Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Updatebot
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was
Request Expired.
Operator: Simple_Man
Automatic or Manually Assisted:Manually
Programming Language(s):AWB.
Function Summary:Updating out of date articles
Edit period(s)daily
Edit rate requested: 15 edits per TIME
Already has a bot flag (N):no
Function Details: Updates an out of date article, or removes a false article.
Discussion
Umm, how often do you want to edit it, 15 edits a min is a little fast to say the least. I'm not quite sure what you want to do here.. can you go into more details please -- Tawker 03:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- "15 edits per TIME", I'd say thats 15 edits per day, which is next to nothing -- Peppery 03:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The bot needs a userpage to explain what it's doing, with the {{bot}} template on it so it can be blocked in an emergency.
- The function details don't give enough information as to what it's doing; which articles is it updating; which articles is it removing and how (users need an admin bit to delete articles and that's unlikely to be granted to a bot.
- UpdateBot (talk · contribs) doesn't actually exist. This BRFA subpage was created by Updatebot (talk · contribs) (note the capitalisation); please decide which bot account you're using.
- The bot's owner should demonstrate that they do in fact own the bot (one edit to this BRFA page would be enough); otherwise it's impossible to tell whether the person who the bot claims is running it is actually running it. --ais523 08:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- I may have to archive this one if no more info is given.Voice-of-All 05:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Request Expired.. — xaosflux Talk 01:52, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.