Zum Inhalt springen

Populärer als Jesus

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Dies ist eine alte Version dieser Seite, zuletzt bearbeitet am 18. August 2014 um 21:30 Uhr durch HandsomeFella (Diskussion | Beiträge) (copyedit). Sie kann sich erheblich von der aktuellen Version unterscheiden.

Vorlage:Good article Vorlage:Use British English Vorlage:The Beatles history

"More popular than Jesus" was a controversial remark made by the Beatles' John Lennon in 1966. Lennon said that Christianity was in decline and that the Beatles had become more popular than Jesus Christ. The comment drew no controversy when originally published, but angry reactions flared up in Christian communities when it was republished in the United States five months later.

Lennon had originally made the remark in March 1966 during an interview with Maureen Cleave for the London Evening Standard in the United Kingdom, which drew no public reaction. When Datebook, a US teen magazine, quoted Lennon's comments in August, five months later, extensive protests broke out in the Southern United States. The Beatles' records were banned on the radio and publicly burned, press conferences were cancelled and threats were made. The controversy coincided with the group's US tour in August 1966, and Lennon and Brian Epstein attempted to quell the dispute at a series of press conferences. Some tour events experienced disruption and intimidation, including a picketing by the Ku Klux Klan. The controversy contributed to the Beatles' lack of interest in public live performances, and the US tour was the last they undertook, after which they became a studio-only band.

Background

John Lennon at JFK Airport, New York, in February 1964, two years before the controversy

In March 1966, the London Evening Standard ran a weekly series of articles entitled "How Does a Beatle Live?"Vorlage:Sfn which featured John Lennon, Ringo Starr, George Harrison, and Paul McCartney respectively. The articles were completed by journalist Maureen Cleave,Vorlage:Sfn who knew the group well and had interviewed them regularly since the start of Beatlemania in the UK. Three years previously she had written they were "the darlings of Merseyside",Vorlage:Sfn and had accompanied them on the plane on the group's first US tour in February 1964.Vorlage:SfnVorlage:Sfn For her lifestyle series in March 1966, she chose to interview the group individually, rather than all together, as was the norm.Vorlage:Sfn

Cleave interviewed Lennon on 4 March 1966. At his home, Kenwood, in Weybridge, she found a full-size crucifix, a gorilla costume, a medieval suit of armourVorlage:Sfn and a well-organised library, with works by Alfred, Lord Tennyson, Jonathan Swift, Oscar Wilde, George Orwell, Aldous Huxley,Vorlage:Sfn and The Passover Plot, by Hugh J. Schonfield, which had influenced Lennon's ideas about Christianity.Vorlage:Sfn Cleave's article mentioned that Lennon was "reading extensively about religion",Vorlage:Sfn and quoted a comment he made:

Vorlage:Blockquote

Cleave's interview with Lennon was published in the Evening Standard in March 1966 and provoked no public reaction in the UK.Vorlage:Sfn Church attendance there was in decline and the Christian churches were making no secret of their efforts to transform their image into something more relevant to modern times.Vorlage:Sfn Music historian Jonathan Gould wrote, "The satire comedians had had a field day with the increasingly desperate attempts of the Church to make itself seem more relevant ('Don't call me vicar, call me Dick ...')."Vorlage:Sfn In 1963, the Anglican Bishop of Woolwich, John A. T. Robinson, published a controversial but popular book, Honest to God, urging the nation to reject traditional church teachings on morality and the concept of God as an "old man in the sky", and instead embrace a universal ethic of love.Vorlage:Sfn Bryan R. Wilson's 1966 text Religion in Secular Society explained that increasing secularization led to British churches being abandoned. However, in the US, churches remained popular.[1]

Both McCartney and Harrison had been baptised in the Roman Catholic Church, but neither of them followed Christianity.[2] At the start of Beatlemania, the group came into contact with the Revd Ronald Gibbons, who told reporters that a Beatles version of "O Come All Ye Faithful" might provide the Church of England with "the very shot in the arm it needs".Vorlage:Sfn

Response in the US

The day after Cleave's article appeared in the Evening Standard, Beatles press officer Tony Barrow offered Datebook, a US teen magazine, rights to all four interviews. Barrow believed the pieces were important to show fans that the Beatles were progressing beyond simple pop music and producing more intellectually challenging work. As Datebook had already run pieces on fashion designer Mary Quant and on the effects of LSD, it seemed like a suitable vehicle to carry this information.Vorlage:Sfn

In late July 1966, nearly five months after UK publication, Datebook republished the interviews. However, art editor Art Unger decided to deliberately put Lennon's quote about Christianity on its front cover, cutting the prose before it.Vorlage:Sfn[3] In Birmingham, Alabama, WAQY DJ Tommy Charles heard about the quotation from his coworker Doug Layton, and was immediately incensed, saying "That does it for me. I am not going to play the Beatles any more".Vorlage:Sfn Charles and Layton asked for listeners' views on Lennon's comment and the response was overwhelmingly negative.Vorlage:Sfn Charles later stated, "We just felt it was so absurd and sacrilegious that something ought to be done to show them that they can't get away with this sort of thing".Vorlage:Sfn Al Benn, who was the Bureau Manager for United Press International News, heard the WAQY show and immediately filed a news report in New York, culminating in a front page news story in The New York Times on 5 August.Vorlage:Sfn Around two dozen other stations followed WAQY's lead with similar announcements. Some stations in the Deep South went further, organising demonstrations with bonfires, drawing hordes of teenagers to publicly burn their Beatles records and other memorabilia.Vorlage:Sfn

During the Beatles' performance at Mid-South Coliseum, Memphis, Tennessee, on 19 August 1966, a firecracker was set off onstage.

Epstein was so concerned by the reaction that he considered cancelling the group's upcoming US tour, believing they would be seriously harmed in some way.Vorlage:Sfn He then flew to the US and held a press conference in New York City, where he publicly criticised Datebook, saying the magazine had taken Lennon's words out of context, and expressed regret on behalf of the group that "people with certain religious beliefs should have been offended in any way".Vorlage:Sfn Epstein's efforts had little effect, as the controversy quickly spread beyond the borders of the US. In Mexico City there were demonstrations against the group, and a number of countries, including South Africa and Spain,[4] made the decision to ban the Beatles' music on national radio stations.Vorlage:Sfn The Vatican issued a public denouncement of Lennon's comments.[2]

The Beatles left for their US tour on 11 August 1966. According to Lennon's wife, Cynthia, he was nervous and upset that he had made people angry simply by expressing his opinion.Vorlage:Sfn The Beatles attended a press conference in Chicago, Illinois; Lennon did not want to apologise but was advised by Epstein and Barrow that he should.Vorlage:Sfn Lennon quipped that "if I had said television was more popular than Jesus, I might have got away with it"Vorlage:Sfn but stressed that he was simply remarking on how other people viewed and popularised the band. He described his own belief in God by quoting the Bishop of Woolwich, saying, "... not as an old man in the sky. I believe that what people call God is something in all of us."Vorlage:Sfn Adamant that he was not comparing himself with Christ, he tried to explain the decline of Christianity in the UK. Pressed for an apology by a reporter, he said "if you want me to apologise, if that will make you happy, then OK, I'm sorry."Vorlage:Sfn Journalists gave a sympathetic response, and told Lennon that the Bible Belt were "quite notorious for their Christian attitude."Vorlage:Sfn

When the tour began, it was marred by protests and disturbances.Vorlage:Sfn Telephone threats were received, and concerts were picketed by the Ku Klux Klan.Vorlage:Sfn Daily Express writer Robert Pitman, responding to the US outcry, wrote, "It seems a nerve for Americans to hold up shocked hands, when week in, week out, America is exporting to us a subculture that makes the Beatles seem like four stern old churchwardens."Vorlage:Sfn The reaction was also criticised in the US; a Kentucky radio station declared that it would give the Beatles' music airplay to show its "contempt for hypocrisy personified", and the Jesuit magazine America wrote: "Lennon was simply stating what many a Christian educator would readily admit".Vorlage:Sfn

The Memphis city council, aware that a Beatles concert was scheduled at the Mid-South Coliseum during the tour, voted to cancel it rather than have "municipal facilities be used as a forum to ridicule anyone's religion", and also saying, "the Beatles are not welcome in Memphis".Vorlage:Sfn The Ku Klux Klan nailed a Beatles album to a wooden cross, vowing "vengeance", with conservative groups staging further public burnings of Beatles records.Vorlage:Sfn The Reverend Jimmy Stroad stated that a Christian rally in Memphis "would give the youth of the mid-South an opportunity to show Jesus Christ is more popular than the Beatles".Vorlage:Sfn The Memphis shows did take place on 19 August;Vorlage:Sfn the afternoon show went as planned, but there was a minor panic when a firecracker was set off on stage during the evening performance,[5] which led the group to believe they were the target of gunfire.Vorlage:Sfn

The group hated the tour, partly due to the controversy and adverse reaction from Lennon's comments, and were unhappy about Epstein continuing to organise live performances that were increasingly at odds with their studio work.Vorlage:Sfn Harrison seriously contemplated leaving the band, but was persuaded to stay on the condition that the Beatles would from now on be a studio-only group.Vorlage:Sfn After a break, they reconvened to record Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, which drew strong commercial success and critical praise when released in June 1967.Vorlage:Sfn

Aftermath

Lennon was asked about the controversy three years later during a trip to Canada, in 1969. He repeated his opinion that the Beatles were more influential on young people than Christ, adding that some ministers had agreed with him. He called the protestors in the US "fascist Christians", saying he was "very big on Christ. I've always fancied him. He was right."Vorlage:Sfn In 1978, he thanked Jesus for an end to the Beatles' touring, saying "if I hadn't said [that] and upset the very Christian Ku Klux Klan, well, Lord, I might still be up there with all the other performing fleas! God bless America. Thank you, Jesus."[6]

In 1993, Michael Medved wrote in The Sunday Times that "today, comments like Lennon's could never cause controversy; a contemptuous attitude to religion is all but expected from all mainstream pop performers."Vorlage:Sfn In 1997, Noel Gallagher claimed that "Oasis are bigger than God", but reaction was minimal.Vorlage:Sfn

In a 2008 article marking the 40th anniversary of the Beatles' double album The Beatles (also known as the "White Album"), the Vatican newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano, issued the statement: Vorlage:Blockquote

In response to the statement, Starr said "Didn't the Vatican say we were satanic or possibly satanic, and they've still forgiven us? I think the Vatican's got more to talk about than the Beatles."[7][8] In its 14 April 2010 edition, L'Osservatore Romano responded to Starr's comments, stating that "John Lennon had no need of forgiveness from the Vatican, L'Osservatore Romano reprinted its 1966 article on John Lennon's comments. The 1966 L'Osservatore Romano article noted that Lennon had apologised for his comments and that fellow Beatle Paul McCartney had criticized them."[9] In 2010, Starr said that he had now found religion, adding, "For me, God is in my life ... I think the search has been on since the 1960s."[2]

Other mentions

On 18 May 1968, Lennon summoned the other Beatles to a meeting at Apple Corps to announce that he was the living reincarnation of Jesus: "I have something very important to tell you all. I am Jesus Christ. I'm back again."Vorlage:Sfn The meeting was adjourned for lunch and Lennon never mentioned the subject again.Vorlage:Sfn In May 1969, Lennon and McCartney recorded "The Ballad of John and Yoko", with Lennon singing the lines, "Christ, you know it ain't easy, You know how hard it can be, The way things are going, They're gonna crucify me."Vorlage:Sfn In a BBC interview a few months later, Lennon called himself "One of Christ's biggest fans", talked about the Church of England, his vision of heaven, and unhappiness over being unable to marry Yoko Ono in church.[10]

On 3 December 1969,Vorlage:Sfn Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice asked Lennon to play the part of Jesus in the stage production of Jesus Christ Superstar, which he declined,Vorlage:Sfn although he said he would have been interested if Ono could play the part of Mary Magdalene.[11] Lennon mentioned Jesus again in his 1970 song, "God", singing, "I don't believe in Jesus", but also sang that he did not believe in the Bible, Buddha, Gita, and the Beatles.Vorlage:Sfn Whilst living in Los Angeles with May Pang, Lennon once said to DJ Wolfman Jack, "To boogie or not to boogie, that is the Christian."[12] Critics of Lennon's lyrics also focused the line "Imagine there's no heaven" on Lennon's 1971 song, "Imagine".Vorlage:Sfn

Lennon was murdered on 8 December 1980 by Mark David Chapman, who had become a born-again Christian in 1970Vorlage:Sfn and was incensed by Lennon's "more popular than Jesus" remark, calling it blasphemy. He later stated that he was further enraged by the songs "God" and "Imagine"—even singing the latter with the altered lyric: "Imagine John Lennon dead".Vorlage:Sfn

See also

Notes

Citations

Vorlage:Reflist

Sources

Vorlage:Refbegin

Vorlage:Refend

Vorlage:The Beatles main Vorlage:John Lennon Vorlage:Use dmy dates

Vorlage:Link FA

  1. Secularisation in the Christian World: Essays in Honour of Hugh McLeod. Ashgate Publishing, 2010, ISBN 978-0-7546-6131-3.
  2. a b c Nick Pisa: Vatican forgives The Beatles for 'bigger than Jesus' comment In: The Daily Telegraph, 11 April 2010. Abgerufen im 5 August 2014 
  3. Maurice Chittenden: John Lennon forgiven for Jesus claim In: The Sunday Times, 23 November 2008. Abgerufen im 2 June 2011 
  4. South Africa Squashes Beatles, 9 August 1966, S. 6 
  5. Jay Spangler: Beatles Interview: Memphis, Tennessee. Beatles Interviews, 19. August 1966, abgerufen am 2. Juni 2011.
  6. Referenzfehler: Ungültiges <ref>-Tag; kein Text angegeben für Einzelnachweis mit dem Namen LennonIKnew.
  7. Vatican "Forgives" Beatles; Ringo Starr Says Bugger Off. In: iNEWP.com. 15. April 2010, abgerufen am 3. August 2011.
  8. Phil Han: Ringo Starr: 'Vatican has more to talk about than the Beatles'. CNN, 12. April 2010, abgerufen am 3. August 2011.
  9. "Vatican newspaper responds to Ringo Starr's dismissal of Beatles coverage". CatholicCulture.org, Catholic World News. 14 April 2010. Retrieved 18 November 2013.
  10. Jonathan Wynne-Jones: Bigger than Jesus? The Beatles were a Christian band In: The Daily Telegraph, 12 July 2008. Abgerufen im 1 August 2012 
  11. Lennon Won't Play Jesus, 5 December 1969, S. 2 
  12. Dana Cook: Imagine all the people. Salon Media Group, Inc., 8. Dezember 2005, abgerufen am 5. Juli 2011.