维基百科:模板編輯員

模板編輯員是一群在社群中被信任的，精通於維基語法的人。他們可以編輯受到WP:保護#模板保護的模板以及模組，這些模板/模組是一些複雜的高風險模板/模組。 模板編輯員也可以編輯所有頁面的編輯提示，而不只是用戶頁及用戶討論頁的編輯提示。

目前中文維基百科還沒有模板編輯員，理由是部分管理員認為還不需要引入。

用途

模板編輯員被允許使用此權限進行維護，回答合理的編輯請求，並對於模板， 模組，以及編輯提示做出合理並無爭議的小編輯。 他們也被允許在“測試沙盒”中首次進行這些編輯之後，儲存更複雜或有爭議的編輯。他們的技術以及可靠性，是編者們經過討論後的共識。

設立難以破解的用戶密碼

如果您是一位模板編輯員，請確認您有一個強密碼，並在安全的環境下編輯。（避免被記錄密碼或竊取帳號）因為一個對於高風險模板的編輯會影響多個頁面，不安全的帳戶將被封禁，並且基於站點安全性，取消其權限。 若您的帳戶遭到破解，請立即通知管理員，以便他們可以封禁您的帳戶並取消任何的特殊權限以防止破壞。

明智的編輯

明智的編輯模板的關鍵是在您儲存編輯前實際的測試您的更改。 每個模板有一個預設的測試用子頁面，其應該用於測試您的模板編輯。測試您的更改是否有任何錯誤，這一點非常重要。如果您擁有良好的測試習慣，將會很容易被發現。

• 請記住模板編輯員之間的關係， 就如同管理員之間的關係一樣， 永遠都不是在爭論中加強您的觀點的一種特權。做為一個模板編輯員讓您處於一個複雜的位置，因為您所做的任何編輯都是正常編輯和特殊操作。 如果有部分用戶反對某一更改，避免做出單方面的決定。您可以在模板討論頁上提出一個修改，若在幾天後沒有反對意見，那麼您就可以實行您所提出的編輯。 請使用您自己的判斷力來推測您的修改可能有多大的爭議。您必須對您所做的所有修改負責，並接受其他人提出的任何疑慮或投訴。

重複違反這些規則可能會導致您的權限被移除，如果您嚴重違反這些規則，任何管理員都有權利立即撤銷您的模板編輯者的權限，即使是第一次的違規也無須警告。

其他考慮

模板編輯員 should be aware of what kind of 編輯 require gathering consensus beforehand and which don't。 Remember to be civil when engaging in editing disputes。

It is a plus for 編輯員s in general to be aware of the implications of 編輯 to highly transcluded 模板s。 In particular， many small 編輯 to these 模板s in a short time may backlog the job queue， causing pages using the 模板s not to be re-updated quickly。 (In some circumstances， pages may not be updated even a week after a change to a very highly transcluded 模板 or module。)

Note that 模板 protection is not a guard against inexperienced 編輯員s trying their hands on 模板s per se， nor to guard against repeated 編輯， nor to shut out 編輯員s not acting on consensus。 Vandalism or misinformation on a high-risk 模板 would be visible on many pages that transclude them， which is considered the primary reason for preemptive 模板 protection。

When to seek discussion for 模板 編輯

編輯 that should be made ONLY after substantial discussion

• Any breaking 編輯， no matter how small。 If it removes a parameter， or 編輯 expected parameter behavior， do not do it without strong consensus， unless your reason for doing so is absolutely critical。
• 編輯 that significantly affect a 模板 or module's visual appearance to the reader。 "Hey， wouldn't it be cool if {{infobox}} were in shades of pink?"。。。 bring it up on the talkpage first。

編輯 that require at least some discussion， or at least several days passing with no one commenting on your proposal

• The addition of new parameters， if they'll significantly change the 模板's usage or display。 This includes adding numbered parameters as aliases for named parameters， adding additional numbered parameters to ones already in use， or adding any parameters that allow major， visually noticeable 編輯 (e。g。 a {{{color}}} parameter on {{infobox}})。
• Visual layout 編輯 that are minor but still noticeable， e。g。 swapping the order of a few parameters in an infobox， or slightly tweaking something's color。
• Per RFC consensus (2013)， it's best to seek consensus before adding Wikidata functionality to a 模板 or module。 As of 2016， using Wikidata in 模板s， particularly infoboxes， is still relatively contentious。

編輯 that can usually be made unilaterally， but which， depending on the circumstances， you may want to open up for discussion first

• The addition of new parameters that add minor functionality—for instance， an italic=yes or a noprint=yes。
• Edits that affect a 模板's appearance， but only slightly， such as the use of the nowrap class on a 模板 that looks better on one line。

編輯 that can almost always be made unilaterally

• Fixes of obvious markup errors。
• The addition of code comments where helpful， and any other 編輯 that improve the legibility of the code without altering functionality (within reason; no "{{{parameter|fallback}}}<!-- this looks to see if 'parameter' is called， and， if not， assigns value 'fallback' -->")
• 編輯 to anything <noinclude/>'d。
• Copy-edits of any sort。 (Just be sure you're right!)
• Non-controversial 編輯 to hidden tracking categories。
• 編輯 to CSS classes with no visible effect， or where the visible effect will be an unambiguous improvement (e。g。 removing excess whitespace in a 模板's output in certain browsers)。
• The deprecation of other 模板s used within a given 模板， provided that said deprecation is based on a prior consensus。

Abuse

Vandalism

If you use this right for anything even vaguely resembling vandalism， you will be blocked immediately。 Wikipedia maintains an active policy of "shoot first， ask questions later" when it comes to anything involving widely transcluded 模板s and/or 模板s used on the Main Page。 If you hold privileged access on any other projects， you may very well find your account locked by the stewards until you can prove you are in control of it。 Even if it is all a misunderstanding， you may lose your 模板-編輯員 privileges nonetheless if you are found to have behaved recklessly or erratically。

The same goes for vandalism that doesn't involve this right。 This is， fundamentally， an administrative-level right， and you are expected to behave with the accountability and stability that entails。 Administrators have been desysopped for inappropriate behavior， even when that behavior didn't involve their tools， or never affected a single article。 Considering that this right gives you some of the abilities that people are most afraid of falling into the hands of a rogue admin， the same goes for you， except that desysops take three arbitrators and a bureaucrat while blocking you only takes one admin。

Don't mess around。 Period。

Editing disputes

This right should never be used to gain an upper hand in editing disputes。 You have a privilege that most people do not have。 The normal BOLD， revert， discuss cycle does not apply because those without this right are unable to perform the "revert" step。 Therefore， if your edit is or may be controversial (see the "When to seek discussion" criteria above)， avoid making unilateral decisions， and instead propose the change on the 模板's talk page， and then make the change if there are no objections after a few days。 Do not change the 模板 to your preferred version when consensus has not been achieved yet to resolve the dispute。

Dispute with a fellow 模板 編輯員

A 模板 編輯員 should not revert the edit of his peer on a protected 模板 without good cause， careful thought and (if possible) a prior brief discussion with the 模板 編輯員 whose action is challenged。 It is the responsibility of the reverting 模板 編輯員 to demonstrate his revert is not out of sheer reflex。 When a 模板 編輯員's edit is reversed by a peer， the edit (or a similar one) must not be reinstated by the original or another 模板 編輯員 without clear discussion leading to a consensus decision。

Requesting

If you wish to request 模板 編輯員 rights for yourself， please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/模板 編輯員。 Administrators do not need to request or add this user right for themselves or other administrators because it is automatically granted as part of the administrator tools package。

Guidelines for granting

The 模板 編輯員 user right is granted by administrators。 Administrators use their own discretionary assessment of an 編輯員's 模板 contribution value， as well as the following general guidelines:

Criteria for revocation

The user right can be revoked at any time by an administrator without any process or prior notice in any of the following circumstances:

1. The 編輯員 demonstrated a pattern of performing obviously controversial edits to protected 模板s without first determining consensus。
2. The 編輯員 demonstrated a pattern of failing to exercise sufficient care when editing protected 模板s， resulting in serious errors appearing on pages。
3. The 編輯員 used the permission to gain the upper hand in disputes。
4. The 編輯員 performed any blatant vandalism。
5. The 編輯員 has been inactive for 12 months。
6. The 編輯員 failed to report to an administrator after noticing unauthorized use of their account or otherwise neglected account security practices。

Additionally， the right may be removed immediately at the request of the 編輯員。

If your 模板 編輯員 right was revoked and you would like to appeal the decision， first speak to the revoking administrator。 If after such an exchange you still feel the matter is unresolved and requires outside input， or if the administrator is unresponsive， use Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard to appeal the decision。

模板 protection considerations

Note: Many high-risk 模板s are protected via full protection， as these 模板s have become very stable and seen few， if any， necessary 編輯。 模板 編輯員s cannot edit these pages， but any administrator may change the protection level for individual 模板s on request。 See the list of 模板 pages currently under "protected 模板" protection。

參見

• Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/模板編輯員， for requesting the 模板 編輯員 user right
• {{edit 模板-protected}}， for making edit requests to 模板-protected pages
  • Category:Wikipedia 模板-protected edit requests， for viewing the current open 模板-protected edit requests
  • User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable， a watchable and annotated view of the current open 模板-protected edit requests
• {{user wikipedia/模板編輯員}}， a userbox 模板 to indicate you have 模板 編輯員 permission
• {{模板 編輯員 topicon}}， an icon for the top of your user page
• Wikipedia:模板 編輯員/sandbox， primarily for testing {{PROTECTIONLEVEL}}-related 模板 code
• Wikipedia:Requests for comment/模板 編輯員 user right， the original proposal that resulted in the creation of this user right