Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geocivilization

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Geocivilization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially WP:OR based on an obscure research article with lots of WP:COI added in. It is tied to the article Ahmed Sarirete that was created by the same user presumably as WP:PROMO and which is also currently under consideration for deletion. Essentially the concept seems to be introduced in this obscure academic article https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol66/iss66/9/ which has been cited a total of 7 times in the last 13 years and does not have seemed to have gained any traction. While not totally made up, most of it is WP:OR or WP:FRINGE with some references to existing topics but the term does not seem to be widely accepted in academia as a search in JSTOR and Google Scholar shows. --hroest 17:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In marking this article as patrolled, I left a talk page message noting that "geocivilization is frequently used in political science research to discuss how geography shapes politics and vice versa, satisfying WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV for retention." Here are some examples of its use:
  • Sebastian-Gabriel Popescu (2019-04-25). "And Yet the Black Sea Can Be an Essential Geostrategic Pivot in the Solution of Euro-Asiatic Endogenous Conflictuality". Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies Conference Proceedings. doi:10.5281/ZENODO.2651185.
  • Ciderova, Denisa; Repasova, Vladimira (September 2019). "Geo-Heterogeneity in the Context of the EU". European Scientific Journal. 9.
  • Mohanty, Manoranjan (2018). "Sectional President's Address: Alternative Historiography: Tan Chung's Geo-Civilisational Paradigm". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 79: 644–653. ISSN 2249-1937.
  • "Zan Tao: Historical Evolution of Türkiye and Eurasian Geopolitics". Institute of International and Strategic Studies. Peking University. 19 October 2022. Retrieved 23 May 2025.
  • Shih, Chih-yu (2013). "Global Asian: China as Position between Host and Home". Sinicizing International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. pp. 153–173. doi:10.1057/9781137289452_10. ISBN 978-1-349-45016-9.
While the term is definitely niche, I think it is sufficiently notable given its use across this many contexts and regions. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 03:14, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 06:38, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]