토론:핵자

Inside nucleons with PROOF

""PHYSICS BREAKTHROUGH"" Easy proof for model works over calculation of no charge not eliptic neutron radius from mass difference to proton. (all needed in WP and eternal right) Inside neutron are only shells of electron positron rotator pairs and outer rotator is defining radius. After electron away and positron in center with normal before relativistic mass it is a proton. 2 * relativistic mass-normal mass=mass difference and relativistic mass set into coulomb(+gravity) = centripetal force equation leads to radius fully right a little less than measured. Particle zoo is just other rotator systems with different shell numbers, radius and shell spins with shell gaps from el. mg. fields and outer posi-electron rotating around multiple nucleons makes strong force is a new physics model. Ask CERN about what was really prooved or calculate ! Official CERN said already that could not proove other theories. Quark theory cannot explain much always adapted not predictions with proof by measurements. Not proved also higgs fields mass, gravitron or string theory etc. Explanation of nucleon mass with quarks is not finished with asumption of many same type quark triples about 5℅ mass rest from gluon binding energy in this model every rotator has exact mass defined by radius in sum same nucleon mass. Since rotation near c like true for atomuc shell electrons the rotators are with spin like shell without attracktiion from load of shell to shell or center load positron but keeping gaps and resistance against oiter impact of neutrons etc. if too much broken into positrons same electrons and other rotator system likely most with less shells and photons+neutrinos explained by atons theory but not proved already massless load points rotators with mass only from rotation with spinner effect and with center load point same positron or electron. e-Neutrino same photon but radius alao same e not having any load to outside but mass from rotation that way most flying through nucleons with spin add. Until now in every case neutron radius derived from mass difference is a hard proof in physics not only deleting in WP kayuweboehm@yahoo.de