User contributions for D1d2d3d29
Results for D1d2d3d29 talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 661 edits. Account created on 30 August 2023.
8 June 2025
- 13:5613:56, 8 June 2025 diff hist +66 Panzerhaubitze 2000 →Russian invasion of Ukraine: Updated the part using oryx as a source
30 May 2025
- 15:0915:09, 30 May 2025 diff hist +233 Talk:Kursk offensive (2024–2025) →Why is the casualties section of this article so... incoherent?: Reply Tag: Reply
27 May 2025
- 14:1614:16, 27 May 2025 diff hist +182 Talk:Kursk offensive (2024–2025) →Why is the casualties section of this article so... incoherent?: Reply Tag: Reply
25 May 2025
- 21:0021:00, 25 May 2025 diff hist +276 Talk:Kursk offensive (2024–2025) →Make it a Pyrrhic victory?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:5820:58, 25 May 2025 diff hist +320 Talk:Kursk offensive (2024–2025) →Why is the casualties section of this article so... incoherent?: new section Tag: New topic
- 20:4820:48, 25 May 2025 diff hist −4 m Chengdu J-10 →Pakistan: Pakistan claimed to have shot down 3 rafales, an SU-30 and a MiG-29, not to have shot down 3 rafales, an SU-30 and a mirage 2000. Pakistan does appear to have shot down a mirage 2000, but they probably misreported it as a rafale, not a MiG-29, one of which was shot down
11 May 2025
- 21:2521:25, 11 May 2025 diff hist +66 Chengdu J-10 →Pakistan
- 21:2321:23, 11 May 2025 diff hist −653 Dassault Rafale →Indian Air Force: The flight global article only addresses the images of the shot down tail section, and doesn't even mention other proof like the remains of an M88 engine or anonymous US and French officials from the Reuters report or reports about hospitalized pilots from local sources. Putting it into here like it's seriously disputing the shot down of the rafale when it only addresses one photo is misleading, just says that it disputes the BS001 serial number claim and that's it
- 21:1921:19, 11 May 2025 diff hist +412 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →Neutral Sources: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:0513:05, 11 May 2025 diff hist +42 Chengdu J-10 →Pakistan Tag: Reverted
- 13:0213:02, 11 May 2025 diff hist +24 Dassault Mirage 2000 →India: Fixed a typo and added mentions of the washington post
- 13:0013:00, 11 May 2025 diff hist −79 Template:2025 India–Pakistan conflict infobox Removed a double counting, the washington post article reffering to the shot down rafale and mirage 2000 is already included
10 May 2025
- 18:0818:08, 10 May 2025 diff hist +40 Chengdu J-10 →Pakistan: Added a mention of a rafale
- 18:0518:05, 10 May 2025 diff hist +201 User talk:D1d2d3d29 →May 2025: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:5516:55, 10 May 2025 diff hist +419 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →Just so you will know: new section Tag: New topic
- 16:3716:37, 10 May 2025 diff hist +368 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan crisis →Someone should make this articles table more similar to this table: new section Tag: New topic
- 16:3116:31, 10 May 2025 diff hist +42 Chengdu J-10 →Pakistan: Elaborated in the operational history section Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 16:1716:17, 10 May 2025 diff hist +247 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →Has this been added to the table and article yet?: new section Tag: New topic
- 16:1216:12, 10 May 2025 diff hist +15 Template:2025 India–Pakistan conflict infobox Since both Reuters and Washington post now seem to agree that there were 3 crash sites in India with 3 hospitalized pilots, i am changing it from "2-3" to "3", also changing it from "shot down" to a more ambigous "lost" since another editor said that we don't necesarilly know that they were all lost to Pakistani fire
- 16:1016:10, 10 May 2025 diff hist +234 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →This should be added to third part claims: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:5015:50, 10 May 2025 diff hist +226 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →Neutral Sources: Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:2811:28, 10 May 2025 diff hist +183 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →Should this part of the article be changed?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:0311:03, 10 May 2025 diff hist +212 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →Should this part of the article be changed?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:5710:57, 10 May 2025 diff hist −2 m Dassault Mirage 2000 →India: Fixed a typo
- 10:5610:56, 10 May 2025 diff hist +460 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →Should this part of the article be changed?: new section Tag: New topic
- 09:3009:30, 10 May 2025 diff hist +364 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →Neutral Sources: Reply Tag: Reply
- 09:2309:23, 10 May 2025 diff hist +54 2025 India–Pakistan conflict →7 May: Elaborated on the washington post claims "The Post identified an apparent third crash site in Akhnoor, in Indian-administered Kashmir, based on videos and news reports from the day, but it was not possible to determine what type of aircraft was in the wreckage from the available visuals."
- 09:2009:20, 10 May 2025 diff hist +358 Dassault Mirage 2000 →India: Added a bit on operation Sindoor usage
- 09:1509:15, 10 May 2025 diff hist +684 2025 India–Pakistan conflict →7 May: Added a little bit more to the may 7th section
- 09:0509:05, 10 May 2025 diff hist +238 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →On the aircraft shot down on may 7th: Reply Tag: Reply
- 09:0309:03, 10 May 2025 diff hist +901 User talk:D1d2d3d29 →WP:NOTFORUM: Reply Tag: Reply
9 May 2025
- 18:5618:56, 9 May 2025 diff hist +23 m Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →On the aircraft shot down on may 7th
- 18:5518:55, 9 May 2025 diff hist +2,809 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →On the aircraft shot down on may 7th: new section Tag: New topic
- 18:4218:42, 9 May 2025 diff hist +148 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →On the casualties table: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:3218:32, 9 May 2025 diff hist +186 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →On the casualties table: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:2018:20, 9 May 2025 diff hist +212 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →On the casualties table: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:1318:13, 9 May 2025 diff hist −366 Dassault Rafale →Indian Air Force: Removed a bad sentence, first of all, what is "Global flight researchers"? Like what does that even mean? Second, that article only claims to debunk the photos showing the shot down rafale tail, but there is evidence besides that, no? What about photos of the crashed M88 engine? I don't think the article even mentions that
- 17:5517:55, 9 May 2025 diff hist +1,612 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →On the casualties table: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:4917:49, 9 May 2025 diff hist +284 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →On the casualties table: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:2517:25, 9 May 2025 diff hist +862 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →On the casualties table: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:0917:09, 9 May 2025 diff hist +347 Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict →On the casualties table: new section Tag: New topic
- 16:4916:49, 9 May 2025 diff hist 0 m Dassault Rafale →Indian Air Force: Changed "unnamed US officials" to "Anonymous US officials", also corrected a typo
- 16:4616:46, 9 May 2025 diff hist +4 2025 India–Pakistan conflict →7 May: specified which fighter jets Pakistan claimed to have shot down
- 16:4016:40, 9 May 2025 diff hist +2 m 2025 India–Pakistan conflict →7 May: Changed J-10 to J-10CE
- 16:3916:39, 9 May 2025 diff hist +275 2025 India–Pakistan conflict →7 May: Added a bit on Brahmos missile usage, more sources will be added later.
8 May 2025
- 20:3320:33, 8 May 2025 diff hist +4 m Chengdu J-10 →Pakistan: Added a link
- 16:2216:22, 8 May 2025 diff hist +31 m 2025 India–Pakistan conflict Added a bit to the casualties section
- 16:1916:19, 8 May 2025 diff hist +19 m 2025 India–Pakistan conflict →7 May: Fixed a typo
- 16:1816:18, 8 May 2025 diff hist −490 m 2025 India–Pakistan conflict →8 May: Why are you putting this into may 8th when this is talking about a may 7th event?
- 16:1816:18, 8 May 2025 diff hist +515 2025 India–Pakistan conflict →7 May: Added the reuters claims to the may 7th section
