Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Language of set theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Is unwikified commentary that makes no sense. Has been on cleanup since August 3. Norm 11:50, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Delete - The articles on set theory appears to cover this area quite adequately without this sort of "wow, gosh!" approach --Zaphod Beeblebrox 12:41, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. I agree with Zaphod. --G Rutter 14:51, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: no content. Wile E. Heresiarch 14:56, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: Private beef with math. Geogre 15:20, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is someones comment that might belong on Talk:Set theory, but not in an article. Andris 15:22, Sep 11, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. The original author lost interest in wikipedia, and the article is not salvable. Mikkalai 22:48, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not encyclopedic. Gwalla | Talk 23:42, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Comment: I had started a complete rewrite for here shortly after it appeared on Cleanup, but haven't had the time to get much of anywhere on it. Redirect to Set theory or delete; if I ever manage to finish the piece I was working on offline, it can be added back later if needs be. -FZ 14:11, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)