Out-of-place-Artefakt

Artefakt von historischem, archäologischem oder paläontologischem Interesse
Dies ist eine alte Version dieser Seite, zuletzt bearbeitet am 9. Oktober 2010 um 18:49 Uhr durch en>Auric (With some scientific validation). Sie kann sich erheblich von der aktuellen Version unterscheiden.

Out-of-place artifact (OOPArt) is a term coined by American naturalist and cryptozoologist Ivan T. Sanderson for an object of historical, archaeological, or paleontological interest found in a very unusual or seemingly impossible context[1] that could challenge conventional historical chronology.

The term "out-of-place artifact" is rarely used by mainstream historians or scientists. Its use is largely confined to cryptozoologists, proponents of ancient astronaut theories, and paranormal enthusiasts.[2] The term is used to describe a wide variety of objects, from anomalies studied by mainstream science to pseudoarchaeology far outside the mainstream, to objects that have been shown to be hoaxes or to have mundane explanations.

Critics argue that most purported OOPArts which are not hoaxes are the result of mistaken interpretation, wishful thinking, or a mistaken belief that a particular culture couldn't have created an artifact or technology due to a lack of knowledge or materials. Supporters regard OOParts as evidence that mainstream science is overlooking huge areas of knowledge, either willfully or through ignorance.[2]

In some cases, the uncertainty results from inaccurate descriptions. For example: the Wolfsegg Iron was said to be a perfect cube, but in fact it is not; the Klerksdorp spheres were said to be perfect spheres, but they are not; and the Iron pillar of Delhi was said to be stainless, but it has some rust near its base.

Validation

In rare cases, the validity of claims is validated by mainstream science; i.e., it is proven that some artifact was created with a technology not previously thought to have existed in the ancient culture that built it (see "fully validated" example).

OOPArts are often Vorlage:Weasel-inline of interest to creationists and others who seek evidence that may refute the theory of evolution or support the notion of a global flood. They are also used to support religious descriptions of pre-history, ancient astronaut theories, or the notion of vanished civilizations that possessed knowledge or technology more advanced than our own. Many writers or researchers who question or challenge conventional views of human history have used purported OOPArts in attempts to bolster their arguments.[2]

Examples

These are examples of objects that have been argued by various fringe authors (see list) to have been OOPArts. They are categorised according to their current status in the eyes of the mainstream scientific community (for references on this, see the linked article on each item). Here "validation" means that the object in question has been validated as evidence of technological developments that were present in an ancient society and which were previously unknown to us.

Entirely fictional

The Dropa stones.

Debunked or unconfirmed

The Baigong Pipes, the Baghdad Battery, the Iron pillar of Delhi, the Wolfsegg Iron, the Fuente Magna, the Iron Man (Eiserne Mann), the Shakōkidogū, the Lake Winnipesaukee mystery stone, the Crystal skulls, the Tecaxic-Calixtlahuaca head, the Coso Artifact, the Dorchester Pot, the Eltanin Antenna, the Dendra Lamps, the Saqqara Bird, the Baalbek megaliths, the Ica stones, the Acámbaro figures, the stone spheres of Costa Rica, the Malachite Man, the Kensington Runestone, the Nazca Lines, the Kingoodie artifact, Pacal's sarcophagus lid, and the Klerksdorp spheres.

With some scientific validation

The Maine penny, from the Goddard site in Blue Hill, Maine, is an 11th century Norse coin found in an American Indian shell midden. Over 20,000 objects were found over a 15-year period at the site. The sole non-Native artifact was the coin.[3] Some argue it demonstrates Norse visits to North America unknown to archaeology; mainstream belief is that it was brought to the site by a native trader from near Labrador.[4]

Fully validated

A piece that changed mainstream understanding of ancient technology is the Antikythera mechanism, a type of mechanical computer[5][6] which has been fully validated as a real object from about 150–100 BC. Before X-ray examination, its clockwork-like appearance (dating about 1,000 years before clocks were invented) was cited as evidence of alien visitation.[7]

See also

Authors and works:

References

  1. David Hatcher Childress: Lost cities of Atlantis, ancient Europe & the Mediterranean. Adventures Unlimited Press, 1996, ISBN 0-932813-25-9 (google.com [abgerufen am 19. April 2010]).
  2. a b c Andrew O'Hehir: Archaeology from the dark side. Salon.com, abgerufen am 19. April 2010.
  3. Bye, Columbus In: Time, Dec. 11, 1978 
  4. Vinland Archeology
  5. "The Antikythera Mechanism Research Project", The Antikythera Mechanism Research Project. Retrieved 2007-07-01 Quote: "The Antikythera Mechanism is now understood to be dedicated to astronomical phenomena and operates as a complex mechanical "computer" which tracks the cycles of the Solar System."
  6. Washington Post Quote: Imagine tossing a top-notch laptop into the sea, leaving scientists from a foreign culture to scratch their heads over its corroded remains centuries later. A Roman shipmaster inadvertently did something just like it 2,000 years ago off southern Greece, experts said late Thursday.
  7. [1]

Vorlage:Commons category