Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Shepperd

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles 23:53, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Shepperd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Fails WP:ANYBIO. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep The Order of the Sword is a well-known and significant award and honor. I will add more book references.Geek2003 (talk) 08:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Number 185 on the list of The Order of the Sword recipients (BTW, many other recipient do not have WP articles) and writing some books does not fulfil WP:ANYBIO. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 11:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All of the Order of the Sword Generals should have wiki pages because they have controlled billions of dollars a year from the country affiliated with and affected millions of peoples lives, every year they were in office.Geek2003 (talk) 11:49, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Having a major building named for the General will live in history forever. Geek2003 (talk) 01:59, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additional refs added.Geek2003 (talk) 02:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, subject meets WP:SOLDIER & has sufficient coverage in multiple books in order for the subject to arguably pass WP:GNG. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:19, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Added Major awards and decorations section. Geek2003 (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOLDIER is only a proposed guideline. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:42, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As a general officer, passes WP:SOLDIER and WP:COMMONSENSE. Yes, they're just essays, but they're very sensible essays. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per comments above. --Kumioko (talk) 18:47, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.