Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of network monitoring systems
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 07:16, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comparison of network monitoring systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Tagged since October 2008 for multiple issues, fails WP:OR and WP:SYN. Adamantios (talk) 10:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep as primary sources are still reliable for much of this content, and such documents can be both exceedingly tedious to put together and extremely useful. -- samj inout 12:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep It's disorganized and could really use some help (the revision diffs are basically impossible to read because of the layout of the article), but this is still a very fleshed-out list with a lot of information, and a lot of time has gone into keeping it current. There's no sense in deleting it. Lahnfeear (talk) 18:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and fix per above. There seems to be a precedent for similar "comparison" lists, and it seems well-sourced and current enough. Why the heck was this relisted? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 22:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep nominator does not include any reasons for deletion. AfD is not for cleanup. -Atmoz (talk) 17:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.