Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rijndael encryption alogrithm

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Article Rijndael encryption alogrithm listed on WP:VFD July 4 to July 12 2004, consensus was to delete. Discussion:

Keep. Redirects that you think should be deleted should go on redirects for deletion, misspellings are usually kept in case someone outside of Wikipedia links to them. Dunc_Harris|☺ 13:38, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

This is weird. I don't think Wikipedia should "support" misspellings just because someone out there maybe uses misspelled links... Just my two cents, though. --Alexandre 08:42, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Keep, perfectly reasonable redirect. -- Cyrius|✎ 20:39, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Comment: I'd be inclined to delete this one, if it's needed replace it by one from alogrithm. A redirect from Rijndael encryption algorithm already exists. But as has been said, this isn't the place to raise this anyway. Andrewa 21:40, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
delete, it's just a typo! Erich 06:27, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
delete of course. the idea that random typos should be permanently kept is one of the silliest around. only common mispellings should be kept as redirects. --Zero 09:26, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)