Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edge a decade of decadence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Adam Copeland. Skomorokh 16:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Edge a decade of decadence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Reads like a movie review. Fails WP:N. NeutralHomer • Talk • 06:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 06:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Adam Copeland - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 10:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge anything useful into Adam Copeland, failing that, redirect as a plausible search term. youngamerican (wtf?) 13:19, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to grammatically correct title, merge any reasonable content to Adam Copeland, then redirect to Adam Copeland Since I can do the first part of that uncontroversially, I will, I just wanted to !vote with three things :P Nosleep break my slumber 07:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.