Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2010/February

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.


Proposals, February 2010

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

If (after approval) you create a stub type, please be sure to add it to the list of stub types. This page will be archived in its entirety once all discussions have been closed; there is no need to move them to another page.

NEW PROPOSALS

split of Category:Algeria geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently oversized however the following four upmerged templates have 60+ articles, speedy the cats

Waacstats (talk) 18:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Support speedying Nearly 1,400 articles is WAY oversized.--TM 18:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More fish stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Having reduced the Category:Cypriniformes stubs from 2660 we know have a similar problem with one of its new subcats Category:Cyprinidae stubs with 1700+ articles. I propose the following which catscan says will have 60 articles or more

then lets see whats left. Waacstats (talk) 09:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC) Support ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 11:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More magazine templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Still trying to tame the magazine beast. I would like to create the following templates, with possible categories to follow, if the size allows:

Dawynn (talk) 12:37, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Norwegian historian stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
To be made form upmerged template {{norway-historian-stub}}. 75 articles. Dawynn (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Support. Waacstats (talk) 20:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Punjab (Pakistan) geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Above category is oversized, we already have upmerged templates for districts and it seems that the following is viable.

and if anyone can find a handful of extra stubs to push Lahore or Gujarat over the 60 barrier we could take this down even further. Waacstats (talk) 23:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC) Make it Category:Jhelum district geography stubs and I'll, support. Oh no... These stubs are dangerous. They attract all sorts of ips who will add the list of local taxi drivers and say "Famous person". Grrrr ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 14:59, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Thats why I just sort them. Waacstats (talk) 20:59, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Fish stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Slightly oversized at over 1000 articles, I propose the following

Waacstats (talk) 22:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Cypriniformes stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Slightly oversized at over 2600 articles, I propose the following

categories only if the templates pass 60 articles. Waacstats (talk) 22:43, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Freestyle skiing biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Catscan gives over 100 articles for which {{Freestyle-skiing-bio-stub}} would be appropriate. Waacstats (talk) 19:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Support, speedy. Gosox(55)(55) 19:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:American poet stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose splitting this category into Category:American poet, 19th century birth stubs and Category:American poet, 20th century birth stubs.

Templates redirecting to 19th Century would be:
And to the twentieth century:

I know that 1950s is very close to being able to create a sub-category, with 57, but i don't think anything else even close yet. Modeled after the American Novelist stubs. Gosox(55)(55) 19:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Support split. Waacstats (talk) 22:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Support ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 14:59, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{US-crime-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
There's a stub for every state (as of now all are stubs) and there are many more articles in the category that could fall under this template.Gosox(55)(55) 17:55, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

A reasonable stub that would also be a useful home for Category:United States crime biography stubs and possibly others. Waacstats (talk) 22:36, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Support. I've seen the stubs too, Awful. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 15:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

split of Category:Submarine stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Looks like 300+ articles could take the following

and at least 60 could take

Waacstats (talk) 15:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Support and speedy (at least for Germany).Gosox(55)(55) 17:56, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

final split of brazil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have all bar 2 states split from Category:Brazil geography stubs given that the two remaining states have templates with more than 60 articles I propose we speedy

Waacstats (talk) 10:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC) Speedy ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 11:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

split of Category:Tortricidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
oversized category, looks like the information is available to split by subfamily, should hopefully produce three smaller categories

Waacstats (talk) 09:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC) Support ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 11:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Physics stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose {{Spectroscopy-stub}} which would of course be a subcategory of Category:Physics-stub There are 90 stub articles listed at Article lists for Spectroscopy stubs. "Category:Spectroscopy articles by quality" has the number at 90 for stub articles in this category. During the normal course of my editing with the AWB bot I come across articles that I would rather classify as a Spectroscopy stub rather than simply a Physics stub. Physics stub is really too broad of a category for this set of articles. Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 04:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Looks like a good way of splitting an oversize cat.Waacstats (talk) 09:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for noting Category:Physics-stub is an oversized category. I think that is what I was trying to say in so many words. As the one who proposed this I meant that the {{Spectroscopy-stub}} should be a stub within the "Physics-stub" category so I changed the title of this section. Sorry, I have never done this before. At the moment I don't see any subcategory beneath {{Spectroscopy-stub}} - I just wanted to be clear on that. If a subcategory seems to be needed I can propose that too, I suppose. Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 02:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New software stub categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
As I'm sorting the software stubs, I keep running into these four categories that I haven't really found another good location for.

Dawynn (talk) 11:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Can't see anything wrong with any of that supoprt templates categoreis if they make the 60 mark. Waacstats (talk) 09:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Support per Waacstats. Gosox(55)(55) 18:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{India-festival-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Would seem to make sense given the thousands of Indian festivals... ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 13:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

I know there are thousands of festivals in India so if we get 60+ articles then would support a category along the lines of Category:Indian festival stubs?

Waacstats (talk) 12:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Nanotechnology stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Created from existing upmerged template {{nano-tech-stub}}. Relates to existing category Category:Nanotechnology. 87 articles -- and helps to subcategorize the very large category Category:Technology stubs. Dawynn (talk) 13:26, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Nice to see a split of the technology stubs, SUpport Waacstats (talk) 12:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Magazine Stubs (again)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Still trying to break down Category:Magazine stubs and Category:Cultural magazine stubs into decent sized categories. I'd like to propose the following:

Dawynn (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Looks like a good idea, same as before if the templates reach 60 then I support the categories, however I would suggest three name changes to the templates, I don't think we want a stub template for magazines about buses so I suggest changing bus-mag-stub to {{Business-mag-stub}}, I think we generally use compu not comp so change comp-mag-stub to {{Compu-mag-stub}} and I don't think that the ents of middle earth have many magazines so change ent-mag-stub to {[tl|Entertainment-mag-stub}}. Waacstats (talk) 12:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Just a correction to make sure this shows up in searches. That should be {{Entertainment-mag-stub}} (corrected the brackets) Dawynn (talk) 17:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{Cairo-district-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
Look up this Category: Category:Districts of Cairo; more than 30+ articles are present in very short length and only with Egypt-stub. I guess it is quite reasonable to create a stub collecting these articles about districts of Cairo. Thanks. Mohamed Magdy (talk) 21:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Oppose Category:Egypt geography stubs has around 220 articles in it, which is not enough to force a split. Also, we sort by geographic subdivision, so sorting by governate is the better option. --TM 14:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Oppose ALso as far as I'm aware there are never likely to be 60 articles on districts of Cairo. I only support templates which I think at one time will easily surpass 60. Also 220 geo stubs is very low. Sometime in the future I may support a {{Cairo-stub}} if we have well over 60 stubs specifically related to Cairo. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 11:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{Italy-theatre-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Should be hundreds of theatres to transwiki. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 15:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Support, absolutely. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Iguana/Chameleon Stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
96.255.71.164 (talk) 00:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC) Found about 60 articles

Oppose for now. I don't really dabble much in zoology or biology. I looked up Category:Iguanidae and Category:Chameleons. Each of these categories is pretty small to begin with, and I didn't see any immediate connection between the two (except for being Category:Lizards, which already has its own category for Category:Lizard stubs). If you can suggest a better succinct category name, I'd reconsider. Dawynn (talk) 14:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{Cuba-painter-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
At the moment there are enough, I think, for at least a tag to be created. I'm going to hopefully be working on them some over the next few days, and with luck I can get enough to warrant a category. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Support. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 15:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Storage software stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

Would like this new category to support Category:Software stubs that relate to computer storage software. This would include software for data compression, for backup and disaster recovery. Dawynn (talk) 20:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Magazine stub templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I haven't explored yet to see how many stubs would apply, but would like to propose the following upmerged templates for this purpose. Each of these would upmerge to Category:Magazine stubs (an overpopulated category) until they have been filled out:

Dawynn (talk) 19:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Update: Did a quick scan. Numbers may be a bit off once sorting begins. But, here's what I show for cross-category scans. Note, the listed magazines typically tend to be either in general category "Magazine stubs" or in the also gigantic subcategory "Cultural magazine stubs":

  • Sports magazine stubs -- about 91 articles.
  • Religious magazine stubs -- about 58 articles.
  • Political magazine stubs -- about 115 articles.
  • Music magazine stubs -- about 63 articles.

Dawynn (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Looks like a really good idea, support all 4 templates and categories for all that pass 60 (I'm sure a couple of religious magazines can be found hiding somewhere. Waacstats (talk) 09:06, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Support. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 15:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Indian hospital stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Create {{India-hospital-stub}}. About 40 of the articles in Category:Asian hospital stubs are in India. If that isn't enough for a new category, then upmerge to Category:Asian hospital stubs and Category:Indian building and structure stubs Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:55, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

As below support template, caegory iff we get 60 articles. Waacstats (talk) 23:05, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Pakistan hospital stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Create {{Pakistan-hospital-stub}}. About 15 of the articles in Category:Asian hospital stubs are in Pakistan. If that isn't enough for a new category, then upmerge to Category:Asian hospital stubs and Category:Pakistani building and structure stubs Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:55, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Support template, category if it can be used on 60 articles. Waacstats (talk) 23:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Support. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 15:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:People's Republic of China hospital stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
Upmerged template {{PRChina-hospital-stub}} has 25 articles. Category:Asian hospital stubs currently has 187 articles, including these. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:55, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

We normally only split out upmerged templates when they reach 60 articles so leave upmerged unless it can be brought upto 60. Waacstats (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Running back, 1900s birth stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Upmerged template {{Runningback-1900s-stub}} has more than 60 articles, propose speedy creation and the rename of Category:Running back, pre-1910 birth stubs be renamed to Category:Running back, pre-1900 stubs. Waacstats (talk) 18:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:French organisation stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Upmerged template {{France-org-stub}} has more than 60 articles, propose speedy creation. Waacstats (talk) 18:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:European painter stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Both the following are viable based on the currently upmerged templates

Category:Hungarian painter stubs / {{Hungary-painter-stub}}
Category:Norwegian painter stubs / {{Norway-painter-stub}}

Waacstats (talk) 23:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Indonesian sports venue stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We already have upmerged template {{Indonesia-sports-venue-stub}} used on over 60 stubs anyone against the category. Waacstats (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

split of Category:European judo biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
both the following are viable from upmerged templates

any objections to speedy creating these. Waacstats (talk) 23:03, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Methodist stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Upmerged template exists {{methodist-stub}}. I've identified over 30 articles that could go under this category alone, not to mention well over 60 that already exist in sub-category Category:Methodist bishop stubs. There is an interested work group also (Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Methodism work group) Dawynn (talk) 13:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Update: Currently at 70 identified articles. So, speedy creation could come into play here. Dawynn (talk) 11:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Looks like a good one. Waacstats (talk) 22:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2010/February&oldid=1142556692"