Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lo2a
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lo2a (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable website Asoed (talk) 07:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article does not assert the importance of the subject. Looks like just another search engine. Cloudz679 (talk) 08:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, notability hasn't been established. -Jahnx (talk) 09:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 08:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all of the above. Has been in existence for only around 2 weeks as well, no third party sources whatsoever. Google isn't turning up much in terms of reliable sources, gets a few blog mentions but that's about it I think.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Alexa gives it a traffic rank of 1,771,477. Eklipse (talk) 14:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom and WP:WEB. That's a really low Alex ranking, by the way. Gary King (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.