User contributions for Just to clarify
Appearance
A user with 373 edits. Account created on 29 September 2006.
18 September 2020
- 17:1017:10, 18 September 2020 diff hist +281 User talk:WorldOfChess →Your disruptive edits are on notice again: The relevant discussion is now archived. ~~~~ current
23 February 2020
- 21:4421:44, 23 February 2020 diff hist +3 Capablanca chess Actually, 1920s is the correct form.
19 February 2020
- 21:4021:40, 19 February 2020 diff hist +173 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Request to protect or salt article deleted at articles for deletion: Thank you
- 20:3220:32, 19 February 2020 diff hist +90 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Request to protect or salt article deleted at articles for deletion: Link to non-redirect version: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gothic_chess&redirect=no
- 20:3120:31, 19 February 2020 diff hist −39 User talk:WorldOfChess →Your disruptive edits are on notice again: Fix link to permalink to be https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=941639002
- 20:1820:18, 19 February 2020 diff hist +21 User talk:WorldOfChess →Your disruptive edits are on notice again: Make link to discussion more visible
- 20:1720:17, 19 February 2020 diff hist +366 User talk:WorldOfChess →Your disruptive edits are on notice again: Link to actual discussion
- 20:1520:15, 19 February 2020 diff hist +818 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Request to protect or salt article deleted at articles for deletion: new section
- 20:1520:15, 19 February 2020 diff hist +389 User talk:WorldOfChess →Your disruptive edits are on notice again: new section
8 February 2020
- 23:0023:00, 8 February 2020 diff hist +147 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gothic chess New York Post is questionable, see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#New_York_Post
- 22:2022:20, 8 February 2020 diff hist +27 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gothic chess Link to "legal threats": https://archive.is/HR8pt
- 20:4020:40, 8 February 2020 diff hist +285 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gothic chess '''Do not attempt to use sockpuppet accounts to stack the vote''' If a lot of keep votes come from suspiciously similar accounts, I will request a sockpuppet investigation
- 20:3120:31, 8 February 2020 diff hist +3,444 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gothic chess Delete and salt as per its limited coverage and as per the types of contentious edits this article causes
20 January 2020
- 12:2712:27, 20 January 2020 diff hist +249 Capablanca chess →Using a different board: Restore paragraph pointing to notable Grand Chess variant (See https://www.chessvariants.com/large.dir/freeling.html for list of coverage)
- 12:2412:24, 20 January 2020 diff hist +459 Capablanca chess →Using a different board: Restore Grand Chess diagram removed by disruptive editor
- 12:0512:05, 20 January 2020 diff hist +4 Endgame tablebase removing reference to redirect and replacing name with more notable Chess variant
- 12:0312:03, 20 January 2020 diff hist −33 Capablanca chess Remove link to redirect which just takes you back to this page
17 January 2020
- 06:4906:49, 17 January 2020 diff hist −4 List of chess variants →Empress or princess pieces: Gothic Chess does not have a page in the Wikipedia
13 January 2020
- 18:4018:40, 13 January 2020 diff hist −120 User:Just to clarify Sigh. The POV pushing is back, after a 11-year hiatus. current
- 18:1018:10, 13 January 2020 diff hist −78 User:WorldOfChess Undid revision 932760564 by WorldOfChess (talk) Remove promotional content current Tag: Undo
20 October 2018
- 13:2113:21, 20 October 2018 diff hist 0 Capablanca chess →Postdating Capablanca Chess: The Gothic Chess patent (which expired in 2006 for non-payment) was filed in 2001. 1998 Gothic Chess used a different opening setup.
18 October 2018
- 16:5016:50, 18 October 2018 diff hist −6 Capablanca chess Uncomment diagram showing eight different proposed 8x10 setups
17 October 2018
- 12:1612:16, 17 October 2018 diff hist −22 Alexis Skye Removing link to no longer existing Ed Trice article; making image one of just Alexis Skye
- 06:0606:06, 17 October 2018 diff hist −49 Wikipedia:WikiProject Chess/Index of chess articles →G: Remove deleted article and Gothic Chess redirect
- 05:5905:59, 17 October 2018 diff hist +30,898 N Talk:Embassy Chess/Archive 1 Archive ancient Gothic Chess heated discussion current
- 05:5805:58, 17 October 2018 diff hist −30,866 Talk:Embassy chess No new discussion in 11 years. Archive. Tag: Replaced
- 00:4100:41, 17 October 2018 diff hist −4 ChessV →Competitions: Remove Gothic Chess link, since article is now a redirect
- 00:3700:37, 17 October 2018 diff hist −19 Outline of chess →Variants with bishop+knight and rook+knight compounds: Gothic Chess is now a redirect
- 00:3600:36, 17 October 2018 diff hist +14 Capablanca random chess →Rules: Remove Gothic Chess, since that article is now a redirect back to Capablanca Chess
- 00:3300:33, 17 October 2018 diff hist −19 José Raúl Capablanca Gothic Chess is now a redirect
- 00:3100:31, 17 October 2018 diff hist −18 Embassy chess Gothic Chess is now a redirect
7 April 2018
- 17:4417:44, 7 April 2018 diff hist −29 Talk:My 60 Memorable Games Use {{archives|auto=long}} to show pointer to archive 1
- 17:3817:38, 7 April 2018 diff hist −2,171 Talk:Ed Trice Moved to Talk:Ed_Trice/Archive_3
- 17:3717:37, 7 April 2018 diff hist +2,169 N Talk:Ed Trice/Archive 3 This content is nearly a decade old; archive current
24 December 2015
- 17:3817:38, 24 December 2015 diff hist +549 User talk:Rhododendrites/Chaney →Found the title card image: Adding archived comparison and commentary
- 05:5805:58, 24 December 2015 diff hist +563 User talk:Rhododendrites/Chaney →Reasons to think Magic Mansion is a hoax: Also, the article claimed Magic mansion was recorded on to U-Matic, but was supposedly canceled a year before U-matic existed
10 October 2015
- 18:5818:58, 10 October 2015 diff hist +82 James Burke (gangster) →"Jimmy the Gent": This shocking fact used to be referenced, restoring ref
10 March 2014
- 09:2609:26, 10 March 2014 diff hist −23,856 Talk:My 60 Memorable Games Archiving discussion (it's 100% about "My 61 Memorable Games")
- 09:2509:25, 10 March 2014 diff hist +23,906 N Talk:My 60 Memorable Games/Archive 1 Archiving discussion (it's 100% about "My 61 Memorable Games") current
- 02:2102:21, 10 March 2014 diff hist +1 m User talk:Faranan2030 format fix
- 02:2002:20, 10 March 2014 diff hist +881 N User talk:Faranan2030 WP:COI warning
- 02:0902:09, 10 March 2014 diff hist +245 Talk:My 60 Memorable Games →Is chess.com a reliable source?: With the icelandic newspaper article, there is no need for chess.com as a source
- 02:0702:07, 10 March 2014 diff hist −227 Talk:My 60 Memorable Games →Is chess.com a reliable source?: ~~~~
- 02:0002:00, 10 March 2014 diff hist +5 My 60 Memorable Games →My 61 Memorable Games: It's a hoax as recorded in WP:RS, so let's call it that
- 01:5801:58, 10 March 2014 diff hist +55 My 60 Memorable Games Bók sem var sögð eftir Fischer boðin á eBay is the article's title
- 01:5701:57, 10 March 2014 diff hist +307 My 60 Memorable Games Found a WP:RS stating the book is a hoax. Case closed.
- 01:5001:50, 10 March 2014 diff hist +363 Talk:My 60 Memorable Games http://www.mbl.is/folk/frettir/2007/12/18/bok_sem_var_sogd_eftir_fischer_bodin_a_ebay/ no need to use chess.com (and no need to name the alleged culprit)
- 01:4101:41, 10 March 2014 diff hist +538 Talk:My 60 Memorable Games →Is chess.com a reliable source?: Looks like articles are controlled by the editors of the site
9 March 2014
- 22:5222:52, 9 March 2014 diff hist +590 Talk:My 60 Memorable Games →Is chess.com a reliable source?: new section
- 22:4122:41, 9 March 2014 diff hist −9 My 60 Memorable Games →My 61 Memorable Games: Clean up wording