Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Source Protection Committees

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source Protection Committees

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The longest unchanged article after User:Giraffedata's "comprised of" fix, done on 23 February 2009. Oh, and Source Protection Committees are completely unimportant civic committees to discuss clean water in Ontario, Canada. Mnnlaxer (talk) 04:18, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This shows the page where I found out Source Protection Committees was the longest unchanged page since Giraffedata made his trademark edit. You will just have to trust me it said "current" at the time I saw it. But you can go back in time over Giraffedata's contributions and you won't find any older edits that are still current, besides some user pages he was practicing on in the beginning. An additional interesting note is that after Giraffedata changed "who are comprised of" to ", with", he made an actual substantive edit. [2] Some may say that disqualifies my first reason for AfD, but then they would be comprised of even more pedantry than Giraffedata, plus they can find the next oldest and AfD that themselves. Mnnlaxer (talk) 04:31, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 14:12, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 14:37, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.