Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress
Current alerts
August 2008
- Pure-Evil-Boy (talk • contribs • CA • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) Vandalism-only account. Indef block would be appropriate. Thank you, RyanCross (talk) 02:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Done by Creol. --TBC 03:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- 24.248.215.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - repeated vandalism of Michael Jackson after final warning.
F S M 18:21, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Done already blocked for 24h.--≈ Lights χ 18:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- 202.168.58.126 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Repeated vandalism after final warning. -- RyanCross (talk) 01:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Done, blocked by Werdan7 for one week.-- Tdxiang 04:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- SoundStageDirect (talk • contribs • CA • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) Username vio (real world company name). Please use the
{{subst:username|type=block}}
template when blocking. Microchip 20:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Done - Blocked. --TBC 20:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Wweraw05 (talk • contribs • CA • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) Added blatant advertising after final warning. Had articles deleted earlier by Gwib. F S M 19:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Done Blocked indef.--≈ Lights χ 19:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Johnson of Fear (talk • contribs • CA • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) Vandalized after final warning. -Djsasso (talk) 19:20, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Done --Gwib -(talk)- 19:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
119.234.1.27 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalised my RfA, removed oppose section. F S M 16:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Not done - Single act, never warned let alone vandalized after last warning. Vip report was filed without even bothering to revert the vandalism.. -- Creol(talk) 16:29, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- I did revert it! Its my RfA why would I not be 'bothered' revert? F S M 18:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- 121.120.172.35 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Continual creation of EN-WP copy pastes. Warned, but did not desist. Microchip 11:12, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Done - Time for a QD spree. Chenzw Talk 11:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Somewhere Out There 5 (talk • contribs • CA • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) and socks. Persistent vandal. The life of brian (talk) 09:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
70.54.8.138 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Another account of the artist [Ananny], again removing RfD tags of her own, blatant self promotion, article. If she does it again consider a block. I think someone mentioned before we should block on sight... F S M 15:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Now she has done it again.... F S M 15:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
And again, after a final warning. Please block her now. F S M 15:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked. Posting 3 times here won't make it get done any faster you know. Majorly talk 15:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- 24.29.237.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalized after final warning. -- RyanCross (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Done Cassandra talk 05:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Electronixfreex (talk • contribs • CA • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) Disruptive on Razorflame's RFA. See talk page for previous links to RFA. SPA, possible reincarnation of User:IuseRosary MindTheGap (talk) 20:48, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Assuming good faith and perhaps the editor is unfamiliar with policies such as 3RR, I've given him a final warning. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- 203.94.188.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalized after final warning. -- RyanCross (talk) 01:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- 58.172.12.83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Created nonsense pages after last warning. -- RyanCross (talk) 09:45, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Done - blocked for a week --TBC 09:46, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- 210.15.217.194 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalized after final warning on Hippopotamus. Thanks, RyanCross (talk) 04:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Done Said IP managed to hit Carl Saigon before I blocked. Cassandra talk 04:07, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- 66.159.152.156 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Continuously adding in unreferenced information into articles. Razorflame 23:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- 66.159.152.156 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Had last warning, still going on. - tholly --Turnip-- 16:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Not done - the articles created may have notability issues, but don't seem to be vandalism. --Gwib -(talk)- 17:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Even after things like this (A load of random letters, not a Japanese article name) and this? Chenzw told them they would be blocked if they put in any more text without reliable sources like this (which is almost certainly false). - tholly --Turnip-- 18:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- The following IPs below are obviously the same user, and would either need an individual block of each of them or a range block. Altogether, they have vandalized 5 times today, 6 this month. The IPs are the following:
- 210.8.54.108 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 210.8.54.106 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 210.8.54.104 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
-- RyanCross (talk) 01:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Done, with the possibility of range blocking him if he comes back using a different IP.--TBC 02:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- 216.93.231.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - repeatedly adding the "elephant population has tripled thanks to Stephen Colbert" to articles. - A Link to the Past (talk) 04:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Not done Stopped vandalizing after last warning two weeks ago, may have changed IP addresses. Cassandra talk 04:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- He just vandalized in the form of African Bush Elephant (if you'll notice, he c/ped the article with the Stephen Colbert thing there). - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Done - He gets a 24 hour break for vandalizing twice after final warning. -- Creol(talk) 05:58, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- 220.225.96.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - repeated vandalism to Gene. —Giggy 09:48, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Done - Chenzw Talk 09:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- 86.69.154.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Creating new nonsense pages, has been warned many times. - tholly --Turnip-- 09:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Will actively watch user. - Seems to have stopped. Chenzw Talk 11:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger (talk • contribs • CA • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) Utter nonsense username. Falls under the "confusing username" clause of WP:USERNAME. Razorflame 04:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- SUL username of a month old En:wp account. Given the edits (all six of them), the account is likely a second account by an experienced user. I am not certain how this name is confusing though as there are no other names it could be confused with (we have no badgers at all) although it is similar (extra badgers) to en:wp accounts which have not been used in years. I just do not see a reason to block due to username. -- Creol(talk) 04:48, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- The phrase "badger badger badger badger" comes from a well-known Flash animation. Ziggy Sawdust 05:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)