Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Example cruft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Guideline?

I am pretty much sure that example cruft plagues many articles. Does it make sense to expand it into a formal guideline? See Talk:Streisand effect Staszek Lem (talk) 16:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These already is a guideline section on this at WP:SPAMBAIT Krushia (talk) 22:19, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Krushia (and Staszek Lem), WP:SPAMBAIT is not "a guideline section on this". That's obviously about spam, a different problem. The two are at best indirectly linked (often through fancruft). See e.g. the 440 examples at Sobriquet#Examples. ◄ Sebastian 16:52, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to say something about not turning examples into images.

It says nowhere here that so many examples may not (which is true) be mostly/all in one image, which stupefied me, so do not let this deceive others by adding more information which concerns that topic. Gamingforfun365 (talk) 03:26, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this is an opinion essay, not a guideline or policy. And adding something like that kinda falls into the WP:Beans category. This essay doesn't seem to have that many references from my quick search of talk pages linking here turns up less than 500; you might want to check out the MOS:TRIVIA guideline which covers some of the same issues. PaleAqua (talk) 03:56, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No examples?

This needs to have an example section, with links to diffs... preferably an unreasonably long section with too many examples. jp×g 05:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]