Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Shane91c

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.


  • Supporting evidence: Possible Sock Puppet used by Shane91c. This User has Resently Vandalised using Scurless and the account is now blocked for 1 month. I know Shane91c in person and belive that shane91c might be a "Good hand, bad hand" account. I know shane91c's full name and both account names seem strangly the similar to his real name. Arctic Fox 21:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Scurless's edits seem to be targeting Arctic Fox. -- lucasbfr talk 09:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Both accounts Edits are targeting my user. Arctic Fox 15:24, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Additional information needed. Could you provide some diffs of the two accounts attacking your account? [[Sam Korn]] (smoddy) 00:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I Will get round to finding the Difs When i get back from college. Bit busy at the moment. Please don't close the case yet. Arctic Fox 10:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Scurless Difs, [1] Scurless states "elliott" which is obviously my name. Another Dif, [2]
Shane91c Difs, [3] Shane91c States again "elliott". But with a different name. How in all honestly can these two accounts not be related if they both in there edits state my name. [4]. Thanks for looking into this. Arctic Fox 14:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very highly  Likely to be related. [[Sam Korn]] (smoddy) 15:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: indefed Scurless, blocked Shane91c for a week. -- lucasbfr talk 10:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking into this. Arctic Fox 11:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]