grady: Taylor Swift puts all her music back on streaming, continues to be a PR genius. In: Vox. 9. Juni 2017, abgerufen am 6. Mai 2023.
  78. Alex Young: Taylor Swift, the indisputable Queen of Vinyl, named 2022 Record Store Day Ambassador. In: Consequence. 20. Januar 2022, abgerufen am 6. März 2022.
  79. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  80. Tyler Golsen: Why Taylor Swift is the perfect ambassador for Record Store Day. In: Far Out Magazine. 20. Januar 2022, abgerufen am 21. Januar 2022.
  81. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  82. Taylor Swift fans share tips on how to make old 'Fearless' album disappear In: The Independent, April 9, 2021. Abgerufen im October 6, 2021 
  83. Spencer Kornhaber: Taylor Swift Is Waging Reputational Warfare. In: The Atlantic. 18. November 2019, abgerufen am 9. Mai 2022.
  84. Lars Brandle: Taylor Swift Fans Launch Online Petition Against Scooter Braun, Scott Borchetta. In: The Hollywood Reporter. 14. November 2019, abgerufen am 10. Mai 2022.
  85. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  86. Kate Kelly, Joe Coscarelli, Ben Sisario: How Taylor Swift Dragged Private Equity into Her Fight Over Music Rights In: The New York Times, November 24, 2019. Abgerufen im December 10, 2021 
  87. Taylor Swift sics fans on Scooter Braun, The Carlyle Group. In: The A. V. Club. 15. November 2019, abgerufen am 10. Dezember 2021.
  88. Meera Jagannathan: Taylor Swift is squaring off with private-equity giant Carlyle Group – here's how the combatants stack up. In: MarketWatch. Abgerufen am 10. Dezember 2021.
  89. Maria Psyllou: Taylor Swift's Eras tour: A harmonious overture of the trickle-down effect on local economies. University of Birmingham, 18. August 2023, abgerufen am 19. August 2023.
  90. Erica Pandey: Inside the booming Taylor Swift economy. In: Axios. 12. Mai 2023, abgerufen am 15. Mai 2023.
  91. Juliana Kaplan: Welcome to Swift City: When Taylor Swift comes to town, businesses build new bars, prepare thousands of cookies, and welcome over 150,000 Swifties. In: Business Insider. Abgerufen am 12. April 2023.
  92. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  93. Jeff Jeffrey: How Taylor Swift's Eras Tour boosted Houston's hotels. In: Houston Business Journal. 3. Mai 2023, abgerufen am 4. Mai 2023.
  94. Augusta Savaira: Welcome to 'Swiftonomics': What Taylor Swift reveals about the U.S. economy In: Los Angeles Times, November 23, 2022 
  95. Frank Pallotta: Taylor Swift tickets listed for thousands on StubHub after millions flood Ticketmaster, November 16, 2022 
  96. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  97. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  98. Annabelle Timsit: Ticketmaster to sell some fans more Taylor Swift tickets after presale fiasco In: The Washington Post, December 14, 2022. Abgerufen im December 15, 2022 
  99. Chris DeVille: Taylor Swift Ticket Debacle: Lawmakers Demand Breakup Of Ticketmaster "Monopoly". In: Stereogum. 16. November 2022, abgerufen am 17. November 2022.
  100. David McCabe, Ben Sisario: Justice Department Said to Investigate Ticketmaster's Parent Company In: The New York Times, November 18, 2022 
  101. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  102. Owen Tucker-Smith: How Biden and Taylor Swift beat Ticketmaster In: Los Angeles Times, June 15, 2023. Abgerufen im June 16, 2023 
  103. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  104. 2022's biggest pop culture news stories. In: The A.V. Club. 29. Dezember 2022, abgerufen am 30. Dezember 2022.
  105. Allison Morrow: One nation, under Swift, January 25, 2023. Abgerufen im January 27, 2023 
  106. Rebecca Jennings: Staring down 30 at the Taylor Swift dance party. In: Vox. 1. Juni 2022, abgerufen am 28. November 2022.
  107. Emerald Bensadoun: Taylor Swift dance parties are the benevolent alternative to clubbing you never knew you needed In: The Globe and Mail, November 26, 2022. Abgerufen im November 28, 2022 
  108. Arwa Mahdawi: Taylor Swift rules the airwaves! But that's bad news for music In: The Guardian, July 26, 2023 
  109. Kate Solomon: 'I love being part of a collective female experience': inside the all-Taylor Swift club night sweeping the UK In: The Guardian, August 9, 2023. Abgerufen im August 13, 2023 
  110. Saleah Blancaflor, Ellyn Briggs: The Taylor Swift Fandom Is White, Suburban and Leans Democratic. 14. März 2023, abgerufen am 15. Mai 2023.
  111. Brooke Schultz: Taylor Swift ticket trouble could drive political engagement, November 22, 2022. Abgerufen im November 23, 2022 
  112. Patricia Grisafi: Matty Healy exposed the dark side of the Taylor Swift parasocial fantasy, June 6, 2023. Abgerufen im June 7, 2023 
  113. Ayesha Rascoe: Taylor Swift fans are upset over reports of her breakup. A psychologist explains why. NPR, 17. April 2023, abgerufen am 7. Juni 2023.
  114. Christi Carras: Wedding Crashers (Taylor's Version): Swifties swarm Jack Antonoff and Margaret Qualley's nuptials In: Los Angeles Times, August 21, 2023. Abgerufen im September 1, 2023 
  115. Chris Panella: Taylor Swift fans sent me death threats, doxxed my family, and accused me of being a pedophile after I criticized her Eras Tour. Insider Inc., abgerufen am 23. September 2023.
  116. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  117. Vorlage:Cite magazine
  118. Amanda Arnold, Melinda Fakuade: Untangling the Incredibly Complicated Taylor Swift–Scooter Braun Feud. In: The Cut. 22. November 2019, abgerufen am 13. Februar 2021.
  119. Katie Rosseinsky: How Taylor Swift is changing the music industry a re-record at a time In: Evening Standard, November 15, 2021. Abgerufen im April 19, 2022 
  120. Sources on Gaylor:
  121. a b c Cristina Lopez, Avneesh Chandra: Now We Got Bad Blood. Graphika, 12. April 2023, abgerufen am 29. Mai 2023.
  122. Lisa Guiterrez: Taylor Swift and her fans are such a phenomenon, this KU professor is studying them In: The Kansas City Star, May 24, 2023. Abgerufen im June 5, 2023