Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VoiceEncoder/Archive
VoiceEncoder
VoiceEncoder (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
22 January 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- AnalogVocoder1 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
VoiceEncoder was blocked as a spam account. AnalogVocoder1 is adding links to the same material, and has the same uncivil style of editing, calling other editors "ass" ([1],[2],[3],[4]), just as VoiceEncoder did. The prior contributions may be too old/stale for Checkuser, but on behavioural grounds, this one is an obvious WP:DUCK situation, in my opinion. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Check declined by a checkuser The old account is
Stale but CU isn't necessary - this one is quacking loudly. WilliamH (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Administrator note Yeah, that's pretty obvious. Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
30 January 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Gamilo7 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Exact same pattern of edits as before on Cylon (1978), Vocoder, and Trans (album), citing original research to dubious reference. MikeWazowski (talk) 03:03, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
It's Possible the two are related. Behavior will be a better indicator here. TNXMan 03:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yep, i'd say its the same. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 01:27, 31 January 2012 (UTC)