Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelving
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger One ping only 04:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Shelving (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet notability guidelines, is not (at least from this user's experience) accepted or widely-used anatomical terminology LT910001 (talk) 08:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Possibly merge somewhere +/- leave redirect-- the term is occasionally used: [1], [2] ... but this is such a niche article that if it is indeed notable suggest merge to an appropriate anatomic parent article... Lesion (talk) 20:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 09:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Two usages: one obscure jargon, the other unworthy of a redirect to inguinal ligament.Novangelis (talk) 19:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.