Zum Inhalt springen

Out-of-place-Artefakt

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Dies ist eine alte Version dieser Seite, zuletzt bearbeitet am 21. Oktober 2012 um 06:28 Uhr durch en>Againme (As per main article). Sie kann sich erheblich von der aktuellen Version unterscheiden.

Vorlage:Redirect Out-of-place artifact (OOPArt) is a term coined by American naturalist and cryptozoologist Ivan T. Sanderson for an object of historical, archaeological, or paleontological interest found in a very unusual or seemingly impossible context[1] that could challenge conventional historical chronology.

The term "out-of-place artifact" is rarely used by mainstream historians or scientists. Its use is largely confined to cryptozoologists, proponents of ancient astronaut theories, Young Earth creationists, and paranormal enthusiasts.[2] The term is used to describe a wide variety of objects, from anomalies studied by mainstream science to pseudoarchaeology far outside the mainstream, to objects that have been shown to be hoaxes or to have mundane explanations.

Critics argue that most purported OOPArts which are not hoaxes are the result of mistaken interpretation, wishful thinking, or a mistaken belief that a particular culture couldn't have created an artifact or technology due to a lack of knowledge or materials. Supporters regard OOPArts as evidence that mainstream science is overlooking huge areas of knowledge, either willfully or through ignorance.[2]

In some cases, the uncertainty results from inaccurate descriptions. For example: the Wolfsegg Iron was said to be a perfect cube, but in fact it is not; the Klerksdorp spheres were said to be perfect spheres, but they are not; and the Iron pillar of Delhi was said to be stainless, but it has some rust near its base.

Many writers or researchers who question conventional views of human history have used purported OOPArts in attempts to bolster their arguments.[2] Creation Science relies on allegedly anomalous finds in the archaeological record to challenge scientific chronologies and models of human evolution.[3] Claimed OOPArts have been used to support religious descriptions of pre-history, ancient astronaut theories, or the notion of vanished civilizations that possessed knowledge or technology more advanced than our own.[2]

Validation

In rare cases, a claim is validated by mainstream science; i.e., it is proven that some artifact was created with a technology not previously thought to have existed in the ancient culture that built it. One piece that changed mainstream understanding of ancient technology is the Antikythera mechanism, a type of mechanical computer[4][5] which has been fully validated as a real object from about 150–100 BCE. Before X-ray examination, its clockwork-like appearance (dating about 1,000 years before clocks were invented) was cited as evidence of alien visitation by fringe sources.[6]

A partially validated example is the Maine penny, from the Goddard site in Blue Hill, Maine, United States. It is an 11th century Norse coin found in an American Indian shell midden. Over 20,000 objects were found over a 15-year period at the site. The sole non-Native artifact was the coin.[7] Some argue it demonstrates Norse visits to North America unknown to archaeology; mainstream belief is that it was brought to the site from Labrador or Newfoundland by native trade.[8]

Examples

These are examples of objects that have been argued by various fringe authors (see list) to have been OOPArts. They are categorised according to their current status in the eyes of the mainstream scientific community (for references on this, see the linked article on each item). Here "validation" means that the object in question has been validated as evidence of technological developments that were present in an ancient society and which were previously unknown to us.

Fully validated

Partially validated

  • Maine penny: May be a sign of pre-Columbian Norse contact with the New World.
  • Tecaxic-Calixtlahuaca head: said to be a bust in the Classical Roman style, found in a burial offering under three intact floors of a pre-colonial building dated between 1476 and 1510.

Unconfirmed objects

  • Dorchester Pot: a metal pot claimed to have been blasted out of solid rock in 1852.
  • Kingoodie artifact: an object resembling a corroded nail, said to have been encased in solid rock.
  • Fuente Magna: A bowl with what appears to be a Sumerian inscription on it, but was found in Tiwanaku.
  • Grieskirchen Ball: A large metal ball found whilst excavating for a new road in Upper Austria.[9]

Formerly orthodox interpretations of artifacts

Unorthodox interpretations of real ancient artifacts

The iron pillar of Delhi
Datei:Avion quimbaya.jpg
One of Quimbaya "airplanes"

Debunked

Natural objects mistaken for artifacts

Erroneously dated objects

  • Coso artifact: Thought to be prehistoric; actually a 1920s spark plug.
  • Malachite Man: Thought to be from the early Cretaceous; actually a post-Columbian burial.
  • Wolfsegg Iron: Thought to be from the Tertiary epoch; actually from an early mining operation. Inaccurately described as a perfect cube.

Modern-day creations

An Ica stone depicting a dragon-like animal

Entirely fictional

See also

Authors and works:

References

  1. David Hatcher Childress: Lost cities of Atlantis, ancient Europe & the Mediterranean. Adventures Unlimited Press, 1996, ISBN 0-932813-25-9 (google.com [abgerufen am 19. April 2010]).
  2. a b c d Andrew O'Hehir: Archaeology from the dark side. Salon.com, abgerufen am 19. April 2010.
  3. Stromberg, P., and P.V. Heinrich, 2004, The Coso Artifact Mystery from the Depths of Time?, Reports of the National Center for Science Education. v. 24, no. 2, pp. 26-30 (March/April 2004)
  4. "The Antikythera Mechanism Research Project", The Antikythera Mechanism Research Project. Retrieved 2007-07-01 Quote: "The Antikythera Mechanism is now understood to be dedicated to astronomical phenomena and operates as a complex mechanical "computer" which tracks the cycles of the Solar System."
  5. Nicholas Paphitis: Experts: Fragments an Ancient Computer In: The Washington Post, December 1, 2006 „Imagine tossing a top-notch laptop into the sea, leaving scientists from a foreign culture to scratch their heads over its corroded remains centuries later. A Roman shipmaster inadvertently did something just like it 2,000 years ago off southern Greece, experts said late Thursday.“ 
  6. The Antikythera Mechanism. Skeptoid.com, abgerufen am 24. August 2011.
  7. Bye, Columbus In: Time, December 11, 1978 
  8. Vinland Archeology. Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, abgerufen am 24. August 2011.
  9. Mystery Ball is a Meteorite Claim. Croatiantimes.com, 19. September 2012, abgerufen am 27. September 2012.

Against OOPArts Vorlage:Commons category