User contributions for ChessFiends

13 May 2025

• 10:2510:25, 13 May 2025 diff hist −52 Messier 92 That's older than the age of the universe, so cannot be correct.

10 May 2025

• 22:1922:19, 10 May 2025 diff hist 0 Timeline of natural history was placed in the wrong section current
• 17:2917:29, 10 May 2025 diff hist 0 Timeline of natural history was placed in the wrong section

3 May 2025

• 14:0514:05, 3 May 2025 diff hist −69 Timeline of natural history →Tonian Period: remove duplicated entry

1 May 2025

• 11:0211:02, 1 May 2025 diff hist −277 Timeline of natural history →Statherian Period: removing duplicated entry

28 April 2025

• 18:2118:21, 28 April 2025 diff hist −1 m Timeline of natural history →Neoarchean Era: fixing a typo

23 April 2025

• 11:3111:31, 23 April 2025 diff hist 0 SMSS J031300.36−670839.3 it is 200M, after 100M years reionization had only just begun, and the universe is thought to be 13.8bn years old (so to claim it's been shining for 13.6bn years and be 100M years old suggests the universe is 13.7bn years old). current

28 January 2025

• 09:0309:03, 28 January 2025 diff hist −9 Thunderf00t Undid revision 1271890953 by MagicatthemovieS (talk) see discussion page Tag: Undo

5 November 2024

• 21:1821:18, 5 November 2024 diff hist +486 Talk:Thunderf00t →Picture

31 October 2024

• 07:2507:25, 31 October 2024 diff hist −11 Middle East Eye it is, not "reportedly".

25 September 2024

• 08:5308:53, 25 September 2024 diff hist +450 Middle East Eye Undid revision 1247631099 by Hatman31 (talk) this is referenced and relevant. Tag: Undo

5 June 2024

• 15:0115:01, 5 June 2024 diff hist +146 User talk:ChessFiends →Douglas Murray
• 14:5714:57, 5 June 2024 diff hist +336 Talk:Douglas Murray (author) →critics have associated his views with Islamophobia??
• 14:4714:47, 5 June 2024 diff hist −1,302 Douglas Murray (author) Undid revision 1227404735 by Jonathan A Jones (talk) Those are both the articles that I have just reviewed. Neither state that he is Islamophobic. You'll have to go check yourself. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 14:4614:46, 5 June 2024 diff hist +893 User talk:ChessFiends →Douglas Murray
• 14:4014:40, 5 June 2024 diff hist −1,302 Douglas Murray (author) Undid revision 1227404009 by Firefangledfeathers (talk) I am not mistaken, thank you, the articles are here https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01419870.2020.1749688 and here https://www.academia.edu/11653451/Beyond_Islamophobia_The_Role_of_Englishness_and_English_National_Identity_within_English_Defence_League_discourse_and_politics Tags: Undo Reverted
• 14:3914:39, 5 June 2024 diff hist +1,075 Talk:Douglas Murray (author) →critics have associated his views with Islamophobia??
• 14:3714:37, 5 June 2024 diff hist −39 m Douglas Murray (author) →Political views Tag: Reverted
• 14:3214:32, 5 June 2024 diff hist −547 Douglas Murray (author) christ, wikipedia has fallen so far, just created an account on academia.edu to verify, and this article does not mention Murray once... I wonder how many of these are going to be fake... Tag: Reverted
• 14:2014:20, 5 June 2024 diff hist −716 Douglas Murray (author) This paper does not call Murray Islamophobic... the quote "Important Islamophobic intellectuals are..." does not appear in the piece. The real quote is "but extemporizations on her basic theme can be found in the work of many conservative writers during the late 2000s and 2010s, such as"... Tag: Reverted
• 00:0900:09, 5 June 2024 diff hist −2 Douglas Murray (author) Undid revision 1227273750 by Cambial Yellowing (talk) That it is academics who criticize him is unsourced. By definition those who criticize him are "his critics". This is not a good change. Tag: Undo

16 April 2024

• 11:4511:45, 16 April 2024 diff hist −73 Go woke, go broke Undid revision 1219159530 by Nice Stories (talk) undoing good faith edits, the critical sucess of the movies is not important to the topic, and the use of grammar was wrong.
• 02:2602:26, 16 April 2024 diff hist −3,797 The North Face undoing good faith edits by Breadman10, paragraphs largely read as advertisement for the company. Tag: Manual revert

13 April 2024

• 22:4022:40, 13 April 2024 diff hist −87 Mortimer Wheeler several reasons not to include this: 1. we say he was "often criticized" for these things but in his time it appears he was not? perhaps he should have been but... 2: there isn't anything in the body of the article about harassment (accounts of dating his colleagues =/ harassment), 3. the accounts of his groping are unsubstantiated so we should at very least say "alleged", this presents it as if it's a fact: "criticized for bullying and sexually harassing..."
• 14:2914:29, 13 April 2024 diff hist −108 m The Nameless One (character) →References: removing deleted cats Tag: Reverted
• 14:2614:26, 13 April 2024 diff hist +1 The Nameless One (character) No edit summary Tag: Reverted
• 14:1614:16, 13 April 2024 diff hist +23,017 The Nameless One (character) Undid revision 1195681703 by Kung Fu Man (talk) article was deleted without a proposal to delete or merge content Tags: Removed redirect Undo Reverted

12 April 2024

• 22:1322:13, 12 April 2024 diff hist +529 Douglas Murray (author) Undid revision 1218631945 by Hemiauchenia (talk) Including both the voices of his critics and his defenders is the very foundation of WP:DUE. What is undue weight is including a large list of criticisms and accusations in his lede in a way that presents it as if it's a consensus.. Tag: Undo
• 19:4319:43, 12 April 2024 diff hist +757 Middle East Eye No edit summary
• 18:2118:21, 12 April 2024 diff hist +543 Douglas Murray (author) this is not a general consensus, but primarily a criticism levied against him by his political adversaries. If we say "is associated with" we need to say by who. And since this is not a clear consensus, we need to make clear that this is a disputed topic.
• 15:5215:52, 12 April 2024 diff hist −64 Ghassan Hage removing unreferenced speculation about cause of his deafness
• 15:4815:48, 12 April 2024 diff hist −468 Ghassan Hage →Contributions: vast number of problems in this section, use of Wikipedia's voice to make the claims of the subject (ie. "highlights the importance of including the permanent processes...", "that became prominent", "an invitation to see racial/colonial", "highlights the critical anthropological task..."), also claims to a work being influential or being his "most important contribution to anthropology" would need to be referenced specifically.
• 15:2715:27, 12 April 2024 diff hist −361 Abdelmalek Sayad removing duplicated translations from bibliography and organizing by date, removing some more imperious claims to greatness from the lede (ie: "central to", "expert of the North-African community"), add back if there is a ref to support it.
• 15:1115:11, 12 April 2024 diff hist −514 Abdelmalek Sayad →Sociology: a vast number of problems with this section, "double prism" is a nonsense term, much of it is written in Wikipedia's voice where it should be in the voice of the subject (ie "examined the difficult situation of migrants... forced into silence"), there would need to be a reference for the claim that he "renewed the approach of French sociology". Also claims to "importance" are so common through sociology articles that each ought to require a ref, and the last ref wasn't genuine.

10 April 2024

• 16:4216:42, 10 April 2024 diff hist +22 Benjamin Bok updating peak ranking

5 April 2024

• 12:5912:59, 5 April 2024 diff hist +715 Talk:Go woke, go broke →Bias?

25 March 2024

• 14:4414:44, 25 March 2024 diff hist −257 Bauhaus Undid revision 1215489337 by AI Editor72 (talk) Tag: Undo
• 14:4314:43, 25 March 2024 diff hist −238 Chess.com Undid revision 1215491550 by AI Editor72 (talk) Tag: Undo
• 09:5009:50, 25 March 2024 diff hist −199 Go woke, go broke "challenging the term's validity" is not neutral, that Barbie did well is a fact, how to interpret that fact should be up to the reader. likewise "challenged the premise of the slogan" is not neutral. "The phrase has seen mixed levels of success and applicability" is not exactly the right way to interpret the various analysis of it; analysts are not sure of the real impact, but that doesn't mean it's had "mixed success".
• 06:1306:13, 25 March 2024 diff hist +1,908 The North Face adding recent Allyship in the Outdoors program

24 March 2024

• 10:4010:40, 24 March 2024 diff hist −10 Bill Burr Bill Burr is not a producer. He has been an executive producer on a few projects, which is not the same thing as a producer, nor is it his profession.
• 10:2110:21, 24 March 2024 diff hist +25 Ghostface Killah →Lawsuits and criminal charges: fixing a mistake in charges
• 10:1710:17, 24 March 2024 diff hist 0 m Ghostface Killah →Lawsuits and Criminal Charges
• 10:1610:16, 24 March 2024 diff hist +1,708 Ghostface Killah →Lawsuits: adding arrests
• 08:3608:36, 24 March 2024 diff hist +387 Haiti →Caracol Industrial Park
• 08:2508:25, 24 March 2024 diff hist +2 m Haiti →Caracol Industrial Park
• 08:2508:25, 24 March 2024 diff hist +1,623 Haiti →Caracol Industrial Park: completely re-writing this segment to reflect the reality today, this read as an advertisement for the Park, yet it in fact never materialized and failed the local Haitians that were displaced as a result of it!

17 March 2024

• 23:4623:46, 17 March 2024 diff hist −29 Template:Manosphere no clear ties to the term.
• 23:4123:41, 17 March 2024 diff hist −105 Thunderf00t why are these here? nothing in the references for ties to "manosphere". He also was not part of the GamerGate controversy, making a video criticizing Sarkeesian surely doesn't qualify.

8 March 2024

• 01:3601:36, 8 March 2024 diff hist +17 Douglas Murray (author) moving this from a statement about the subject to a statement made by others about the subject, as is the genuine context in the references. Tag: Reverted