Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwarf clans in Inheritance Cycle

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. While the Inheritance series itself is notable, I can't see where this specific part of the series has gained enough coverage to where it'd be notable outside of the series or where it'd merit being a list. As this is already covered in a fan wikia for the series, there's nothing to be lost by deleting this entry. Even if we ran this for the full week, the end result would still be the same, so I'm closing this early. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:22, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarf clans in Inheritance Cycle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolute fancruft. Mr. Guye (talk) 11:55, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- yup, fancruft. Badly sourced, unnecessarily detailed, and written in an in-universe style. Reyk _YO! 12:25, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fancruft is the word, no reason to suppose this is a notable topic.TheLongTone (talk) 16:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - Simply fancruft!, Fails GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom and fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.